Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Standard Fraud Risk Assessment Question: “If someone did want to commit fraud, and not be caught, how would they do it?” One challenge for fraud specialists is getting clients to address the real risk...

1 answer below »
Standard Fraud Risk Assessment Question:
“If someone did want to commit fraud, and not be caught, how would they do it?”
One challenge for fraud specialists is getting clients to address the real risk of fraud faced by their organizations (internal or external). For this assignment, you are to set aside your otherwise ethical nature and plan, speculate, or otherwise describe, in reasonable detail, how you, or someone else you know, would go about successfully committing a fraud. This fraud is of your choice, but should fall into one of the categories we are discussing (e.g. asset misappropriation, financial reporting, corruption, cybercrime, etc.) This may be a first person account (i.e. a fraud I could commit) or a fraud you believe someone else could commit. However, it must be based on facts and factors that you are aware of personally. The act may be intended to benefit the fraudster individually, or their organization.
You will discuss how the fraud would occur, what the target of the fraud is (i.e., what would be taken or manipulated), how it would benefit the fraudster(s) (e.g. how converted to cash, etc.) and how it would be disguised or concealed. You should also include discussions of any relevant controls, including any that may need to be bypassed or are not operating effectively. In preparing this assignment, I want to you draw on some of the lessons you have learned in this class or other classes related to issues of fraud. For example, you should describe any relevant fraud risk factors. Note: if you are doing a first person account, you are not required to disclose any highly personal pressures or rationalizations (other than – “it’s required for my grade” or “my professor made me do it”).
In the interests of catharsis and a civil society – I want you to conclude by discussing (briefly) any preventive or detective controls could be put into place to address your scheme.
The format of the paper should be between 5 – 10 pages (double spaced) of narrative. If needed, you may include (but are not required to) additional references such as diagrams, tables, data, maps, locations, and organization charts as an appendix. Avoid putting any substantive content in the appendixes.
Some comments/considerations on this assignment:
  • In my experience, people are hesitant to consider fraud from their own perspective or that of colleagues. However, a robust consideration of fraud requires a critical look at where real frauds might occur. People on the “inside” or with particular experience are in the best position to surface these issues and vulnerabilities.
  • This is not a case study of a past fraud. I don’t want you to describe a fraud that has occurred. I want you to look at the facts known to you and think up a future fraud.
  • No citations or references are required.
  • You may base this on your experience at a current or former employer, but please change the names of ?entities or persons involved.
  • Do not resort to “capers” or outright criminal enterprises – i.e. armed robberies, bank heists, hostage taking, James Bond or Mission Impossible type plots, etc. I’m looking at more subtle frauds – ones that could really occur and be concealed. That said, misappropriation of assets (e.g. cash, inventory, etc.) is fair game.
Answered Same Day Dec 21, 2021

Solution

Robert answered on Dec 21 2021
129 Votes
Fraud 1

“If someone did want to commit fraud, and not be caught, how they would do it?”
Fraud 2
Fraud
Introduction
Accounting and financials frauds are the headlines now days. From Enron and WorldCom to
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, every week a new high profile scandal comes in news. Accounting
fraud is a white-collar crime. Its frequency and harmfulness to society are debatable, though its
eturn on investment to the fraudster is extraordinarily high, assuming the fraudster is not
detected and imprisoned within the near term. Many academic investigators have researched
accounting fraud, using case studies, surveys, financial news media reports, analyses of US
Securities and Exchange Commission Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases (SEC
AAERs) data. My objective in this article is to explain the general methodologies and theories
used by these investigators to understand accounting fraud and to provide advice on how to
approach the risk of accounting fraud at a practical level and also to explain financial statement
frauds, targets why people commit it,
iefing about window dressing and money laundering.
(Fogarty, T. J., & Jonas, 2010)
What is Fraud
Fraud is a deliberate act in the form of misrepresentation that may cause monetary or
non-monetary losses to second person. There are different types of frauds from identity theft to
insurance fraud, to falsifying tax information and making false statements. Prosecution of fraud
can be done in both civil and criminal court.
Elements of fraud
The elements of fraud are “representation or statement of fact” , “ Representation or
statement must be untrue” , “The statement must be material i.e. it should be meaningful and
Fraud 3
elevant” , “The speaker must know the statement is false” , “The speaker intends the statement
to be relied on” , “The hearer does not know the statement in not true” , “The hearer relies on
the statement”, “The hearer must suffer damages may it be monetary or non-monetary”.
Who commits fraud?
The people who commit frauds are termed as Fraud Perpetrators. Usually there is no
difference between fraud perpetrators from other people, because they have same profile like
other honest people in both demographic and psychological characteristics. Fraud perpetrators
are very less likely to be caught, a
ested, and convicted when compared to the criminals.
Generally 2 % of the fraud perpetrators are females and 30% are women and the rest belongs to
male category. They are better educated, more religious. They have less criminal records, less
usage of alcohol and drugs. They are also in better psychological health. Most employees,
customers, vendors, business associates and partners fits the profile of fraud perpetrators and
probably capable of committing frauds
Why people commit fraud / Fraud Triangle
Fraud triangle
ings into picture different reasons why fraud perpetrators engage into
fraudulent activities. The three major reasons of fraud are: (1) Perceived pressure (2)
ationalization (3) Perceived knowledge and opportunity to commit the crime.
Fraud 4
Pressure: Pressure refers to something that has happened in the fraudster’s personal life
that creates a stressful need that motivates him to steal. The different types of pressure that
creates stressful need are financial pressure, work related pressure and other societal pressure
Rationalizing: Every fraud involves rationalization. Most perpetrators are first time
offenders who would not commit other crimes. Rationalizing help them to hide from the
dishonesty of their acts. Some common rationalizations used by fraudsters are “The organization...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here