Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Read the opinion in the case of Norino Properties v. Balsamo, an uploaded document in Assignments in Blackboard, and write five hundred (500) words on this case including the following: A. Take a...

1 answer below »
Read the opinion in the case of Norino Properties v. Balsamo, an uploaded document in Assignments in Blackboard, and write five hundred (500) words on this case including the following: A. Take a position pro (agree)or con (disagree) on this decision and explain why and upon what legal principles you rely (look in your text book if you want help); B. What did the court hold and why; C. What did the court do with the case procedurally and what do you think that means for the case after this opinion, e.g. where do the parties go from here; D. What judge wrote the majority opinion; E. Were there minority, concurring or dissenting opinions and which judges wrote those opinions; F. What was the difference between the majority opinion and any minority, concurring or dissenting opinions; G. What court issued this opinion; H. How did the case get to that court; I. What does this case mean in terms of a change in the law.
Answered 1 days After Mar 26, 2022

Solution

Ananya answered on Mar 27 2022
118 Votes
Running Head: NORINO PROPERTIES VS BALSAMO                    1
NORINO PROPERTIES VS BALSAMO                            3
NORINO PROPERTIES VS BALSAMO
Table of Contents
Article Review    3
Article Review
    I agree with the decision made by the court. The case has no proof and is based on only claims. Mr. Balsamo agreed to the agreement in the first place but wanted to back out from the deal due to personal interest of not expending the compensation from the BNP company as he was the partner in the group. Due to this he
ought several claims against Mr. Zorzit of being guilty and he is being the victim in the situation. The legal principles maintained for the decision according to me are extensive delay in the case which occu
ed due to producing new claims by Mr. Balsamo’s counsellor each time of trial. Lack of solid proofs in written or documentation were missing from Mr. Balsamo’s side. The nature of the complaint changed each time of trial as new claims were raised. Hence the dismissal of amendment made by the court is a...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here