Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Question 3: Product Liability & Other Legal/Ethical Issues (25 points) [ XXXXXXXXXXwords] According to Business Insider (Bastone, 2019), Google announced in February 2019 that Google’s Nest home...

1 answer below »
Question 3: Product Liability & Other Legal/Ethical Issues (25 points) [ XXXXXXXXXXwords]
According to Business Insider (Bastone, 2019), Google announced in Fe
uary 2019 that Google’s Nest home security alarm system would be receiving an update to enable its virtual assistant technology, Google Assistant, which was something of a surprise to Nest product owners (customers) who were not aware the product contained a microphone on the security device. A Google representative described this omission from the technical specs for the product to Business Insider as an “e
or” (Bastone, XXXXXXXXXXRead the Bastone XXXXXXXXXXarticle cited below and respond to the questions that follow.
· Bastone, N. (2019, Feb. 19). Google says the built-in microphone it never told Nest users about was ‘never supposed to be a secret.’ Retrieved from https:
www.businessinsider.com/nest-microphone-was-never-supposed-to-be-a-secret-2019-2
1) Briefly, is this “e
or” a potential area of product liability for Google? Why or why not?
2) In light of this e
or, does Google have any “ethical duty” to do anything for Nest customers?
3) What options exist for Google to address the e
or with Nest customers now?
Discuss your responses to both customer problems in paragraph format. Support your views with specific references to course materials such as modules and required readings or recommended readings.
Question
3
:

Product

Liability & Other Legal
Ethical

Issues

(25 points) [500
-

750 words]
According to
Business Inside

(Bastone, 2019), Google announced in Fe
uary
2019 that Google’s Nest home security alarm system would be receiving an
update to enable its virtual assistant technology, Google Assistant
,

which
was
something of a surprise to N
est product owners
(customers)
who were not
aware the product contained a microphone on the security device.
A Google
epresentative described this
omission from the technical specs for the product
to
Business Inside

as an “e
or” (Bastone, 2019).
Read

the
Bastone (2019)
article cited below
and respond to the questions
that follow
.
·

Bastone, N. (2019, Feb. 19). Google says the built
-
in microphone it never told
Nest users about was ‘never supposed to be a secret.’ Retrieved from
https:
www.businessinsider.com/nest
-
microphone
-
was
-
neve
-
supposed
-
to
-
e
-
a
-
secret
-
2019
-
2
1)
Briefly, i
s this “e
or” a

potential area of

product liability

for
Google
? Why
or why not?
2)
In light of this e
or, does Google have any “ethical duty” to do
anything for
Nest customers
?

3)
What options exist for Google to address the e
or with Nest
customers
now?
Discuss your responses

to both customer problems

in paragraph format.
Support your views
with
specific references to course materials such as modules and required readings

or
ecommended readings
.
Question 3: Product Liability & Other Legal/Ethical Issues (25 points) [ XXXXXXXXXXwords]


According to Business Insider (Bastone, 2019), Google announced in Fe
uary
2019 that Google’s Nest home security alarm system would be receiving an
update to enable its virtual assistant technology, Google Assistant, which was
something of a surprise to Nest product owners (customers) who were not
aware the product contained a microphone on the security device. A Google
epresentative described this omission from the technical specs for the product
to Business Insider as an “e
or” (Bastone, XXXXXXXXXXRead the Bastone (2019)
article cited below and respond to the questions that follow.

 Bastone, N. (2019, Feb. 19). Google says the built-in microphone it never told
Nest users about was ‘never supposed to be a secret.’ Retrieved from
https:
www.businessinsider.com/nest-microphone-was-never-supposed-to-be-
a-secret-2019-2



1) Briefly, is this “e
or” a potential area of product liability for
Google? Why or why not?
2) In light of this e
or, does Google have any “ethical duty” to do
anything for Nest customers?
3) What options exist for Google to address the e
or with Nest
customers now?

Discuss your responses to both customer problems in paragraph format. Support your views
with specific references to course materials such as modules and required readings or
ecommended readings.
Answered Same Day Mar 09, 2021

Solution

Soumi answered on Mar 10 2021
141 Votes
Running Head: PRODUCT LIABILITY AND ETHICAL ISSUES    1
PRODUCT LIABILITY AND ETHICAL ISSUES     7
PRODUCT LIABILITY AND ETHICAL ISSUES: ON GOOGLE’S NEST HOME SECURITY ALARM SYSTEM
QUESTION 3: PRODUCT LIABILITY & OTHER LEGAL/ETHICAL ISSUES
Table of Contents
1) Justifying if the Mentioned E
or poses as a Product Liability for Google    3
2) Probable Ethical Duty of Google in this Context    4
3) Options to Address the E
or    5
References    7
1) Justifying if the Mentioned E
or poses as a Product Liability for Google
It is found that Google’s Nest Security Alarms have been a very successful product from since the beginning and have been manufactured in millions of units, to be sold worldwide. It is expected that the products will be sold in even higher numbers in the future, as the price of the product has been dropped in recently. Although the price is yet high for a large number of customers; however, it is a premium pricing strategy for niche customers, it is expected that the product would be of higher quality (The Verge, 2018). In the given case study, it is found that Google has claimed that the availability of a microphone in the device, which was not known to the customers, had been an e
or on Google’s side.
Considering the circumstantial evidence, it is evident that the said e
or mentioned by Google is a potential area of Google’s product liability. In the views of Kubasek, Brennan and Browne (1996, chapter 20), product liability is defined as the claim that can be made by a consumer when they have suffered a loss or an injury due to a product that was defective. In the given case study, since the availability of the microphone was not informed by Google to their customers; therefore, the customers suffered from a loss that would emerge due to the lack or presence of a recording device in their home security system. As mentioned by Foucart, Wan and Wang (2018), in the modern technology market, companies always mention about the specification of their products as a means of product promotion. Google, being a leader in modern information technology industry, has very little legitimacy of their claim that they have forgotten about mentioning the existence of a microphone in the Nest Security Alarm System they sold.
The existence of a microphone, in an internet-connected device, is always risky as it held the potential chances of privacy
each, unethical data collection and compromise of confidential information. It is clear that the awareness of the Nest product having a microphone would have not made many...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here