Assessment item 2 – Findings and Discussion
Due: XXXXXXXXXXMonday of Week 5, 9 am AEST
Length: XXXXXXXXXX words
Conditions: XXXXXXXXXXIndividual
Weighting: XXXXXXXXXX%
Requirements
Based on the foundational work of all prior assessments conducted in MNG93217 Industry Research Part A and Assessment 1 of MNG93218 Part B, you are required to
· provide a summary of research findings (including relevant charts, graphs and/or figures to highlight the most relevant findings)
· provide a written discussion, comparing qualitative and quantitative findings (when mixed method is adopted), linking the findings to the problem space and the research question(s)
Please note that graphs, charts, tables, figures, problem statement, research aim and research questions do not count towards the word limit.
The sections you write for this assessment can be copied into your final report (assessment 3).
This assignment must be structured as follows and submited through Turnitin.
Prescribed Assessment Structure
1. Brief statement of the problem space (1 – 2 sentences)
2. Research aim and research questions(s)
3. Findings (500 – 800 words)
· Present your findings (no need to compare findings with the literature in this section)
· Support your findings by including evidence from your data in the form of tables, graphs, charts, and/or figures (which are not included in the word count)
4. Discussion (1,200 – 1,500 words)
· Compare your (qualitative and quantitative if mixed methods is adopted) findings with the academic literature you used as the foundation for this project
· Discuss how your findings relate back to the research question(s)
Marking criteria:
Sections
Assessing criteria
Weightage
Findings
· Informs sample characteristics
· Evidence of appropriate analysis
· Expertly presented findings supported by evidences and visuals (where appropriate)
12 marks
Discussion
· Includes evidence of triangulation i.e. comparison of quantitative and qualitative findings (if mixed method was used)
· Findings were compared with the literature reviewed
· Answer(s) to research question(s) were clearly stated
18 marks
Total:
30 marks
Assignment 1
y Joe Min
Submission date: 11-Mar XXXXXXXXXX:27PM (UTC+1100)
Submission ID: XXXXXXXXXX
File name: IRP_B__JoeMIN.docx (18.44K)
Word count: 1017
Character count: 6137
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
57%
SIMILARITY INDEX
7%
INTERNET SOURCES
4%
PUBLICATIONS
57%
STUDENT PAPERS
1 54%
2 3%
Exclude quotes Of f
Exclude bibliography Of f
Exclude matches Of f
Assignment 1
ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
Submitted to Southern Cross University
Student Pape
Submitted to Napier University
Student Pape
FINAL GRADE
20
Assignment 1
GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructo
PAGE 1
Comment 1
Should include the partner's name.
Comment 2
Is that a management problem?
Comment 3
Does not co
elate with the problem.
Comment 4
That sentence is enough. But how do you wnat to reduce it - these are external inlf luences.
PAGE 2
Comment 5
These are two dif f ernet research areas and the questions are poorly f ormulated.
PAGE 3
PAGE 4
Comment 6
A more detailed explanantion would be helpf ul.
Comment 7
How do you get access to these persons?
PAGE 5
Comment 8
Where are these questions are coming f rom? It seems they are not based on the literature and
f or surveys, you should use only pre-validated surveys, so please provide the
source
ef erence.
Comment 9
I don't understand.
PAGE 6
PAGE 7
Assignment 1
by Joe Min
Assignment 1
ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
Assignment 1
GRADEMARK REPORT
FINAL GRADE
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor