Topic 1: Response to Huicane KatrinaThe response to Huicane Katrina, by all standards, was a major...

Question

Topic 1: Response to Huicane KatrinaThe response to Huicane Katrina, by all standards, was a major failure of the federal, state, and local government’s emergency management systems. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) proved ineffective. Why do you believe that DHS and FEMA proved to be so ineffective in this disaster? Discuss the changes that have occued since then to improve the emergency response to such disasters, and state whether or not you believe these changes will be effective in similar disasters.NB: You can read my classmate assignment below to give you an understanding:    Huicane Katrina was a hoible natural disaster that took place in 2005. The Huicane was considered to be a category 5 tropical storm, that destroyed roughly $120 billion dollars’ worth of damage and tragically killing close to 1,200 people. The state of Louisiana suffered roughly 57% of the damage done by Huicane Katrina. A large portion of New Orleans was underwater for nearly two and a half weeks after the events from the Huicane. Still to this day huicane Katrina is considered to be one of the worst natural disasters that have occued on American soil.                    Government Organizations such as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) had a rather troublesome time trying to deal with the disasters. I believe that both DHS and FEMA struggled to deal with the events due to a lack of communication. According to Whitley et al. (2006).During the first few hours and days after landfall, we saw eakdowns in communication within and among every level of government: between federal, state, and local officials; and, perhaps most critically, between government and the citizens of the affected areas. We saw an inability to establish with any certainty what was actually happening and to deploy the appropriate resources to deal with each situation. Many citizens in the Gulf Coast region and elsewhere in the United States may have lost confidence in the government's ability to respond to a catastrophic event (p. 3).There are a lot of factors as to why there may have been a severe level of miscommunication. DHS was still relatively new at the time. I feel that with DHS being founded in 2002 and Huicane Katrina happening just a few years later, DHS may have been a little inexperienced. FEMA was underfunded at the time and couldn’t adequately respond as they should.                 After Huicane Katrina took place, FEMA was issued power to help plan and utilize resources before a storm or natural disaster takes place. Which could hopefully prevent anything like Huicane Katrina from happening again. I believe that this will be beneficial to all states and their people because, it took the government days to respond to the people in New Orleans, being prepared by moving in supplies could help prevent infrastructure damage as well as cut down on casualties sustained from further natural disasters.   REFERENCE:Whitley, J., Coddington, K., & Koenig, G XXXXXXXXXXHomeland security after huicane katrina: Where do we go from here. Natural Resources & Environment, 20(4), 3-9.Topic 2: Assessing RisksYou are the director of emergency services for your community and you are responsible for developing an emergency response plan. First, you must identify areas of risk by identifying those natural and technological hazards within your community. Describe how you would go about identifying these natural and technological hazards. How would you assess the potential risk to the community that these hazards present? Discuss ways that you would use to ensure these hazards are updated regularly or whenever they change.NB:I do not think you need reference for Topic 2 because it your own idea.

Parul · Accepted Answer

Topic 1: Reply to Hurricane Katrina
Even though a decade has passed by scar from disaster of Hurricane Katrina are still deep. Taking reference from (Knabb, R. D., Rhome, J. R., & Brown, D. P., 2005) the city New Orleans, is still recovering from the havoc that was leashed on them. In retrospect, if we can say that disaster of Katrina was much more man-made than it was natural. With a massive death toll of more than 1900 people, Katrina is considered as the third most lethal hurricane in the history of US. This storm was known to the government and federal agencies however, they proved to be a monumental disappointment. Indeed, the response of government was so evidently incompetent that it allowed serious catastrophic problems to prevail. I want to draw your attention to the key federal failures that worsen this disaster. Primary federal authorities were not proactive in communicating the necessary details to the people along with inadequate training. With reference to (Apaza, C. R., 2009) government employees where confused in themselves and had varying degree of unfamiliarity with their roles. It is a known fact that there was tremendous confusions over the mission assignments, delegation, deployment, implementation of the plan as well as the command structure. Another reason why government agencies proved to be a major failure was because officials had no prior experience of managing disaster and underlying coping mechanisms
Four overall components added to the disappointments of Katrina: 
1) Long haul admonitions went unnoticed and government authorities dismissed their obligations to get ready for an admonished fiasco; 
2) Government authorities took inadequate activities or settled on helpless choices in the days preceding and after landfall;

Topic 1: Response to Hurricane Katrina The response to Hurricane Katrina, by all standards, was a major failure of the federal, state, and local government’s emergency management systems. The...

Solution

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

Submit New Assignment