Overview The research assignment consists of three (3) questions. All three questions must be...

Question

Overview The research assignment consists of three (3) questions. All three questions must be attempted. You are expected to use a range of primary (legislation; case law) and secondary materials (textbooks; journals) to answer each question. Word limit Each question has a recommended word limit of 1,000 words. The total word count for the assignment is 3, XXXXXXXXXX%). Bibliography and footnotes are not included in the word count. However, substantial comment in footnotes will be included. Written assignments that are more than 10% in excess of the word limit will incur a marking penalty of up to 10% of the maximum possible marks per hundred words. General presentation and formatting requirements: • Please use headings/subheadings, 1.5 spacing, 12-point Arial font, margins of at least 2.5cm, and number each page. • All sources must be appropriately referenced. Any referencing style may be used, so long as the source of information is readily identifiable; please include a bibliography at the end of your paper. Please cite cases according to the legal style used in the textbook. • Pay attention to language, style, and presentation. The ability to write clearly and succinctly is an important professional skill. • Please make appropriate use of headings. • Correct grammar, punctuation and spelling are essential. • You must include a cover page with your name, student number, and the total word count for your assignment. Penalties for late submission For assignments 1 to 10 days late, a penalty of 10% (of total available marks) per day will apply. For assignments more than 10 days late, a penalty of 100% will apply. Weekend days (Saturday and Sunday) are considered when counting total late days for electronic submissions. 3 If you feel you
	
Document Preview: Overview The research assignment consists of three (3) questions. All three questions must be attempted. You are expected to use a range of primary (legislation; case law) and secondary materials (textbooks; journals) to answer each question. Word limit Each question has a recommended word limit of 1,000 words. The total word count for the assignment is 3, XXXXXXXXXX%). Bibliography and footnotes are not included in the word count. However, substantial comment in footnotes will be included. Written assignments that are more than 10% in excess of the word limit will incur a marking penalty of up to 10% of the maximum possible marks per hundred words. General presentation and formatting requirements: • Please use headings/subheadings, 1.5 spacing, 12-point Arial font, margins of at least 2.5cm, and number each page. • All sources must be appropriately referenced. Any referencing style may be used, so long as the source of information is readily identifiable; please include a bibliography at the end of your paper. Please cite cases according to the legal style used in the textbook. • Pay attention to language, style, and presentation. The ability to write clearly and succinctly is an important professional skill. • Please make appropriate use of headings. • Correct grammar, punctuation and spelling are essential. • You must include a cover page with your name, student number, and the total word count for your assignment. Penalties for late submission For assignments 1 to 10 days late, a penalty of 10% (of total available marks) per day will apply. For assignments more than 10 days late, a penalty of 100% will apply. Weekend days (Saturday and Sunday) are considered when counting total late days for electronic submissions. 3 If you feel you are unable to submit the assignment on time, you must apply to the lecturer BEFORE the due date explaining why and with supporting evidence if applicable. This does not displace the normal RMIT rules of Special Consideration....

Robert · Accepted Answer

GM586 Case Analysis Template
Running Head: LAW                                                                                                       1 

Law 
Student Name: 
Date 
Professor 
Name of Professor
Law                                                                                                                       2
Answer. 1  
Fact: In this case, Elena was the owner of a beauty salon that quite successful 
and popular hot spot for fashion icons in North Melbourne due to it had won a number of 
creative styling awards and featured by InStyle magazine in 2014. Elena‟s brother 
Ringo impressed by his sister salon success and popularity, so he was to launch a 
fashion hub for elite brands. Ringo was formulated a new shopping centre on the 
outskirts of Williamstown in early 2015. Ringo decided to approach Elena for new 
shopping centre through offer lease her one of his „prime location‟ stores. He tells his 
sister that many big brands had already signed leases for long-term to establish high-
end fashion shops and a cinema in new shopping centre. Elena was excited by the new 
shopping centre development and agrees to five year-lease at $3000 per week. Elena‟s 
new beauty salon opened in 15 January 2016 until the development of new shopping 
centre was partially finished. Ringo had not actually signed leases of big brands on 1 
January 2016 and the cinema construction was taken another 12 months in completed. 
In that time, a number of shopkeepers begin to leave due to without big brand they 
faced struggles to attract customers in this new shopping centre.  
The main issue is generated after 10 months of established salon due to Ringo 
publishes advertisement in the Herald Sun on 23 November 2016 as “Short time offer! 
Special rate of $1,500 per week for all businesses that sign a new 2-year lease at our 
Williamstown Shopping Centre”. Elena reads the advertisement on 24 November 2016 
that makes angry her that she is paying double amount for her salon lease than amount 
offered in the newspaper. She writes to Ringo demanding that decrease her rent to 
$1,500 per week on the same day. After three days, Ringo writes back to Elena saying 
that he would cut down the rent to $2,000 per week. For the next 6 months, Elena pays 
the reduced rent, but Ringo sues Elena to recover $6,000 that he claims is „rent in 
arrears‟.  
Rule: The Australian Contract Law regulation explained that a contract is valid if 
written or oral agreement happens between the two parties their they agreed for 
consideration, payment, terms & conditions in order to perform some legal act now 
otherwise to refrain from performing in the future (Australian Government, 2017). 
Therefore, a valid lease contract and valid lease decline contract has created between 
Law                                                                                                                       3
Ringo and Elena under the Australian Contract Law, due to written form of agreement 
happened among them. Ringo write to Elena for demanding the reduce lease rent and 
after three days Ringo writes back to Elena to reduce the rent to $2,000 per week. 
Therefore it is valid agreement and according to Contract Law, so Ringo could not legal 
right to recover $6,000 from Elena due to he has given permission to Elena to reduce 
the lease rent. Elena has the right to terminate the lease in behalf of wrong facts, laying 
statement, and high rent changed by Ringo (Julie Clarke, 2010).  
Application: In this case, main issues generated due to Ringo telling laying with 
Elena that number of high-end fashion shops and a cinema already had already signed 
long-term leases, so that she also signed a 5 year-lease at $3000 per week. 
Misstatement or misguidance or wrong facts present by one party (Ringo) is 
represented invalid contract under the Australian Contract Law (Poole, 2012). Elena 
store at a prime location in new shopping centre, but unable to attract the customers 
due to lack of big brands and many shopkeepers begin to leave. Elena disappointed to 
the wrong facts presented and false promised by Ringo that a number of the big brands 
signed long-term leases in new shopping centre and cinema construction also required 
12 months more time period. Elena has believed that numbers of big brand and cinema 
establish a fashion hub in new shopping centre that would be helped it to successfully 
run beauty salon, but false promised and wrong facts affected her salon performance 
(McKendrick & Liu, 2015).  
Moreover, other fact that after 10 months of Elena established salon (1 January 
2016) in Williamstown Shopping Centre, then Ringo publishes advertisement in the 
Herald Sun on 23 November 2016 that special rate offer of 1,500 per week for all 
business that sign 2-year lease. It indicates Elena paid double amount of lease at $3000 
per week then offer in newspaper advertise that frustrated her, so she writes to Ringo to 
putdown the lease rent of her premier store to $1,500. Ringo writes back to Elena and 
reply that he would diminish the rent to $2,000 per week rather cut down the rent to 
$1,500 of her premier store. Williamstown shopping centre continues to struggle that 
affected the business of Elena‟s salon that she is looking upon firing the lease. Elena 
has the right to terminate the lease and justified it legally due to Ringo misguided her 
and his false statement that many big brands signed leases and a cinema that affected 
Law                                                                                                                       4
or financial losses of salon business (Radan, Gooley & Vickovich, 2010). It recommends 
that Ringo‟s should complete cinema construction and spend on marketing of 
Williamstown shopping centre to attract big brands for lease and achieve success.  
Conclusion: According to Australian Contract Law, a valid contract has not 
created between Ringo and Elena, due to Ringo presented wrong facts of long-term 
leases signed by big brands and a cinema to encourage for Elena to beauty salon 
lease. Ringo has already changed high rent from Elena, so according to contract law 
Ringo sues Elena to recover $6,000 would neglect by the court due to his false 
statement and wrong promise associated with big brands long-term leases and cinema 
(Davison, Monotti & Wiseman, 2012). On the basis of case information, it stated that 
Elena advice Ringo‟s to finish cinema construction as soon as possible and should use 
marketing and promotional strategies to attract big brands for leases shops in 
Williamstown Shopping Centre.  
Answer. 2  
Fact: In this case, Albert is looking for build a small unit; therefore looking for a 
builder straightaway. Albert neighbour Steven was advice that his bother George owned 
a construction company.

Overview The research assignment consists of three (3) questions. All three questions must be attempted. You are expected to use a range of primary (legislation; case law) and secondary materials...

Solution

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

Submit New Assignment