Index.
ECC
Numbe
Title of Engineering Competency Claim
Page
EA3
Responsibility for engineering activities
2
EA5
Engage with the relevant community and stakeholders
3
EA6
Identify, assess, and manage risks
4
EA7
Meet Legal and Regulatory Requirements
5
EA9
Performance Success is benchmarked
6
EA10
Taking action is demonstrated
7
EA11
Judgement is demonstrated
8
EA13
Local engineering knowledge is demonstrated
9
2
ENGINEERING COMPETENCY CLAIMS
EA6 – Identify, assess, and manage risks
Engineering Competency Claim: EA6 – Identify, assess and manage risks
Competency Element Claimed
Title (if applicable): Systems Manager, Murlo Rest Area (as Project Engineer)
(6.1) I prepared the PMP which included WHS, Quality, Environmental and Risk management. The risk assessment was done by consulting relevant employees, sub-contractors and stakeholders. The assessment in the register as Hazard Identification Risk Assessment and Control (HIRAC) contained the engineering activity, potential hazard, risk type, untreated risk level, controls & mitigation, residual risk rating and responsibility. The risk register was reviewed on a monthly basis to see if any update was required. The risk was considered in but not limited in managing Safety In Design, Plant & Machine, installation, hazardous substance assessment, site conditions etc.
(6.2) In the capacity of organisation systems manager, I established the audit program to ensure the systems and sub systems are routinely audited to verify that but not limited to systems and activities being ca
ied out to comply with planned a
angements, implemented and maintained as per requirements, are effectively contributing to the effectiveness of the system etc. The audit program was based on the business and project level risks and the results were documented in the audit schedule ensuring at least scope, frequency, method, training requirements, responsibilities etc. I conducted the planned audit with frequency including system elements, procedure, processes, expected date with nominated auditor including site checks.
(6.3) Murlo Rest Area project was very challenging as this project was chosen by Office of Federal Government Commission (OFSC) for safety as part of their issuance of Federal Safety Certificate which was ultimately won under my systems management. My systems to the project specific requirements were written by me based on my experience with previous auditors also to comply to the OFSC requirements. In accordance to New South Wales (NSW) state Government, this project also required a routing report on quality, safety, cost claim and environmental management. I effectively managed to claim the targeted monthly cost and reported the project future monthly claim which was essential client requirement. I did this using a spreadsheet with info graphics, previous claim cu
ent claim, remaining claim as part of contract management. I reported to client with monthly construction program of targeted activities under each categorical element and as required with constraints of change, weather impact etc. All work activities were delivered in accordance to NSW Roads and Maritime standards for product & design standards other than the project designs. The engineering specification was already set in the tender process prior to winning the project. The compliance to specification and materials conformance were maintained after seeking approval from client as part of the PMP and all the documents as mentioned in EA3.
Remaining 50% of this ECC to be continued….
EA 6.1, 6.2, 6.4 & 6.5 requires an additional practical demonstration - See APPNEDIX 1
Signature of Candidate:
Candidate’s Verifie
s Name: __________________________________
Engineering Qualifications: (or Engineers Australia Membership Number): ____________
I verify that the above na
ative is a true account of the candidates own work
Signature:
EA13 – Local engineering knowledge is demonstrated
Engineering Competency Claim: EA13 – Local engineering knowledge is demonstrated
Competency Element Claimed
Title (if applicable): Project Engineer, Moncrieff East Estate Stage 2
(13.1) I did apply the local engineering knowledge both with in ACT and outside the te
itory. In this project, I applied the contract technical exceptional clause specification in conjunction with SSUIW specification of ACT. The technical exceptional clause was additional and some replacement to SSUIW for activities as shown as example in EA 7.2. (a) To elaborate more, the field tests that were ca
ied on base compaction was safely tested in a laboratory through a laboratory. The laboratory conducted the tests safely through their automated compactors in accordance to ISO/IEC 17025 as per National Association of testing Authorities (NATA), Australia and ensured the key results Maximum Modified Dry Density confirms the minimum percentage of set result which is 98% is achieved including other data such as moisture, wet/dry etc. Similarly, California Bearing Ration (CBR) of soil and compressive test of concrete were conducted. (b) For the most precise level achievement, we used SITECH GPS in the excavators and graders. These GPS were periodically cali
ated with certification. Similarly, the construction plant & machinery were periodically maintained. (c) As explained in EA 3.1, quality management systems were in place in accordance of ISO 9001. The associated records were maintained and for continuous improvement, a non-conformance report was maintained to record the non-compliance and co
ective action.
(13.2) Environmental management as planned in CEMP, the ACT Government’s approval was required on proposed plan if the area of project is more than 2.5 hectares. The plan I showed not limited to erosion controls, stockpile, tree protection, sediment pond management etc in accordance to authority which was managed under ISO 14001
(13.3) I prepared the CEMP outlining the environmental management systems that will be used in the project with the aim to provide effective management with responsible persons by providing a set of procedure to minimise potential impact. The existing CEMP system was updated based on the project specific, nature of project, results of the environmental risk and based on the changes as required by authority. The organisation was required to hold a valid Environmental Protection Agreement. Where required, water way licence was required to obtain if the works were ca
ied adjacent to water way and design professional design submission was applicable
Remaining 50% of this ECC to be continued….
Signature of Candidate:
Candidate’s Verifie
s Name: __________________________________
Engineering Qualifications: (or Engineers Australia Membership Number): ____________
I verify that the above na
ative is a true account of the candidates own work
Signature:
Future Project thesis & research: RECYCLED CONCRETE IN REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURE (RCRCS)
APPENDIX 1 – EA6.1, 6.2, 6.4 & 6.5
Appendix 1 is written as part of literature review for the project topic which was developed in ENG8300
RECYCLED CONCRETE IN REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURE (RCRCS)
To source the recycled products, it is important to find the selective demolition. As the industries of construction and demolition still see as a debatable due to economic benefits and customers may have concern about the quality. There is uncertainty to its environmental benefits. There is a lack of standards due non testing on products used in Recycled Concrete (RC). There is a concern of supply due to lack of required quantity. It is unclear whether the authorities may have environmental concerns. Recycled Aggregate (RA) sourced from Construction & Demolition Waste (CDW) will have high potential value as recycling industries are aware and they are imposing a very strict control procedures to remove the amount of contaminations. There are several studies on RA usage in concrete and mortar which needs to be industrial practice through the local authorities’ regulation. RA are sourced from the sites of demolition which is crushed where recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) can be produced. Similarly, Recycled Masonry Aggregate (RMA) can be produced from building waste such as ceramic
icks, blocks. However, there is a risk of contaminants from demolition sites which can contain asphalt, plastic, metals, wood, soil, glass etc. The presence of theses contaminants is due to lack of segregation during the waste disposal. The chemical contents such as chloride, alkali may also be present in the waste concrete. Above, the selection of demolition is important for identification of material. The Project Management Plan (PMP) with associated Quality Assurance (QA) templates is to be implemented. The PMP must contain the QA policy, roles & responsibilities of persons, production control systems, Non-Conformance Report (NCR), Inspection Test Plan (ITP), checklists, testing requirements and audit schedule. The QA templates are to be controlled with document numbers. Example of QA templates are register of source of demolition waste, quantity received, contaminants & percentage in demolition waste, quantity of residual waste that is ready for crushing, other waste management records etc. The Work Health & Safety (WHS) plan must be in place as safety of all is main priority. The WHS plan must demonstrate safe operations of recycling facility and a daily control. The risk must be identified in the Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Control register of possible hazard, likelihood, consequence, control. The possible hazard are non-conforming properties, chemical, density, environmental etc. The Recycling must have procedure to be in place to sort out the contaminants. Depending on the crushing procedure, the contents of materials such as concrete,
ick, etc may change which varies the physical properties. Silva’s literature review only shows the contents and procedure but not how to treat the deficiencies. Hence the sieve analysis test to be done. For a water cement ration, increasing the cement in concrete mix will lead to constant compressive strength. A random statistical analysis must be done on various dried density such as water absorption, oven dried density etc. Water absorption of RA found higher than natural aggregates due to existing mortar content which needs to effectively be treated in the mix design. The report of Ajdukiewicz & Kliszczewicz XXXXXXXXXXthat properties of the natural concrete will impact the mechanical properties of RA concrete where it is potential to obtain recycled concrete with greater compressive strength than the original. The density of recycled concrete was different to natural concrete to RA as per Topcu & Gunan XXXXXXXXXXwhen conducted the experiment. Rakshvir M and Barai SV 2006 concludes RA water absorption and decreased density resulted in the decreased compressive strength than natural concrete strength although the grading of aggregate was maintained constant. This is not important when used for walls or suspended slab. The RA concrete can also be used in the place where no fine concrete is required to be poured over underground subsoil drainage. The effect of RA can be reduced by 30% replacement with fresh coarse aggregate and by increasing the cement. If the pre-soaking the RA is done, the feasibility of recycled concrete will be more for structural purposes. Using the plasticizer will also reduce the volume of voids which will provide improved mechanical properties. The use of RA concrete showed the suitability when behaviour of beam-column joints made of RA under cyclic loading as per Valeria Corinaldesi. The control measures of treating the RA with secondary