Meenakshi answered on
Apr 26 2020
Is Daniel Bell’s critique of electoral democracy convincing?
Table of Contents
DANIEL BELL’S CRITIQUE OF ELECTORAL DEMOCRACY 3
Electoral democracy is refers to the system developed by the government at the national and state level. It define people who have a right to chose their political leader or replace their leader in a regular, free and meaningful manner in the country. It provides a sufficient freedom for giving the elections which is meaningful, free and fair (Thompson, 2015). This report analysis the complete overview of critic has been given by the Daniel Bell in relation with electoral democracy. It analysis the various facts and informations that has been published in his book by which he explained his thoughts and point of view in front of the public related to the electoral democracy.
DANIEL BELL’S CRITIQUE OF ELECTORAL DEMOCRACY
As per the published book written by Daniel Bell related to the China model related to the political meritocracy and limit of democracy is a type of research that has been related to the twenty years ago situation in China (Bell, Bwanika, Cunningham, Gatton, González, Hopkins, Kibira, Kyabayinze, Mayxay, Ndawula and Newton, 2017). It also presents a good and great approach of adopting the various Chinese approaches which is related to the politics in an effective manner. There are various kinds of books has been written and published by the Bell but he does not promoter their work (Simmons, 2017). Apart from this, it was found that his mansion focus on the China model that highly describes the situation of various kinds of Contempary practices used by the Chinese party leadership in order to define the meritocracy condition in the country. Furthermore, he also focuses on the democracy situation particularly for the Chinese heritage societies but also make a complete analysis of the impact of the political parties in the whole world. According to Daniel Bell, if there is undetermined and unquestioned faith related to the democracy only shows the situation of normative defensive model of politics (Simmons, 2017). Anglophone political theorists: he's taking a non-Western, non-democratic political model seriously enough to draw out its normative and institutional implications within
oader debates about proper governance. For the maximum element he successfully avoids reductive essentialisms approximately East Asian culture via considering how the “China version” of centralized meritocracy, once suitably integrated with nea
y democratic mechanisms, would possibly produce a legitimate alternative to electoral democracy.
There are two reasons that does not connived the people with the thoughts of Daniel Bell. The first reason reflects the various kinds of evidence that create the problems related top the democracy. The reason behind is that Bell seems more seriously by taking the attribute of particular or special elements related to the Contempary American political system that has been classified into two-party system respectively which also showed the democracy system itself in his views (Bell, Bwanika, Cunningham, Gatton, González, Hopkins, Kibira, Kyabayinze, Mayxay, Ndawula and Newton, 2017). According to Bell, democracy is defined in a simpler manner such as one person has a right to give once vote only by taking the example of United State condition (Bell, Bwanika, Cunningham, Gatton, González, Hopkins, Kibira, Kyabayinze, Mayxay, Ndawula and Newton, 2017). Apart from this, Bell also...