Identify the problem. What is the environment? What is the situation? What are the options?...

Question

Identify the problem. 	 		What is the environment? 		What is the situation? 		What are the options? 	 	     	Identify the people and groups affected by choosing one of the above options. 	 		Individuals: self, boss, client, subordinate, etc. 		Groups: company, public, family, profession, etc. 	 	     	Build a decision framework – What is going to be the basis for my decision? 	 		Consequentialism – looking for good results or least harm 		 			What will be the result of the decision for me personally? 			How are the above people and groups affected? 			Are they affected negatively or positively? 		 		 		Deontology – duty and obligation 		 			How deep is my obligation to each of the people and groups? 			How do I prioritize conflicting duties? 		 		 		Virtue ethics – Who am I? 		 			What fundamental principles are in play? 			What norms or traditions I practice are being challenged? 			What personal values that I hold are being affected or threatened? 			 				Am I being asked to do something that I don’t believe in? 				Am I being asked to ignore something that I feel must be addressed? 			 			 		 		 	 	     	Make a decision 	 		Base your decision on values that are supported by principles 		Make a commitment to the decision 	 	     	Take action 	 		Do what you feel is right for the right reasons - Never mistake temptation for opportunity 		Let the chips fall where they may - A person who ignores wrong becomes either an accomplice or the next victim 	 	     	Learn 	 		Accept responsibility for your decision and your actions 		Understand the difference between providing explanations and making excuses 		Listen to feedback so you can learn from everyone’s mistakes 		Incorporate changes where possible to avoid similar situations in the future

Robert · Accepted Answer

Dothard v. Rawlinson

2013 
 
Hewlett-Packard
User
[Dothard v. Rawlinson] 
[Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of 
the contents of the document. Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is 
typically a short summary of the contents of the document.] 
Facts and issues of the case 
A female applicant named Dianne Rawlinson applied for an employment for the post of prison 
guard or correctional counselor in Alabama prison. Dianne was subsequently rejected for the 
post of prison guard on the grounds of failing to meet the minimum requirement of prospects of 
Title VII. Rawlinson had to file a grievance with Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 
order to claim discrimination of sex. The main issue which was aroused by Dianne was what 
type of method of providing Title VII case should she use in attacking the heights and weights 
requirement? The next issue is does she needs to use any one of the method to attack the second 
rule? Further what type of argument should state use if Dianne establishes that the basic 
requirement regarding height and weight have an adverse impact? And lastly what argument 
should the state have regarding the second rule? 
Identification and solution of problem 
The environment in the above case is very sensitive, as Dianne has been rejected to get the 
employment as a prison guard.

Identify the problem. What is the environment? What is the situation? What are the options? Identify the people and groups affected by choosing one of the above options. Individuals: self, boss,...

Solution

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

Submit New Assignment