Microsoft Word - CPDA Assessment and Feedback form
ignment Brief and Criteria
Gregory
%
Gregory
Gregory
Gregory
Gregory
Gregory
Gregory
Gregory
Gregory
Gregory
Assignment Brief (including Format)
Gregory
Gregory
Gregory
Gregory
Gregory
Gregory
Gregory
Course Learning Outcomes to be met through this Brief
Gregory
Equipment/Facilities/Resources required
Gregory
Gregory
Estimated Hours for completion
Gregory
Gregory
Date of Return of Assignments
Gregory
Course Leade
Gregory
Gregory
Gregory
Assessment Criteria
Gregory
Gregory
Categories
Gregory
Gregory
Gregory
Gregory
Gregory
1st (70+)
Gregory
Gregory
2: XXXXXXXXXX)
Gregory
Gregory
Gregory
Gregory
2: XXXXXXXXXX)
Gregory
Gregory
3rd (40-49)
Gregory
Gregory
Gregory
Fail (30-39)
Gregory
Gregory
Gregory
Serious Fail (-29)
Gregory
Gregory
Gregory
Date posted
Blank Page
Course Name: Storytelling for Film & Television
Course Code: CINE1109
Due in: 04/05/18
Brief: This is an individual assignment. Word count: 2,500 words.
Choose ONE film or TV production as a case study. Explore its storytelling in
elation to at least TWO other media / art forms.
These might include: painting, photography, theatre, dance, poetry, prose
fiction, music, installation art, etc.
Identify the genre/era/cinematic tradition of your case study and scenes.
Remember to consider the relevant areas in which visual
storytelling techniques may be displayed:
- Production Design
- Cinematography (camera/lighting)
- Actor performance and timing
- Sound/Music
- Editing
Format the essay in headed sections using visual illustrations to support you
arguments. Use Harvard referencing.
Learning Outcomes:
1. Contextualize film and television visuals in relation to other visual artistic
media such as photography, art, music and dance.
3. Undertake academic research exploring the creative context of film and television in both text and image based areas.
Equipment Facilities Resources: Li
ary resources (journals, articles, books, films) Box of Broadcasts.
Hours: 35
Assessment Task: Illustrated essay
Weighting: 50
Date of Return: 25/05/18
Tutor Name: Alison Cross
Category 1: Analysis
Category 2: Research
Category 3: Presentation
Category 4:
Category 5:
First C4:
First C2: Comprehensive
and detailed
esearch, showing
ability to
effectively use a
variety of sources
and to apply these in context.
First C5:
First C1: Well considered
analysis that
includes reference
to learning in class,
external examples
and perceptive,
critical discussion.
First C3: Excellent
communication
skills, clear use of
language and high
standard of
written English.
Outstanding
visuals that show
clear co
elation
etween image
and issue,
supported in the
text. Harvard
eferencing of
oad range of
sources.
2:1 C1: Analysis that shows interpolation of
learning through
class with
external examples,
making supported
arguments.
2:1 C2: Detailed research showing an ability to use a variety of sources, showing an ability to apply these in context.
2:1 C3: Good
communication
skills, few spelling
mistakes, good
standard of
written English.
Strong visuals
illustrating areas of
application and
differentiating
approaches. Harvard referencing of
source material.
2:1 C4:
2:1 C5:
2:2 C1: Some evidence of
engagement with
learning done in
classes and some reference to external examples. Evidence of some critical engagement.
2:2 C2: Research indicating an understanding of research concepts, if sometimes not following through sources with appropriate application
2:2 C3: Adequate level of writing skills and presentation shown. Some visuals that illustrate aspects of application and ways of approaching the production. May lack a sense of understanding or direct co
elation between image and idea. Some evidence of Harvard referencing of sources.
2:2 C4:
2:2 C5:
Third C1: Limited evidence of engagement with class material and how this relates to external examples. Lack of critical engagement.
Third C2: Some research evident, but with little co
elation to the production or limited critical understanding.
Third C3: Readable work that expresses basic understanding of presentation of written material. Few visuals that are relevant or indicate an understanding of practice. Referencing is inconsistent and limited in scope.
Third C4:
Third C5:
Fail C1: Insufficient evidence of engagement with class activities. Inability to relate or class material to external examples. Absence of a critical voice, justified thoughts or conclusions.
Fail C2: Little or no research evident, or i
elevant to the production, with poor critical understanding.
Fail C3: Poorly expressed, with few sources. Few or no visuals that indicate the link to practical work or that illustrate the text. Poor referencing, work uncited or paraphrased without acknowledgement.
Fail C4:
Fail C5:
Serious Fail C1: No evidence of engagement with class activities or critical thought.
Serious Fail C2: No indication of research or critical understanding.
Serious Fail C3: Incoherent reading, poor or no visuals that are relevant. No referencing or sources cited.
Serious Fail C4:
Date of Brief Publication: September 2017
Serious Fail C5:
Lock: