Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

COURSE CODE M3402 Your answers must not exceed 2000 words for the whole paper. You are recommended to devote no more than 1,000 words to the total answer for each section. Candidates must attempt TWO...

1 answer below »


Your answers must not exceed 2000 words for the whole paper.
You are recommended to devote no more than 1,000 words to the total answer for each section.

Candidates must attempt TWO questions, the
ONE question from Section A and ONE from Section B

    M3402     Law of Tort

Answer both part (a) and part (b)

1. Brightelm NHS Trust have asked for your advice on the following two cases:

(a) Mrs Wood is seeking damages for a recognised psychiatric illness which she developed after the negligent treatment of her five-year old daughter, Sarah. Sarah had tripped and fallen over in the playground at school and been unconscious for a few minutes. Mrs Wood
ought her to the Accident and Emergency Department. Sarah had a head scan but Dr Green failed to see that she had had a bleed on her
ain and discharged her. Sarah complained of headaches and became increasingly incoherent. Three days later, after a conversation with her GP, Mrs Wood took Sarah back to the hospital. The scan was reviewed and the bleed identified which required urgent surgery. Waiting for a theatre to become available, ten hours later Sarah suffered a further bleed from which she died. Advise, drawing from appropriate authority, Brightelm NHS Trust whether they owe Mrs Wood a duty of care.


(b) Mr and Mrs Skye are seeking damages for a recognised psychiatric illness arising from the events su
ounding the birth of their daughter, Isla. The labour progressed very slowly but the midwife, Aran, reassured them that all was well because the monitor showed that the baby’s heartbeat was strong. When the consultant a
ived after 16 hours of labour she saw that the monitor was inco
ectly fitted and it became apparent that the baby’s heart was not beating. When Isla was born she was not
eathing and it was later established that she had suffered severe
ain damage from oxygen deprivation during birth. Given the differences in the heartbeat of an adult and a baby it should have been obvious to a competent midwife that the monitor was inco
ectly fitted. Advise, drawing from appropriate authority, Brightelm NHS Trust whether they owe Mr and Mrs Skye a duty of care.
    M3402     Law of Tort


1. Explain and discuss the extent to which recent Supreme Court cases such as James-Bowen v Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis [2018] UKSC 40 and Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2018] UKSC 4 provide clear guidance on the nature and function of duty of care in negligence.

This is the assessment guidance that you can use to identify the required structure to complete the essay questions
You have just started as a trainee in the personal injury department of a law firm. One of the senior partners has asked you to write a memo in preparation for a client meeting later that day. As the meeting is taking place soon you will only have an hour to write this memo, which is not enough time to ask any of your colleagues for help or consult any legal materials. Therefore, you are going to have to do this from memory. The partner gave you the following summary of the situation:
‘Our client, Edward, is 17 and had just passed his test when he was involved in a car accident, which another driver (Geoffrey) has admitted to causing by his negligence. Edward suffered abdominal injuries in the accident that required an operation. Edward consented to have an operation but said he had recently decided to join a religious group which prohibits its followers from receiving blood in medical treatment. He said ‘no blood’ before lapsing into unconsciousness. Unable to speak with his parents about Edward’s views, the surgeon, Mr Bates, gave Edward a transfusion of a pint of blood, without which Edward would have died. Mr Bates then decided to attempt a recently developed technique which he had
iefly read about the day before in the latest edition of the medical journal, Gut Repair. Four hours into the operation, Mr Bates realised that he didn’t fully understand the new procedure and decided to resort to the conventional technique, which is the one he had mentioned to Edward while he was
iefly conscious. A few minutes later Edward suffered a cardiac a
est and will be left with permanent
ain damage. Had Mr Bates adopted the conventional technique from the outset, Edward stood a 40% chance of making a full recovery’.
The senior partner also made the following observations:
· Remind me of the essential elements for a successful claim in negligence.
· Old cases (e.g. Donoghue and Anns) probably are not relevant. So, stick to more recent cases - it is not as though we are dealing with a novel situation.
· Of course, the surgeon was a professional (unlike Geoffrey) and our client’s chances of survival were not great anyway. So that will need to be addressed.
· Has any battery been committed?
You are required to write the text of a memorandum discussing the tortious issues which arise in the scenario involving Edward being sure to mention any relevant case law.
End of Pape
Indicative guidance for this question – what your plan might have contained - a good quality full answer would have built upon these points, supporting arguments with discussion of case law. It is vital that you consider relevant case law in depth and apply the law to the facts. Which cases you will need to consider will depend upon the point you wish to make. We do not, therefore, list below all of those that may be relevant to your answer.  Part of the exercise is for you to make a judgement about which cases best support the argument you wish to make
In order to attain at least a pass mark you would be expected to:
1) Identify that in order for a claim in negligence to be successful the alleged tortfeasor must have owed the claimant a duty of care, which was
eached and that
each caused the harm/damage suffered by the claimant. A better answer would involve clear recognition that both legal and factual causation are required as well as the absence of a defence.
2) Establish that Mr Bates owed Edward a duty of care. In the context of the question detailed discussion of the three-stage test in Caparo is not central. Discussion of very early cases such as Donoghue are not relevant in the context of the question (nor is mention of ove
uled cases such as Anns). Any discussion of whether or not Geoffrey was negligent was also i
elevant as this has been admitted.
3) Discuss whether or not Mr Bates
eached his duty of care, with reference to some relevant case law.
4) Discuss the impact that Edward only had a 40% chance of surviving with reference to some relevant case law.
Stronger answers went beyond the above core expectations and, in addition, discussed matters such as the following in greater detail:
5) Geoffrey remains liable unless novus actus interveniens (legal causation).
6) Mr Bates’ duty based on precedent not three-stage test (Caparo).
7) Discussed in more depth the Bolam/Bolitho test as applied to Mr Bates.
8) ‘But-For test’ not satisfied with less than 50% chance (Barnett/Wilshe
9) Discussion of potential battery – consent, necessity
10) Discussion of the importance of obtaining informed consent (Montgomery)
Very strong answers also considered contributory negligence (and some vicarious liability, although this was not expected as the topic isn’t covered until the Spring term).
In terms of actual performance, the best answers (marks in the 60s and above) engaged well with the elements of the question, drew upon appropriate case law and engaged with and applied to this scenario the legal reasoning of cases. Other answers co
ectly identified the tortious areas but didn’t develop them as fully – these would have slipped into the lower marking bands. Some missed one or more of the tortious areas or key cases, thereby reducing the scope for potential marks, and/or engaged in discussion of matters which were not relevant/central.
A few of the weaker answers were very muddled about the legal issues. A few candidates wrote at significant length but the content contained virtually nothing other than a repetition of the facts and very general observations without legal content.
A lot of the students who received fail marks demonstrated little knowledge of the law and/or a lack of engagement with primary sources. In that latter context, if you say something relevant but do not support it with case authority then it counts for little more than your own opinion – when dealing with the law of tort, we need to know where you are getting the law from, so an answer to this question with few/no cases discussed isn’t going to achieve many marks.
A few answers threw in what seemed like more or less everything that had been revised, i
espective of whether or not this had relevance to the question. It is very difficult to convince the markers that you really understand tort if you take this approach.
Another reason for some low marks was writing far too little. There is no set expected length for an answer - different students write more or less concisely, have larger or small handwriting etc. – but as a rule of thumb, those students who received a high mark needed around three to four or more sides of substantive material (i.e. discounting repetition of the facts, i
elevant material and suchlike) to do justice to this question.
Answered Same Day Jun 09, 2021


Rupsha answered on Jun 11 2021
109 Votes
Section A
[footnoteRef:2]The case of MRS Wood is critical and we have to dissect it step by step to reach a conclusion. The English law has not been very kind to the cases of medical negligence claims for psychiatric illness by close relatives of patients. The verdict of the case of Liverpool women's hospital NHS Foundation versus Ronayne is the latest instance of it. [2: Andrew S. Bu
ows and John H. Bu
There is a difference between primary victims and secondary victims in such cases. A primary victim is a person who has been injured or hazarded physically and developed psychiatric illness in consequence. A secondary victim is a relative of the injured patient who has developed psychiatric illness in consequence of the death or injury of the patient. 120 The victim, be it primary or secondary, has to prove that he or she is suffering from a recognised psychiatric illness. Then the victim has to prove his illness is caused by the negligence of the defendant. Some conditions have been imposed by the court in case of secondary victims, which is known as control mechanism. This regulation emphasizes on examining the secondary victims properly as there can be situations where many of the relatives of the patient can seek damage for organised psychiatric illness. Therefore, it has to be examined whether Mrs Wood is right about her condition or not.
If Mr Wood can prove his condition, should have to go through to some more examinations. In such cases, the secondary victim has to prove three conditions - 1. The victim has to prove that he or she had close proximity or addition of affection with the patient, 2. He has to prove that he was in the place of the incident during its occu
ence, 3. She has to prove that he so to heard the situation himself rather than hearing it from someone else. 302 it would be easier for Mrs Wood to prove his dynamics with the patient, as she is the mother of the patient. The hospital record or the CCTV footage proves that she was present in the hospital during the occu
ence of the incident. The medical reports of Sarah prove that Dr Green failed to recognise her condition of bleeding and the criticality of it. Therefore, it is not relevant whether Mrs Wood was present at the time of the head scan or not because the process and the result of the head scan, is out there for all to see in the medical reports. When the bleeding was at last proved and Sarah needed an urgent surgery, the hospital failed to provide him operation theatre immediately, which can also be proven from the reports. It is evident that the hospital management failed to deliver their promise not once but twice and this led to the death of Sarah. All the official reports indicate the mammoth failure of the hospital. 469 Their responsibility has caused a great loss to a family and a great shock to his mother, which can induce her to develop psychiatric illness in all possibilities. Therefore, in my opinion, NHS Trust must serve Mrs Wood a duty of care.
[footnoteRef:3]B. [3: Daniele, Bryden and Ian, Storey. “Duty of care and medical negligence.” (2011). https:
jaed/article/11/4/124/266921 Accessed 11th June 2020
In this case, duty of care is a responsibility of a medical organisation towards a primary or secondary victim. The case of Mr and Mrs Skye is a bit critical. The incidents have to be observed and dissected carefully to reach a conclusion. Looking at the trend of the verdicts of such cases in UK it might seem that it would not go in fever of Mr and Mrs Skye. The latest instance is the case of Liverpool women's hospital NHS Foundation versus Ronayne. Still, an honest and detailed investigation can
ing the justice. In this project, we will discuss some points, which would help me to form my opinion and give an advice to NHS foundation.
Firstly, the difference between primary and secondary victims should be discussed as they are treated differently. A person who is physically...

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here