Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_B1ztndzQk&t=7s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1-cs2dqVDA Document A: Molly Elliot Seawell (Modifed) It has often been pointed out that women should not pass laws on...

1 answer below »
https:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_B1ztndzQk&t=7s
https:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1-cs2dqVDA
Document A: Molly Elliot Seawell (Modifed)
It has often been pointed out that women should not pass laws on
matters of war and peace, since no woman can do military duty. But
this point applies to other issues, too. No woman can have any
practical knowledge of shipping and navigation, of the work of trainmen on railways, of mining, or of many other subjects of the highest
importance. Their legislation, therefore, would not be intelligent, and
the laws they devised to help sailors, trainmen, miners, etc., might be
highly offensive to the very people they tried to help. If sailors and
miners refused to obey the laws, who would have to enforce them?
The men!
The entire execution of the law would be in the hands of men, backed
up by i
esponsible voters (women) who could not lift a finger to catch
or punish a criminal. And if all the dangers and difficulties of
executing the law lay upon men, what right have women to make the
law?
Also, there seems to be a close relationship between suffrage and
divorce. Political differences in families, between
others, fo
example, who vote on differing sides, do not promote harmony. How
much more inharmonious must be political differences between a
husband and wife, each of whom has a vote which may be used as a
weapon against the other? What is likely to be the state of that family,
when the husband votes one ticket, and the wife votes another?
Source: Excerpt from Molly Elliot Seawell, an anti-suffragist from
Virginia who published the anti-suffrage book, The Ladies’ Battle, in
1911.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document B: Anti-Suffrage Newspaper in New York (Modified)
The Suffragists’ ideal is a kitchen-less house. The Suffragist keeps
writing and speaking about pots and pans, and denounces
housekeeping as degrading. The Suffragists teach women to revolt
against the daily task of tending child and house, and we sadly see
the results in the nation’s poor health and lowered physique. It is the
Suffragist theory that women’s sphere in life should be the same as
the man’s. Is it not clear how this hideous feminism is sapping ou
vitality as a nation? Is it too much to say that it lies at the root of half
the sickness and disease in our country?
There are many wealthy women who support Suffragism, and who do
a very dangerous thing in preaching to working women that
housework is degrading. As long as a working woman keeps he
home clean and well tended, she enjoys the high regard of he
neighbors. Yet, now the more weak-minded have been influenced by
the Suffragists’ sno
ish preaching. Such feminism is destroying ou
national character and warping the natural impulses and beliefs that
make a woman’s life such a beautiful work of art.
Source: Article from an anti-suffrage newspaper, The Woman’s
Protest Against Woman’s Suffrage, published in New York by the
National Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage, in October 1912.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document C: Tennessee Representative John A. Moon (Modified)
It has been insisted that the real purpose of this amendment is to
deprive the Southern States of representation in part in Congress....
In those Southern States where the colored population outnumbers
the white, to double the number of ignorant voters by giving the
colored woman the right to vote would produce a condition that would
e absolutely intolerable. We owe something to the wishes and the
sentiments of the people of our sister States struggling to maintain
law and order and white supremacy....
We are engaged now in a great foreign war. It is not the proper time
to change the whole electoral system... Patriotism, in my judgment,
fo
ids the injection of this issue into national politics at this time.
Source: Representative John A. Moon of Tennessee, speech in
House of Representatives, January 10, 1918, on the issue of the
woman suffrage amendment.
Task 3: Please answer the CHQ in three paragraphs response.
CHQ: Why did people, including women, oppose woman suffrage?
1-Please make sure to cite textual evidence.
2-Please make sure to connect to previous topics
3-Please defend your point of views accordingly!
Answered Same Day Aug 03, 2021

Solution

Sumita Mitra answered on Aug 04 2021
159 Votes
3
Reasons on why actually People including the women opposed the woman suffrage:
To highlight the basics, it can be said that the suffrage movement came up after lot of struggle and revolution in the United states, which gave the right to vote to the women. This was an outcome of the anti-slavery movement. The era of discrimination and oppression led to the suffrage movement in the United states. It was the struggle for the right of women to vote and run for office and is part of the overall women’s rights movement and giving them the power to be at par with men and also shoulder the responsibilities outside of their home.
The women mostly opposed the suffrage as they were reluctant to vote. The opposition to suffrage was actually based on certain thoughts and factors within the minds of the women folks. Moreover, it was seen that the contribution of women votes never led to any social...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here