Hoolie is a (fictional) big data company which profits from novel insights gained from user’s personal data. Suppose that Hoolie is (magically) able to ensure that all user data is completely anonymized.
Set out the best argument you can that Hoolie has a right to profit from these insights because it owns the anonymized data.* Then set out and evaluate the objection based on Floridi's account of personal data which Sax raises for this argument (i.e., the objection in the 'Divisibility of personal data' section pp. 29-30).
Already registered? Login
Not Account? Sign up
Enter your email address to reset your password
Back to Login? Click here