Assessment Three. Final Design (30% of unit marks): Length = 4-5 pages written + visuals + Concept Page
CRITERIA
HD
D
C
P
F
Concept Page (10%)
Who (4%)
~1 page + visual(s)
Who is the design for (community focus)?
Who is the design for (within the community)?
Who is the design for (focussed on your chosen end-user)?
Who are your stakeholders?
Who will build and maintain it?
Expertly addresses all 5 Who questions listed to the left
AND
Includes at least 3 unique references (at least two are from a sources other than EWB)
AND
Includes one or more high quality AND appropriate visuals (figure and/or tables)
Adequately addresses all 5 Who questions listed to the left
AND
Includes at least 3 unique references (at least one is from a source other than EWB)
AND
Includes one or more high quality AND appropriate visuals (figure and/or tables)
Adequately addresses 4 of the 5 Who questions listed to the left
AND
Includes at least 2 unique references (at least one is from a source other than EWB)
AND
Includes one or more adequate quality AND appropriate visuals (figure and/or tables)
Adequately addresses 3 of the 5 Who questions listed to the left
AND
Includes at least 2 unique references
OR
Includes one or more low quality OR NOT appropriate visuals (figure and/or tables)
Poorly addresses OR fails to address 3 or more of the 5 Who questions listed to the left
OR
Does NOT include references
OR
Lacks visuals
What (4%)
~1 page + visual(s)
What is your design and how does it work?
What is it made of?
What are the benefits and drawbacks of your design?
What problems might you face in trying to implement your design (and how could you overcome them)?
Expertly addresses all 4 What questions listed to the left
AND
Includes at least 3 unique references (at least two are from a sources other than EWB)
AND
Includes one or more high quality AND appropriate visuals (figure and/or tables)
Adequately addresses all 4 What questions listed to the left
AND
Includes at least 3 unique references (at least one is from a source other than EWB)
AND
Includes one or more high quality AND appropriate visuals (figure and/or tables)
Adequately addresses 3 of the 4 What questions listed to the left
AND
Includes at least 2 unique references (at least one is from a source other than EWB)
AND
Includes one or more adequate quality AND appropriate visuals (figure and/or tables)
Adequately addresses 2 of the 4 What questions listed to the left
AND
Includes at least 2 unique references
OR
Includes one or more low quality OR NOT appropriate visuals (figure and/or tables)
Poorly addresses OR fails to address 3 or more of the 4 What questions listed to the left
OR
Does NOT include references
OR
Lacks visuals
CRITERIA
HD
D
C
P
F
Where (1%)
~1/4 page + visual(s)
Where will your design go (within the community)?
Where else might your design work (within the community or its vicinity, regionally and/or globally)?
Expertly addresses BOTH of the Where questions listed to the left
AND
Includes at least 1 reference
AND
Includes one or more high quality AND appropriate visuals (figure and/or tables)
Adequately addresses BOTH of the Where questions listed to the left
AND
Includes at least 1 reference
AND
Includes one or more adequate quality AND appropriate visuals (figure and/or tables)
Adequately addresses BOTH of the Where questions listed to the left
AND
Includes at least 1 reference
AND
Lacks visuals
Poorly addresses OR fails to address ONE of the Where questions listed to the left
AND
Includes at least 1 reference
OR
Lacks visuals
Poorly addresses OR fails to address BOTH of the Where questions listed to the left
OR
Does NOT include references
OR
Lacks visuals
When (1%)
~1/4 page + visual(s)
When will your design be built and how long will it take to build it?
When will the community begin to realise the benefits of the design (and how long will the design continue to function)?
Expertly addresses BOTH of the When questions listed to the left
AND
Includes at least 1 reference
AND
Includes one or more high quality AND appropriate visuals (figure and/or tables)
Adequately addresses BOTH of the When questions listed to the left
AND
Includes at least 1 reference
AND
Includes one or more adequate quality AND appropriate visuals (figure and/or tables)
Adequately addresses BOTH of the When questions listed to the left
AND
Includes at least 1 reference
AND
Lacks visuals
Poorly addresses OR fails to address ONE of the When questions listed to the left
AND
Includes at least 1 reference
AND
Lacks visuals
Poorly addresses OR fails to address BOTH of the When questions listed to the left
OR
Does NOT include references
OR
Lacks visuals
Why (4%)
~1 page + visual(s)
Why is your design the best design (need to critically evaluate your design and explain why it is a good one)?
Why did you select the materials you did to build it (that is, why are they the best materials for the job)?
Expertly addresses BOTH of the Why questions listed to the left
AND
Includes at least 3 unique references (at least two are from a sources other than EWB)
AND
Includes one or more high quality AND appropriate visuals (figure and/or tables)
Adequately addresses BOTH of the Why questions listed to the left
AND
Includes at least 3 unique references (at least one is from a source other than EWB)
AND
Includes one or more high quality AND appropriate visuals (figure and/or tables)
Adequately addresses BOTH of the Why questions listed to the left
AND
Includes at least 2 unique references (at least one is from a source other than EWB)
AND
Includes one or more adequate quality AND appropriate visuals (figure and/or tables)
Poorly addresses ONE of the Why questions listed to the left
AND
Includes at least 2 unique references
OR
Includes one or more low quality OR NOT appropriate visuals (figure and/or tables)
Poorly addresses OR fails to address BOTH of the Why questions listed to the left
OR
Does NOT include references
OR
Lacks visuals
CRITERIA
HD
D
C
P
F
How (4%)
~1 page + visual(s)
How will your design be constructed?
How does it meet the design challenge and address the main problem(s)?
How does your design demonstrate the principles of humanitarian engineering and ethical engineering?
How would you ensure stakeholder engagement in your design?
Expertly addresses all 4 How questions listed to the left
AND
Includes at least 3 unique references (at least two are from a sources other than EWB)
AND
Includes one or more high quality AND appropriate visuals (figure and/or tables)
Adequately addresses all 4 How questions listed to the left
AND
Includes at least 3 unique references (at least one is from a source other than EWB)
AND
Includes one or more high quality AND appropriate visuals (figure and/or tables)
Adequately addresses 3 of the 4 How questions listed to the left
AND
Includes at least 2 unique references (at least one is from a source other than EWB)
AND
Includes one or more adequate quality AND appropriate visuals (figure and/or tables)
Adequately addresses 2 of the 4 How questions listed to the left
AND
Includes at least 2 unique references
OR
Includes one or more low quality OR NOT appropriate visuals (figure and/or tables)
Poorly addresses OR fails to address 3 or more of the 4 How questions listed to the left
OR
Does NOT include references
OR
Lacks visuals
Report writing (2%)
1) Demonstrates high level report writing skills including structure, grammar, and spelling.
2) Format is of a professional standard and consistent throughout the report.
Grammar, sentence and paragraph structure, punctuation and spelling are well above expected level.
AND
Language enhances the readers understanding.
AND
Format is consistent AND of a professional standard.
Grammar, sentence and paragraph structure, punctuation and spelling are above expected level.
AND
Language facilitates the readers understanding.
AND
Format is consistent AND of a high standard.
Grammar, sentence and paragraph structure, punctuation and spelling are at expected level.
AND
Language does not inhibit readers understanding.
AND
Format is consistent AND of an adequate standard.
Grammar, sentence and paragraph structure, punctuation and spelling are below expected level.
AND/OR
Language sometimes inhibits understanding.
AND/OR
Format is mostly consistent AND of an adequate standard.
Grammar, sentence and paragraph structure, punctuation and spelling are well below expected level.
OR
Language is confusing and difficult to understand.
OR
Format is inconsistent between contributors OR of poor standard.
CRITERIA
HD
D
C
P
F
Referencing (modifies marks of other sub-sections)
1) All of the above sections will also be evaluated based on your ability to find support materials upon which to base your work.
2) NOTE: please refer to the video series to learn how to use search engines and how to determine the QUALITY of references.
Information sources - variety used and appropriate to the scope and discipline of the research question.
AND
Source selection uses multiple criteria.
Information sources -
variety used and appropriate to the scope and discipline of the research question.
AND
Source selection uses multiple criteria.
Information sources -
variety used.
AND
Source selection uses basic criteria.
Information sources -
a few used.
AND
Source selection uses limited criteria.
Information sources -
none used.
OR
Source selection uses no obvious criteria.
Plagiarism (modifies final mark)
1) Plagiarism has the potential to impact on your overall mark for this assignment.
2) The way in which plagiarism will affect your mark explained here.
3) ONLY the person responsible for the plagiarised sections will be penalised.
No evidence of plagiarism.
AND
All ideas, figures and tables not your own are sourced.
AND
TURNITIN does not identify any instances where you have used the words of others.
NO CHANGE in your mark.
No evidence of deliberate plagiarism.
AND
Nearly all ideas, figures and tables not your own are sourced.
AND
TURNITIN identifies a few instances where you have used the words of others (whether sourced or not).
NO CHANGE in your mark.
Limited evidence of deliberate plagiarism.
AND
Nearly all ideas, figures and tables not your own are sourced.
AND
TURNITIN identifies few instances where you have used the words of others (whether sourced or not).
NO CHANGE in your mark.
Some evidence of deliberate plagiarism.
AND
Sometimes lacks sources for ideas, figures and tables not your own.
OR
TURNITIN identifies some instances where you have used the words of others (whether sourced or not).
A 10%-20% PENALTY will apply.
Evidence of deliberate plagiarism.
AND
Consistently lacks sources for ideas, figures and tables not your own.
OR
TURNITIN identifies many instances where you have used the words of others (whether sourced or not).
AUTOMATIC failure of the assignment and the unit.