Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Differences and the CAGE Distance Framework, make a summary of this article.

1 answer below »
Microsoft Word - Differences and the CAGE Distance FrameworkFeb2012
(c) P



This
iden
mus

Beg
plot
dist
Ben
wha
the

Wal



















The
fou
Eco
ankaj Ghemaw
2. Dif
s note intro
ntify and p
st address w
gin by cons
ts Walmart
ance betwe
ntonville, A
at other type
markets tha
lmart Intern

e CAGE dis
major c
onomic. Diff

wat / For copyrig
fferences an
oduces the
ioritize the
when develo
sidering the
t’s operatin
een each co
kansas. Th
es of differe
at were prof
national’s O
tance frame
categories:
fferences alo
ght permissions
nd the CAG
Pankaj Gh
CAGE dist
e differences
oping cross-
e example
ng margin
ountry’s cap
he impact of
ence or dist
fitable for W
Exhibi
Operating M
ework disag
Cultural,
ong these di
s, please e-mail
GE Distanc
hemawat
tance frame
s between c
-border strat
summarize
y count
pital and W
f geographic
ance can yo
Walmart from
it 2-1
Margin by Co
ggregates di
Administra
imensions g
globecourse@g
ce Framewo
ework, whi
countries th
tegies.2
d in exhibi
y in 2004
Walmart’s he
c distance is
ou identify t
m those tha
ountry (200
istance or di
ative, Geog
generally ha
ghemawat.com
ork1
ich is used
hat compani
it 2-1, whi
4 against t
eadquarters
s obvious,
that separat
at weren’t?
4 estimates
ifference int
graphic, a
ave a negati
m
to
ies
ich
the
in
ut
ted
)
to
and
ive
effe
diff
enco
type

ect on man
ferences alo
ourage rath
es of differe
 Cultura
eliefs,
of the
organiz
eligiou
values.
market
effects,
usines
markets
least, tie

 Adminis
etween
tenor o
exchang
differen
course,
country
levels o
profita
States i
Free T
as clas
uninco

 Geogra
involve
other: o
country
access t
1 make
profita

ny cross-bo
ong a limit
her than disc
ence or dista
al distance:
values, and
game—th
zations. Cu
us beliefs,
Societies
power and
oth form
sses operat
s share ling
es through l
strative dis
n countries
of cu
ent
ge between
nces along
do admin
y such as au
of co
uption
le countrie
in a region
ade Agreem
ssified by
porated te
aphic distan
es more tha
other attri
y’s physica
to the ocean
es it clear th
le “count
order inte
ed subset o
courage suc
ance is illus
: Culture c
d social no
hat shape
ultural dista
ace/ethnicit
even diffe
d globaliza
mally via re
e. 4 Interes
guistic, reli
large diaspo
stance: Hi
s—colonial
elationsh
n them—w
these dime
nistrative a
utarchic pol
n. In the Wa
es, Canada a
nal free trad
ment (NAFT
Walmart,
itory of the
nce: The g
an just how
utes to be
al size, wit
n, topograph
hat the cap
ies” is ge
actions, al
of CAGE d
ch interactio
strated by th
an be defin
ms—the un
the behavi
ance encom
ty, languag
er in their
ation in wa
egulation a
stingly, Wa
gious and
ora.
storical an
links, free
hips—profou
which is th
ensions mat
attributes s
licies or we
almart exam
and Mexico
de agreeme
TA). And a
, Puerto R
e United Sta
geographic
w far two c
e considere
thin-country
hy, and eve
ital city of
eographicall
though in
dimensions
ons.3 Each o
he Walmart
ned as the
nwritten, un
ior of ind
mpasses d
ge, and soci
social attit
ays that ha
and informa
almart’s fo
ethnic simi
nd political
e trade ag
undly affe
he same as
tter a great
specific to
eak instituti
mple, note th
o, partner wi
ent, the No
third profit
Rico, is
ates.
dimension
countries a
ed include
y distances
en time zon
f each of W
ly closer t
some case
can actual
of these
o
example.
collection
nspoken rul
dividuals a
differences
ial norms a
tudes towa
ave importa
ally, on ho
our profita
ilarities or,
associatio
eements, t
ect econom
s saying th
t deal. So,
a particul
ions and hi
hat two of t
ith the Unit
th Americ
table “count
officially
n of distan
e from ea
contiguity,
s to borde
nes. Exhibit
Walmart’s fo
to Walma
2
es,
lly
oad
of
les
and
in
and
ard
ant
ow
le
at
ons
the
mic
hat
of
lar
gh
the
ted
can
try”
an
nce
ach
a
ers,
2-
our
t’s

Wha

Inte
grav
inte
etw
econ
ela
attri
diff
of o
and









headqua
addition
the Uni
 Econom
labor a
econom
in avail
comple
harder f
numbe
econom
liability
procurin
distance
its enti
strategi
at the Num
ernational e
vitation to
eractions. T
ween two co
nomic size
ated to the p
ibute). Aug
ferences as w
one such an
economic e

arters than
n, Canada a
ited States.
mic distance
are the m
mic distance
lability (or
ments, and
for Walma
of data p
mic distance
y for Walm
ng merch
e, particula
ire internati
es in section
ers Tell Us
economists
o describe
Thus, the s
ountries pre
s (a unilate
physical dist
gmented gra
well as unil
nalysis that
effects on t
the capitals
and Mexico
e: Consume
most obviou
e between c
lack) of re
d organizat
t to do wel
points is v
e has not
mart. The
andise fro
ly in terms
ional store
n 5, which d
s
have ada
trade an
implest gra
edicts that t
eral attribu
tance betwe
avity mode
lateral attri
evaluated c
ade.
s of any of
o share a co
er wealth an
us (and re
ountries. O
esources, in
tional capa
ll in poorer
very limite
een entire
company
om China—
s of labor co
network. W
discusses a
apted Newt
nd othe
avity mode
trade will be
ute of each
een them (a
els add mea
utes. Exhi
cultural, adm
the unprofi
ommon land
nd income a
elated) det
thers includ
nputs, infra
abilities. It
countries—
d. Note, h
ely or even
saves mo
—exploitin
osts—than i
We will re
itrage.
ton’s law
internationa
el of intern
e directly re
country) a
a bilateral o
asures of o
it 2-2 show
ministrative
table ones;
d border wi
and the cost
erminants
de differenc
astructure a
seems a
—although t
however, th
n primarily
e money
ng econom
it makes fro
eturn to su
of univers
al econom
national tra
elated to the
and inverse
country-pa
other types
ws the resu
e, geograph
3
in
ith
of
of
ces
and
it
the
hat
y a
y
mic
om
uch
sal
mic
ade
eir
ely
air
of
ults
hic,
D
D
C

A




G




E
Exh
Dimensions o
Distance/Prox
Cultural
Administrative
Geographic
Economic

Sou
Inte
Busi

The
signi
many

The
you
glo
mag
colo
with
ties
effe
orig
that
such

Sim
help
Thu
coun
hibit 2-2 Effe
of
ximity
e
ce: Pankaj
national Trad
iness School B
estimates co
ificant at the 1
y other studie
e signs on m
ur intuition
alized “fla
gnitudes of
onial ties a
hout them,
in generat
ects decades
ginal coloni
t complete
h considerat
milarities ve
p explain fo
us, for U.S.
ntry is Cana

cts of Simila

Determina
Common la

Common re
Colony/colo
Common cu
Differences

Physical dis
Physical siz
Landlocked
Common la

Economic s
Income leve
Ghemawat a
de Networks:
Boston, Fe
ua
ect for uno
1% level but a
es, apparently
most of the
s (although
at” world).
f some of t
e apt to t
or even mo
ting cultura
s and, in s
ial relations
globalizatio
tions—is ex
sus differe
oreign direc
companies
ada 60 perc
arities Versus
ant
anguage
egional trading
onizer links
u
ency
s in co
uption
stance: 1% inc
ze: 1% increas
dness
and border
size: GDP (1%
el: GDP per ca
and Rajiv Ma
A Gravity-B
ary 2003.
served thresh
are, in a num
due to the co
e estimates
h they ca
What are
the effects—
ade almost
ore if one al
al similariti
ome instan
ships were
on—as in t
xtremely un
ences along
ct investme
s that opera
cent of the t
s Difference
g bloc
n
crease
se
% increase)
apita (1% inc
Mallick, “The
ased Approac
holds for part
er of cases, s
ection
in the ta
nnot be re
probably m
—for exam
t three time
lso account
ies! The pe
nces, more
dissolved
the disappe
nlikely anyti
many of th
ent or comp
ate in just o
time (and 10
s on Bilatera
ease)
Industry-Lev
ch,” working
icipation in t
smaller than t
le probably
econciled w
more surp
mple, that c
es as much
ts for the ro
ersistence o
than a cent
einforce th
earance of t
ime soon.
he same dim
panies’ fore
one foreign
0 percent of
al Trade

Chan
+42%

+47%
+188
+114
–11%

–1.1%
–0.2%
–48%
+125

+0.8%
+0.7%
vel Structure
paper, Harva
ade and are
those reported
y accord wi
with a ful
ising are t
ountries wi
h as countri
ole of colon
of such la
tury after t
he conclusi
the effects
mensions al
eign presenc
country, th
f the time it
4
nge in Trade
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
of
ard
all
d in
ith
lly
the
ith
ies
nial
ge
the
on
of
lso
ce.
hat
t is
the
cros
tran
and
is th
mat

Iden

Hav
dist
fram
acco
ega
of th

Exh
Cou
(bila
Cou
(uni
United Kin
ss-border i
nsactions, p
even the in
hat differen
tter in signif
ntifying and
ving highlig
ances, the
mework to
ounted for
ard by ident
he CAGE c
hibit 2-3 The
untry pairs
ateral)
untries
ilateral)
ngdom).5 G
nteractions
atent citatio
ncidence of
nces betwee
ficant, predi
d Prioritizin
ghted the pe
est of this
identify a
in developi
tifying bilat
categories.
CAGE Fram
Cultural
Distance
 Different
languages
 Different
ethnicities;
lack of
connective
ethnic or
social
networks
 Different
eligions
 Lack of tru
 Different
values, no
and
disposition
 Insularity
 Traditional
avity mode
as divers
ons, immig
wars! The
en countries
ictable way
ng Differenc
ersistent imp
section foc
and prioriti
ing global s
teral and un
mework at the
Admin
Distan

ust
ms,
ns
 Lack o
ties
 Lack o
egion
loc
 Lack o
cu
en
 Politic
lism
 Nonma
econom
ias vs
ias)
 Lack o
membe
interna
organiz
 Weak
co
up
els have also
e as equit
grant flows,
asic conclu
s—and diff
ys.
ces
pact of cros
cuses on us
ize the dif
strategies. E
nilateral fac
e Country Le
nistrative
nce
of colonial
of shared
al trading
of common
cy
al hostility




arket/closed
my (home
s. foreign
of
ership in
ational
zations
institutions,
tion





o been adap
ty trading,
air traffic,
usion from
ferences in
ss-country d
sing the CA
fferences t
Exhibit 2-3
ctors to cons
evel
Geographic
Distance
 Physical dista
 Lack of land
 Differences in
zones
 Differences in
climates / dise
environments
 Landlockedne
 Lack of intern
navigability
 Geographic si
 Geographic
emoteness
 Weak transpo
or communic
links
pted to expla
e-comme
, phone cal
this literatu
differences—
differences
AGE distan
that must
helps in th
sider for ea
c Eco
Dis
ance
order
n time
n
ease
s
 Ric
diff
 Oth
diff
cos
of n
eso
fina
eso
hum
eso
inf
and
info
kno
ess
nal
ize
ortation
ation
 Eco
 Low
inc
5
ain
ce
lls,
ure

or
nce
e
Answered 2 days After Apr 21, 2023

Solution

Sanjukta answered on Apr 23 2023
37 Votes
International Business
The word CAGE is mainly an acronym for Geographical, Cultural, and Administrative as well economic distance. Furthermore, CAGE distance framework tends to enable companies for analysing markets within different countries. On the other hand, this author has introduced the readers to the CAGE distance framework which is mainly used for prioritizing and identifying the differences between countries that firms should address when developing the strategies of the cross-border (Ghemawat & Altman, 2016).
There are some of the major advantages of the CAGE Distance framework such as it is comprehensive in the categories, it forces consideration on a wide range of issues that can impact an individual, it enables discussion to take advantage of the differences along with it provides a crystal clear look at the partialities that prevails in terms of entering into the marketplace. The author have stated that with the help of this framework the important information are captured that one needs to consider when entering a new marketplace but it can be also applied for entering a different type of industry.
The CAGE framework can also be used to contrast...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here