Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Comparative income statements of Stu Corporation for the calendar years 2011, 2012, and 2013 are as follows (in thousands): ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1. Stu was a 75 percent-owned subsidiary of Pli...

1 answer below »
Comparative income statements of Stu Corporation for the calendar years 2011, 2012, and 2013 are as follows (in thousands):

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
1. Stu was a 75 percent-owned subsidiary of Pli Corporation throughout the 2011–2013 period. Pli’s separate income (excludes income from Stu) was $5,400,000, $5,100,000, and $6,000,000 in 2011, 2012, and 2013, respectively. Pli acquired its interest in Stu at its underlying book value, which was equal to fair value on July 1, 2010.
2. Pli sold inventory items to Stu during 2011 at a gross profit to Pli of $600,000. Half the merchandise remained in Stu’s inventory at December 31, 2011. Total sales by Pli to Stu in 2011 were $1,500,000. The remaining merchandise was sold by Stu in 2012.
3. Pli’s inventory at December 31, 2012, included items acquired from Stu on which Stu made a profit of $300,000. Total sales by Stu to Pli during 2012 were $1,200,000.
4. There were no unrealized profits in the December 31, 2013, inventories of either Stu or Pli.
5. Pli uses the equity method of accounting for its investment in Stu.
REQUIRED
1. Prepare a schedule showing Pli’s income from Stu for the years 2011, 2012, and 2013.
2. Compute Pli’s net income for the years 2011, 2012, and 2013.
3. Prepare a schedule of consolidated net income for Pli Corporation and Subsidiary for the years 2011, 2012, and 2013, beginning with the separate incomes of the two affiliates and including noncontrolling interest computations.

Answered Same Day Dec 24, 2021

Solution

Robert answered on Dec 24 2021
113 Votes
In the given case, PLI Corporation holds 75% stake in STU Corporation. Being the substantial shake in both the companies are held by PLI Corporation, at year end consolidated financial statement will be prepared.
If the goods are sold by the parent corporation at mark up, so for the perspective of consolidation the mark up from the inventories remaining at year ends needs to be excluded first. Like in this case (year 2011) PLI corporation sold the goods to STU corporation at mark up of $600,000 and at year end half of the inventory that has been sold by the parent company are lying in stock for STU corporation. So from the perspective of consolidation the mark up from the inventories remaining at year ends needs to be excluded i.e. $300,000.
Similar case happened in Year 2012 when STU Corporation made sales to PLI Corporation which had a mark up of $300,000. The same material lies in the inventory of PLI Corporation at year end.
Answer 1
    STU corporation
    2011
    2012
    2013
    Sales
     $ 1,20,00,000
    ...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers