Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

BUSINESS LAW – LAWS 1018 ASSIGNMENT - PART A DUE 29th March XXXXXXXXXX00pm (via learnonline site) PLEASE REFER TO THE COURSE OUTLINE FOR DETAILS ON THE ASSESSMENT PART A NOTE: WORD LIMIT : 600 WORDS...

1 answer below »
BUSINESS LAW – LAWS 1018
ASSIGNMENT - PART A
DUE 29th March XXXXXXXXXX00pm (via learnonline site)
PLEASE REFER TO THE COURSE OUTLINE FOR DETAILS ON THE ASSESSMENT PART A
    NOTE: WORD LIMIT : 600 WORDS
There is no leeway on the word count for this assessment piece…penalty applies immediately.
The word count does not include headings or references.
PENALTIES FOR EXCEEDING WORD LIMIT IS 10 MARKS PER 100 WORDS OVER THE WORD COUNT.
 
PLEASE ENSURE YOU USE THE TEMPLATE LINKED ON THE SUBJECT SITE – THIS INCLUDES A COVER HEET AND A MARKING SHEET
*******************************************************************
Ha
y, Liam and Zayn have formed a business partnership. They own and manage a winery in the Adelaide Hills called One Direction. Zayn makes the wine. Ha
y and Liam are responsible for running the business and the cellar door. They hold a meeting, and all decide to spend some money refu
ishing the cellar door with new tables, chairs and lighting. When they started the winery, they dealt with Niall who gave them a great deal on the original furniture at his business Best Restaurant Buys (BRB) and since then purchased additional lighting from him.
Both Ha
y and Zayn visit the shop, having all agreed on a maximum dollar amount to be spent on the refu
ishments. They choose a particular set of tables and chairs and order the required number. Following this purchase, Ha
y leaves town for his annual, month long holiday.
Meanwhile when Zayn calls into Best Restaurant Buys the following day, he notices some chairs were upholstered in leather instead of the vinyl which he and Ha
y had chosen. Even though they cost more than five times the chosen chairs, taking the cost well over the agreed amount, Zayn changes the order and purchases these for the cellar door, as he thinks they would give the cellar a much more ‘up-market’ look. He does not inform Liam and thinks he should not bother Ha
y on his holiday.
When Ha
y returns and he and Liam see the amount owing for the new furniture, they are furious with Zayn and claim that Zayn had no authority to change the order and will have to pay the extra amount himself. Liam adds that as he had nothing to do with the choice of chairs, he is not liable. With business being a bit slow, and with the other refu
ishment costs, the partnership funds are too low to pay the extra amount.
Zayn argues the furniture is for the partnership and, in any case, he now has no money. Zayn and his wife Gigi were in the process of separating and Zayn reveals that Gigi has taken all their money from their bank accounts. Best Restaurant Buys has threatened to sue all three if payment is not made immediately.
Using the Partnership Act 1891 (SA) and relevant cases, discuss the legal issues relevant to the partnership explaining who is liable for the debt.
Answered Same Day Mar 31, 2021

Solution

Ishika answered on Mar 31 2021
153 Votes
Issue no 1:
Can any one member make a business decision without anyone else’s authority?
Rule:
Partnership Act (SA) 1891 Section 5 - Power of partner to bind firm.
Queensland acknowledges in Section 5 of the Partnership Act 1891 that every partner is an agent and that other partners may work on behalf of another partner for business purposes. It became evident in this segment that partners have a right to purchase or to sell in the name of the company. Section 27 (PA) states that, unless otherwise specified, the parties shall be equally compensated by all interest and duties of the party subject to special a
angement including benefit and loss. All partners are also responsible for the debts owed to QDA in this case.
Application:
Under the law of the Partnership Act SA, any member of the company may act on behalf of the company. They have no jurisdiction until all parties know. Zisis claims, for instance, that its partner has no right to make a sale of the partnership's property, for example in Zisis v Knighton [2008], NSWCA 42, without his consent. Although it...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here