RESEARCHING SECTION 2: ANNOTATED REFERENCE LIST /40 % |
Clear Fail | Needs Work | Pass | Credit | Distinction | High Distinction |
Harvard UWS reference | Not in any known referencing format - Missing required bibliographic details OR
- No references included.
| All or most references are not in Harvard UWS style but: - All required bibliographic details are present.
- May or may not include view date and url/data base/DOI.
| All references are in Harvard UWS style but: - Some required bibliographic details are not present and/or
- They are poorly formatted.
| The Harvard UWS style is acceptable: - Most of the required bibliographic details are present and/or
- Not correctly formatted.
| The Harvard UWS style is very good: - All required bibliographic details are present; but
- It is not properly punctuated and/or
- May or may not include view date and url/data base/DOI.
- Correctly formatted.
| The Harvard UWS style is excellent: - Authors’ names are presented correctly
- Date presented correctly
- Titles are italicised
- All required bibliographic details are present
- May or may not include view date and url/data base/DOI.
- Properly punctuated and
- Correctly formatted.
|
/10 |
0-2.5 | 3.0-4.5 | 5.0-6.0 | 6.5-7.0 | 7.5-8.0 | XXXXXXXXXX |
Genre | Less than 3 genres are included. | All or most genres are included but are not correctly identified. | 3 genres are included and correctly identified. | 4-5 genres are included and correctly identified. | 6-7 genres are included and correctly identified. | All 8 required genres are included and correctly identified. |
/7 |
0-1.5 | 2.0-3.0 | 3.5-4.0 | 4.5 | 5.0-5.5 | 6.0-7.0 |
Summary | Less than 3 annotations clearly summarise the appropriate information. | 3-4 annotations clearly summarise the appropriate information. | 5 annotations clearly summarise the appropriate information. | 6 annotations clearly summarise the appropriate information. | 7 annotations clearly summarise the appropriate information. | All 8 annotations clearly summarise the appropriate information. |
/8 |
0-2.0 | 2.5-3.5 | 4.0-4.5 | 5.0-5.5 | 6.0-6.5 | 7.0-8.0 |
Use | Less than 3 annotations identify specific information and highlight how it could be used to address the assessment task. | 3-4 annotations identify specific information and highlight how it could be used to address the assessment task. | 5 annotations identify specific information and highlight how it could be used to address the assessment task. | 6 annotations identify specific information and highlight how it could be used to address the assessment task. | 7 annotations identify specific information and highlight how it could be used to address the assessment task. | All 8 annotations identify specific information and highlight how it could be used to address the assessment task. |
/10 |
0-2.5 | 3.0-4.5 | 5.0-6.0 | 6.5-7.0 | 7.5-8.0 | XXXXXXXXXX |
Expression, spelling, grammar & punctuation | There are major grammatical errors which make the essay difficult to comprehend. | - Does not use formal, objective and concise language and/or
- There are many spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors.
| - Sometimes uses formal, objective and concise language and/or
- There are some spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors.
| - Mostly uses formal, objective and concise language and/or
- There are a few spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors.
| - Always uses formal, objective and concise language or
- There are minor spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors.
| - Always uses formal, objective and concise language and
- There are no spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors.
|
/5 |
0-1.0 | 1.5-2.0 | 2.5-3.0 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 4.5-5.0 |