SM - Assessment 1_Trade Me
Analysis
y Diogo Cris De Lara
Submission date: 23-Jun XXXXXXXXXX:11PM (UTC+1200)
Submission ID: XXXXXXXXXX
File name: 60256_Diogo_Cris_De_Lara_SM_-_Assessment_1_Trade_Me_Analysis_540315_ XXXXXXXXXXpdf
Word count: 3964
Character count: 23192
7%
SIMILARITY INDEX
1%
INTERNET SOURCES
0%
PUBLICATIONS
6%
STUDENT PAPERS
1 1%
2 1%
3 1%
4 1%
5 1%
6 1%
7 <1%
8 <1%
9
SM - Assessment 1_Trade Me Analysis
ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
Submitted to Auckland Institute of Studies
Student Pape
Submitted to MFH International Institute
Student Pape
Submitted to University of Sydney
Student Pape
Submitted to Em
y Riddle Aeronautical
University
Student Pape
Submitted to Victoria University of Wellington
Student Pape
Submitted to Anglia Ruskin University
Student Pape
Submitted to University of Auckland
Student Pape
Submitted to Massey University
Student Pape
Submitted to City University of Hong Kong
1%
10 <1%
11 <1%
12 <1%
13 <1%
14 <1%
Exclude quotes Of f
Exclude bibliography Of f
Exclude matches Of f
Student Pape
Submitted to Bryan College
Student Pape
Submitted to Turun yliopisto
Student Pape
www.oecd.org
Internet Source
Enrico Bonetti. "The effectiveness of meta‐
ands in the typical product industry:
mozzarella cheese", British Food Journal, 2004
Publicat ion
Submitted to British School of Commerce -
Colombo
Student Pape
SM - Assessment 1_Trade Me Analysis
by Diogo Cris De Lara
SM - Assessment 1_Trade Me Analysis
ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
Auckland International Campus CX770020 Strategic Management
Page | 6
ASSESSMENT 1: PART B INSTRUCTIONS (INDIVIDUAL)
Write an individual report that demonstrates critical reflection around the following:
Stakeholders and wider issues
1. Consider the expectations of stakeholders by discussing a wide range of relevant issues,
such as environmental sustainability, ethics, leadership, culture, the global environment,
and making workplaces fit for humans.
2. How could responding to these expectations and issues, to create competitive advantage
for a business?
Report Structure
Your report could have the following structure:
Title Page (includes title of the proposal, name of the person the report is for, date
submitted)
Table of Contents
Introduction
Stakeholders and wider issue
o Stakeholders expectation and wider issues
o Responding to create competitive advantage
Conclusion
Note that you must use appropriate referencing (in text and a reference list). Referencing the
source of concepts, tools and techniques is an important aspect to enhance the credibility of
your evaluation.
Word Count
The word count EXCLUDES your reference list and APPENDIX.
Plagiarism
Plagiarism is a form of academic dishonesty. Cases of dishonesty are regarded as serious by
Otago Polytechnic. See the Course Outline and OPAIC policies about this.
MINIMUM ACHIEVEMENT REQUIREMENT
You must achieve a combined minimum of 40% for the Individual Reports (Assessment 1: Part
and Assessment 2) For a mark below 40% the lecturer will reduce the marks for all other
assessments (Assessment 1: Part a, and Assessment 3) to the same level, unless compelling
evidence exists of the student’s contribution to these assessments. For a mark between 40%
and 50% the lecturer may also reduce the marks for all other assessments (Assessment 1:Part
a, and Assessment 3) to the same level.
The lecturer may make a determination about this adjustment based on the individual’s
contribution to group work in class, attendance and other factors indicating individual effort and
contribution. The lecturer could also assign additional work, or a resubmission of all or selected
parts of the assignment. However, such determination will be the exception, and is at the
discretion of the lecturer.
Auckland International Campus CX770020 Strategic Management
Page | 7
SUBMISSION
The reports for Assessment 1: part b, and Assessment 2 will be submitted as one combined
eport on moodle. This is done to simplify the submission process of these individual reports for
students.
MARKING RUBRIC – INDIVIDUAL REPORT
P
e
f
e
c
t
E
x
c
e
lle
n
t
V
e
y
G
o
o
d
G
o
o
d
A
o
v
e
a
v
e
a
g
e
A
v
e
a
g
e
B
e
lo
w
a
v
e
a
g
e
In
a
d
e
q
u
a
te
P
o
o
V
e
y
p
o
o
% XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX
Percentages are indicative
Introduction:
Purpose of the report,
key focus of this
eport,
ief
description of the
organisation.
5
Introduction judged by how well it prepares the reader for the content of
the report.
Stakeholders and wider issues
1- Stakeholders and
wider issues
analysis
50
A range of relevant stakeholders and issues are discussed. Indicative
issues include environmental sustainability, ethics, leadership, culture,
the global environment, and making workplaces fit for humans.
2- Responding to
create competitive
advantage
40
An analysis is done of how responding to these expectations and issue
create competitive advantage for a business?
Presentation:
Presentation supports
understanding of the
eport.
5
How well does the presentation of the report support understanding of
the report by a reader (e.g. a busy manager or CEO).
Indicative aspects to consider could include: physical appearance,
length, writing style, grammar, spelling and punctuation, referencing,
use of figures, headings and summaries, use of appendices.
Strategic Management Assessment 2 - Critical Review - Term 3 2018
Auckland International Campus
Bachelor of Applied Management
Graduate Diploma in Applied Management
CX770020 Strategic Management
Assessment 2
Individual Critical Review and Planning
Study Block 3: 2018
Due: Week 6, Day 1
Weighting: 15%
Type: Individual assessment
Report Length: 1,000 – 2,000 words
Submit: Electronically (no hard copy) to the Moodle site for this paper.
Important note:
You must achieve a combined minimum of 40% for the Individual Reports (Assessment 1: Part
and Assessment 2). In other words 40% minimum across Assessment 1b and Assessment 2.
Auckland International Campus CX770020 Strategic Management
Page | 2
OBJECTIVES
This assessment is designed to allow you to demonstrate your understanding of the concepts,
tools, and techniques fundamental to strategic management. You will critically consider how the
concepts, tools, techniques and the overall approach to Strategic Management could be
adjusted to take into account stakeholder’s needs and related issues.
LEARNING OUTCOMES
1. Think critically regarding the application of relevant concepts, tools, and techniques of
strategy
INSTRUCTIONS – ALL ASSESSMENTS
See in Report 1 instructions.
ASSESSMENT 2 INSTRUCTIONS (INDIVIDUAL)
You are expected to write an individual report that demonstrates critical reflection around the
following:
You are required to:
1. Reflect on the analysis done in Assessment 1. Did this adequately consider the needs
of stakeholder and wider issues? What could make it more responsive to these needs
and issues? Refer to your analysis done on 1a above.
2. Given your stakeholder analysis, state (1) What the key determinants of competitive
advantage would be, and (2) How you would formulate a strategy in Report 3, for
instance its structure, and what tools, concepts, approaches etc. could be used in this
formulation.
Report Structure
Your report could have the following structure:
Title Page (includes title of the proposal, name of the person the report is for, date
submitted)
Table of Contents
Introduction
Reflecting and planning
o Report 1 reflection
Needs of stakeholders and wider issues
Being more responsive to these needs and issues
o Report 3 reflective planning – stakeholder focused
Key determinants of competitive advantage
Strategy to improve competitive advantage
Conclusion
Note that you must use appropriate referencing (in text and a reference list). Referencing the
source of concepts, tools and techniques is an important aspect to enhance the credibility of
your evaluation.
Auckland International Campus CX770020 Strategic Management
Page | 3
Word Count
The word count EXCLUDES your reference list and APPENDIX.
Plagiarism
Plagiarism is a form of academic dishonesty. Cases of dishonesty are regarded as serious by
Otago Polytechnic. See the Course Outline and OPAIC policies about this.
MINIMUM ACHIEVEMENT REQUIREMENT
You must achieve a combined minimum of 40% for the Individual Reports (Assessment 1: Part
and Assessment 2). For a mark below 40% the lecturer will reduce the marks for all other
assessments (Assessment 1: Part a, and Assessment 3) to the same level, unless compelling
evidence exists of the student’s contribution to these assessments. For a mark between 40%
and 50% the lecturer may also reduce the marks for all other assessments (Assessment 1:Part
a, and Assessment 3) to the same level.
The lecturer may make a determination about this adjustment based on the individual’s
contribution to group work in class, attendance and other factors indicating individual effort and
contribution. The lecturer could also assign additional work, or a resubmission of all or selected
parts of the assignment. However, such determination will be the exception, and is at the
discretion of the lecturer.
See in the Course Outline how these evaluations will be done by the lecturer (see heading
“DETERMINING WHETHER A STUDENT CONTRIBUTED TO GROUP WORK, AND
WHETHER THEIR INDIVIDUAL MARKS SHOULD BE ADJUSTED”). The peer reviews will also
affect this determination. Note that the preference is always to make no changes, and this
intervention is to ensure that any freeloading or free rider behaviour is prevented, or that
exceptional performance is rewarded more. It is not intended to make small changes based on
minimal differences between group members.
SUBMISSION
The reports for Assessment 1: part b, and Assessment 2 will be submitted as one combined
eport on moodle. This is done to simplify the submission process of these individual reports for
students.
Auckland International Campus CX770020 Strategic Management
Page | 4
MARKING RUBRIC – INDIVIDUAL REPORT
P
e
f
e
c
t
E
x
c
e
lle
n
t
V
e
y
G
o
o
d
G
o
o
d
A
o
v
e
a
v
e
a
g
e
A
v
e
a
g
e