Criteria | High Distinction | Distinction | Credit | Pass |
Explanation and critical evaluation of the influence of Australian and international professional standards, public expectations and regulatory bodies on audit and assurance services. (7 marks) | Provides a comprehensive synthesis and critical evaluation of the APRA findings and their impact on audit risk. | Provides an advanced synthesis and critical evaluation of the APRA findings and their impact on audit risk. | Provides a competent synthesis and critical evaluation of the APRA findings and their impact on audit risk. | Provides a simple listing of the APRA recommendations with some recognition of the impact on audit risk. |
Use of critical and reflective judgment in ethical practice in the application of the ethical decisionguide (3 marks). | Complex and detailed application of the ethical decision guide demonstrating strong critical and reflective thinking the use of the guide. | Logical application of the ethical decision guide demonstrating coherent critical and reflective thinking in the use of the guide. | Substantial application of the ethical decision guide demonstrating criticalor reflective thinking in the useof the guide. . | Ethical decision guide applied demonstratingbasic thinking inthe use of the guide. |
Critical explanation of the influence of public expectations and regulatory bodies on audit and assurance services (3 marks) | Provides a comprehensive synthesis and critical evaluation of the role that incorporation and statutory cap on auditors' liability have on the limitation of auditors' liability. | Provides an advanced synthesis and critical evaluation of the role that incorporation and statutory cap on auditors' liability have on the limitation of auditors' liability. | Provides a competent synthesis and critical evaluation of the role that incorporation and statutory cap on auditors' liability have on the limitation of auditors' liability. | Provides a basic critical evaluation of the role that incorporation and statutory cap on auditors' liability have on the limitation of auditors' liability. |
These last two criteria relate to the whole of the case study. Professional communication including the use of a report structure for Question 1. (Note: you are required to space between paragraphs; use Arial 10pt or TNR 12 pt; use 1.5 or double line spacing) (1 mark). | Question 1 is in a report format and contains distinct understandable statements with no errors. There is a sophisticated use of language. Extremely well organised. Content is structured in a manner that facilitates the reader’s understanding. | Question 1 is in a report format and contains distinct understandable statements with minimal errors. Answer is well organised. Content is structured in a manner that facilitates the reader’s understanding.
| Question 1 is in a report format. There are minor spelling, grammar and punctuation errors. Work shows evidence of proofreading. Well-structured with one main idea or argument provided per paragraph. | Some spelling, grammar and punctuation errors found but the work is readable and structured. Some attempt at a business report format. Work may include too many ideas in one paragraph. |
Appropriate resources and correct referencing. (1 mark) | Usedthree or more sources. All work has been referenced correctly as per APA (6th edn) requirements. | Used two or more sources. All work has been referenced correctly as per APA (6th edn) requirements. | Used one or more sources. All work has been referenced within the body of the answer and in the reference list, with some omissions or errors in terms. | No additional sources other than the text used. Others’ work is not always acknowledged and there are several errors or items of non-compliance with the APA (6th edn). |