Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Instructions: For the first milestone of your final project, you will submit a managing operations case study analysis that uses the tools and techniques that operations managers use. This case study...

1 answer below »
Instructions:
For the first milestone of your final project, you will submit a managing operations case study analysis that uses the tools and techniques that operations managers use. This case study analysis will be incorporated into the final summative analysis. This milestone is due in Module Two.
Refer to the case study (located in the Reading and Resources area of Module One), your own independent research, and the course materials to complete this milestone. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Generating Value
1. Evaluate how the company in the case study uses operations management functions to provide products and generate value for its customers.
Support your claims with examples from the case study or outside sources.
2. Assess how this company achieves a competitive advantage using operations management. Provide examples found in the case study or outside
sources to support your reasoning.
3. Compare and contrast service operations and manufacturing operations at the company in the case study. How are they the same? How do they
differ? How does each of these operations provide value for their customers?
II. Theories and Techniques
1. Compare and contrast the critical path method (CPM) and the program evaluation and review technique (PERT). What types of projects at this
company would favor PERT over CPM? Why? What types of projects at this company would favor CPM over PERT? Why?
2. Explain the steps used to develop a forecasting system. How would these steps be specifically utilized by this company? What do you predict
would be the result of implementing a forecasting system for the top-selling product line at this company?
3. List the major categories of supply chain risk and associated risk reduction tactics. How could the company mitigate exposure to supply chain
disruptions caused by natural disasters? For example, consider the 2011 earthquake and tsunami that devastated parts of Japan.
Case study:
https:
www.abacademies.org/articles/jiacsvol17no12011.pdf
PAGE XXXXXXXXXX

Microsoft Word - JIACS Vol 17 No 1 2011


Volume 17, Number 1 Printed ISSN: XXXXXXXXXX
PDF ISSN: XXXXXXXXXX





JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL
ACADEMY FOR CASE STUDIES




Editors

Inge Nickerson, Ba
y University

Charles Rarick, Purdue University, Calumet










The Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies is owned and
published by the DreamCatchers Group, LLC. Editorial content is under the
control of the Allied Academies, Inc., a non-profit association of scholars, whose
purpose is to support and encourage research and the sharing and exchange of
ideas and insights throughout the world.

Page ii
Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies, Volume 17, Number 1, 2011




Authors execute a publication permission agreement and assume all liabilities.
Neither the DreamCatchers Group or Allied Academies is responsible for the
content of the individual manuscripts. Any omissions or e
ors are the sole
esponsibility of the authors. The Editorial Board is responsible for the selection
of manuscripts for publication from among those submitted for consideration.
The Publishers accept final manuscripts in digital form and make adjustments
solely for the purposes of pagination and organization.














The Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies is owned and
published by the DreamCatchers Group, LLC, PO Box 1708, Arden, NC 28704,
USA. Those interested in communicating with the Journal, should contact the
Executive Director of the Allied Academies at [email protected].





Copyright 2011 by the DreamCatchers Group, LLC, Arden NC, USA

Page iii

Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies, Volume 17, Number 1, 2011
EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS

Irfan Ahmed
Sam Houston State University
Huntsville, Texas
Devi Akella
Albany State University
Albany, Georgia
Charlotte Allen
Stephen F. Austin State University
Nacogdoches, Texas
Thomas T. Amlie
SUNY Institute of Technology
Utica, New York
Ismet Anitsal
Tennessee Tech University
Cookeville, Tennessee
Kavous Ardalan
Marist College
Poughkeepsie, New York
Joe Ballenger
Stephen F. Austin State University
Nacogdoches, Texas
Lisa Berardino
SUNY Institute of Technology
Utica, New York
Thomas Bertsch
James Madison University
Ha
isonburg, Virginia
Steve Betts
William Paterson University
Wayne, New Jersey
Narendra Bhandari
Pace University
North Brunswick, New Jersey
Ba
ara Bieber-Hamby
Stephen F. Austin State University
Nacogdoches, Texas
W. Blaker Bolling
Marshall University
Huntington, West Virginia
Lisa N. Bostick
The University of Tampa
Tampa, Florida
Michael W. Boyd
Western Carolina University
Cullowhee, North Carolina
Thomas M. Box
Pittsburg State University
Pittsburg, Kansas
William Brent
Howard University
Washington, DC
Michael Broihahn
Ba
y University
Miami Shores, Florida
Gary Brunswick
Northern Michigan University
Marquette, Michigan
Carol Bruton
California State University San Marcos
Poway, California
Gene Calvasina
Southern University
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Russell Casey
Penn State University Worthington Scranton
Dunmore, Pennsylvania
Yung Yen Chen
Nova Southeastern University
Davie, Florida
Wil Clouse
Vande
ilt University
Nashville, Tennessee
Clarence Coleman
Winthrop University
Rock Hill, South Carolina
Michael H. Deis
Clayton College & State University
Mo
ow, Georgia
Carol Docan
CSU, Northridge
Northridge, California
Scott Droege
Mississippi State University-Meridian Campus
Meridian, Mississippi
Page iv
Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies, Volume 17, Number 1, 2011
EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS

Martine Duchatelet
Purdue University Calumet
Hammond, Indiana
Steve Edison
University of Arkansas at Little Rock
Little Rock, Arkansas
Andrew A. Ehlert
Mississippi University for Women
Columbus, Mississippi
Henry Elrod
University of the Incarnate Word
San Antonio, Texas
Mike Evans
Winthrop University
Rock Hill, South Carolina
Werner Fees
Georg-Simon-Ohm-Fachhochschule Nuernberg
Nuernberg, Germany
Troy Festervand
Middle Tennessee State University
Murfreesboro, Tennessee
Art Fischer
Pittsburg State University
Pittsburg, Kansas
Ba
ara Fuller
Winthrop University
Rock Hill, South Carolina
Ramaswamy Ganesan
BITS-Pilani Goa Campus
Goa, India
Joseph J. Geiger
University of Idaho
Moscow, Idaho
Issam Ghazzawi
University of La Verne
La Verne, California
Michael Grayson
Jackson State University
Jackson, Mississippi
Richard Gregory
University of South Carolina Spartanburg
Spartanburg, South Carolina
Robert D. Gul
o
Athens State University
Athens, Alabama
Allan Hall
SUNY Institute of Technology
Utica, New York
Karen Hamilton
Appalachian State University
Boone, North Carolina
Heikki Heino
Governors State University
University Park, Illinois
Te
ance Jalbert
University of Hawaii at Hilo
Hilo, Hawaii
Marianne L. James
California State University, Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California
Marlene Kahla
Stephen F. Austin State University
Nacogdoches, Texas
Joseph Kavanaugh
Sam Houston State University
Spring, Texas
William J. Kehoe
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia
Wasif M. Khan
Lahore University of Management Sciences
Lahore, PU, Pakistan
Marla Kraut
University of Idaho
Moscow, Idaho
S. Krishnamoorthy
Amrita Institute of Management
Tamil Nadu, India
Dave Kunz
Southeast Missouri State University
Cape Girardeau, Missouri
John Lawrence
University of Idaho
Moscow, Idaho
Jonathan Lee
University of Windsor
Windsor, Ontario, Canada
John Lewis
Stephen F. Austin State University
Nacogdoches, Texas
Page v

Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies, Volume 17, Number 1, 2011
EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS

Rod Lievano
University of Minnesota Duluth
Duluth, Minnesota
Steve Loy
Eastern Kentucky University
Richmond, Kentucky
Anne Macy
West Texas A&M University
Canyon, Texas
Edwin Lee Makamson
Hampton University
Hampton, Virginia
Jeff Mankin
Lipscomb University
Nashville, Tennessee
Paul Marshall
Widener University
Chester, Pennsylvania
James R. Maxwell
State University of New York College at Buffalo
Buffalo, New York
Steve McGuire
California State University, Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California
Michael McLain
Hampton University
Elizabeth City, North Carolina
Todd Mick
Missouri Western State University
St. Joseph, Missouri
Kenneth K. Mitchell
Shaw University
Raleigh, North Carolina
Mohsen Moda
es
Humboldt State University
Arcata, California
William B. Morgan
Felician College
Jackson, New Jersey
Inge Nickerson
Ba
y University
Miami Shores, Florida
Inder Nijhawan
Fayetteville State University
Fayetteville, North Carolina
Adebisi Olumide
Lagos State University
Lagos, Nigeria
Joseph Ormsby
Stephen F. Austin State University
Nacogdoches, Texas
D. J. Parker
University of Washington Tocama
Tacoma, Washington
Karen Paul
Florida International University
Miami, Florida
Steven K. Paulson
University of North Florida
Jacksonville, Florida
Te
y Pearson
West Texas A&M University
Canyon, Texas
Rashmi Prasad
University of Alaska Anchorage
Anchorage, Alaska
Sanjay Rajagopal
Western Carolina University
Cullowhee, North Carolina
Charles Rarick
Purdue University Calumet
Hammond, Indiana
She
y Robinson
Penn State University
New Albany, Pennsylvania
Ida Robinson-Backmon
University of Baltimore
Baltimore, Maryland
Durga Prasad Samontaray
King Saud University
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Joesph C. Santora
Essex County College
Newark, New Jersey
Sujata Satapathy
Indian Institute of Technology
New Delhi, India
Bob Schwab
Andrews University
Be
ien Springs, Michigan
Page vi
Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies, Volume 17, Number 1, 2011
EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS

Elton Scifres
Stephen F. Austin State University
Nacogdoches, Texas
He
ert Sherman
Southampton College
Southampton, New York
Linda Shonesy
Athens
Answered Same Day Nov 07, 2021

Solution

Jose answered on Nov 08 2021
133 Votes
Management
Case Study
Student Name
Course Code
Date
I. Generating Value
1. Evaluate how the company in the case study uses operations management functions to provide products and generate value for its customers. Support your claims with examples from the case study or outside sources.
We know the fact that for attaining the competitive advantage the companies have to give more importance to the operation management functions and activities. While analyzing the case we can understand that the company BYD successfully used the operations management functions such as quality management and material management (Yan et al 2021). BYD has tapped into a cost innovation strategy by reducing manufacturing costs through reverse engineering the expensive Japanese battery models and substituting the expensive raw materials with cheaper substitutes. Customers are interested to buy the quality products, from the case it is clear that that company used quality management strategies and tactics for generating the value for the customers and for increasing the sales. From the case study we can understand that the company faced tough competition from the national and international automobile companies, but they used the operation management strategy for managing the competition.
2. Assess how this company achieves a competitive advantage using operations management. Provide examples found in the case study or outside sources to support your reasoning.
For attaining the competitive advantage, we have to use different strategies and methods. While analyzing the case study we can understand that BYD is moving much faster and much more aggressively in the direction of introducing an all-electric car. The company also worked with the suppliers in for providing innovative products and services to the customers (Wolniak 2020). For example, the company noticed that more and more of her customers are looking for the quality cars at less price. From the case study we can understand that BYD worked with suppliers to introduce electric car at less cost. The company also focused on the providing best quality customer service and it also helped the company for attaining the competitive advantage. GM, Ford, Toyota, Daimler Benz, Volkswagen are the major competitors of the company and the company focused on cost...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here