Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Andrew, Brian, Colin, Diana and Elizabeth were the directors of Gemsales Pty Ltd, a company engaged in the business of importing and supplying jewellery as wholesalers to the local market. The company...

1 answer below »

Andrew, Brian, Colin, Diana and Elizabeth were the directors of Gemsales Pty Ltd, a company engaged in the business of importing and supplying jewellery as wholesalers to the local market.
The company decided that as the market was becoming more competitive it needed to expand its business as it felt with increased volumes of sales it would be able to lower its prices and be more competitive. In order to do so it obtained a $4 million dollar loan from the Friendly Bank Ltd. $3 million was used to buy more stock and $1 million was used to buy a large new warehouse and showrooms from Traders Pty Ltd.
Colin was not at the meeting that had made these decisions as he was in hospital recovering from a serious accident. Elizabeth, as was her usual custom, had not attended the meeting but signed the requisite documentation agreeing to the expansion of the business and the getting of the loan. Diana who attended, said she did not know if she agreed and abstained from voting. Andrew and Brian both voted to go ahead with the expansion and the getting of the loan.
At about this time Brian has established contact with Victor, who was setting up a new business as a retailer of jewellery. Victor was looking for reliable suppliers, but said he would not deal with Gemsales Pty Ltd as he did not like Andrew, the Managing Director. Not wishing to miss out on such a lucrative business opportunity, Brian arranged to set up his own business as a jewellery wholesaler and a contract was entered into between Victor and Brian for the supply of jewellery.
Six months later, Brian resigned as a director. At the same time it was clear the company had over-extended itself and was insolvent and could not pay the interest on its loans.
It also became clear that Brian was a major shareholder in Traders Pty Ltd and the other directors were unaware of this at the time of the purchase of the warehouse and showrooms. Furthermore, Brian had been approaching other established customers of Gemsales Pty Ltd and had secured orders for his own business.
Advise as to the liability of ALL the parties both under common law and the Corporations Law. In your answer you should address all the issues relating to each of the directors and their duties to the corporation.

Answered Same Day Dec 23, 2021

Solution

Robert answered on Dec 23 2021
128 Votes
The directors have a liability of paying interest on loans taken from Friendly Bank Ltd. The courts
need to decide if the company’s directors were involved in insolvent trading and
eached s588G.
this section deals with responsibility of director who takes up debt when a company is insolvent or
will become insolvent by incu
ing the debt. For checking what company insolvency refers to, the
section that should be refe
ed to is s95 A. Solvency is defined as company’s ability to repay debt as
due, given by s95A(1). The section s95 A(2) calls a company not being solvent, suffering from
insolvency. As the situation describes, there is a high likelihood that company is going to be declared
insolvent.
Once this happens, the courts will uncover the corporate veil and will go after the company’s
directors with section s588G, which charges the directors with the duty of preventing insolvent
trading.
After the prima facie case has been established against directors for conducting insolvent trading,
the following defences can be considered under section s588H:
- S588H (4) states that a director can be relieved if he is proven to be ill when the debt was
incu
ed. Colin, was in hospital, recovering from a serious accident when the episode took
place. So he can file a defence under these circumstances with proper evidence in place.
- Another defence available to the directors is under S588H (5) which states that a director
might not be held liable if he/she makes a reasonable effort to avoid the incu
ence of debt.
Diana was not fully convinced with the step and hence decided not to proceed with voting in
this case. If she had...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here