MGMT 4037 (Spring/Summer 2023)
Project Management Case Studies
Matt Simioni
Assignment #1 – Tristar Hotels (10%)
Assignment Questions:
1. In your own words describe the likely project scope, purpose and expected results? (3 marks)
2. What were the main drivers for change? (3 marks)
3. How did/will the Tristar Leadership and operations lead the project to delivery? (4 marks)
Microsoft Word - 9B20D023.docx
9B20D023
TRISTAR HOTEL GROUP: CUSTOMER SATISFACTION AND
TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION
Thomas A. Maier and Ken Edwards wrote this case solely to provide material for class discussion. The authors do not intend to
illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a managerial situation. The authors may have disguised certain names and other
identifying information to protect confidentiality.
This publication may not be transmitted, photocopied, digitized, or otherwise reproduced in any form or by any means without the
permission of the copyright holder. Reproduction of this material is not covered under authorization by any reproduction rights
organization. To order copies or request permission to reproduce materials, contact Ivey Publishing, Ivey Business School, Western
University, London, Ontario, Canada, N6G 0N1; (t XXXXXXXXXX; (e) XXXXXXXXXX; www.iveycases.com. Our goal is to publish
materials of the highest quality; submit any e
ata to XXXXXXXXXX. i1v2e5y5pubs
Copyright © 2020, Ivey Business School Foundation Version: XXXXXXXXXX
Tristar Hotel Group (Tristar), a privately owned company that operated in the hotel sector, owned and
managed multiple limited-service hotels throughout the United States. In August 2017, the US hotel industry
was facing rising labour costs, increasing workforce shortages, and pressure on profits associated with
changing travel and tourism market demand patterns. In light of those challenges, the founder and chief
executive officer (CEO) of Tristar, Ken Edwards, had to make important decisions concerning the adoption
of technology as a means of improving performance across the company’s expansive hotel portfolio.
Edwards felt that the early adoption of technology provided Tristar with a first-mover advantage over its
competitors. He had to consider how introducing robots into Tristar’s hotels would affect the workforce
and the delivery of customer service. More specifically, he needed to evaluate the cost–benefit analysis
egarding the adoption of automated robots in relation to the room service delivery process.
Edwards felt that the risk of introducing robots into the hotel environment could pay off in the long term.
Tristar had run a pilot project in 2017 at their Silicon Valley-Gilroy, California, managed Hilton property.
Edwards had learned that ARCHIE the robot was able to deliver upward of 200 orders per month within
the hotel at a lease cost of US$1,9001 per month (see Exhibit 1). On the basis of that information, Edwards
wondered whether Tristar should incorporate ARCHIE into the customer service experience. Did ARCHIE
epresent a favourable value proposition as a room service delivery robot?
TRISTAR’S BACKGROUND
Tristar was founded in 1996. After graduating from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV), Edwards
pursued his dream of forming his own hotel company. He started work as an assistant food and beverage
manager at the Holiday Inn hotel located at St. Louis Lambert International Airport. At the time, the hotel
was the largest in the Holiday Inn portfolio, with 428 rooms, two restaurants, and two lounges. During a
one-on-one interview session with Edwards, the general manager asked what he wanted to be doing in ten
years’ time. Edwards knew his goal and replied, “I want to own my own hotels one day!” Edwards
envisioned an organization focused on high-quality service, with the hotels characterized by well-appointed
1 All cu
ency amounts are in US$ unless otherwise specified.
A
ut
ho
iz
ed
fo
us
e
on
ly
y
R
ic
ha
d
B
at
ch
el
o
f
om
1
1
1
20
22
u
nt
il
9
11
2
02
2.
U
se
o
ut
si
de
th
es
e
pa
a
m
et
e
s
is
a
c
op
y
ig
ht
v
io
la
tio
n.
Page 2 9B20D023
physical attributes, technological innovation, and solid financial performance. Edwards proceeded to gain
experience working in several hotels, thereby acquiring first-hand knowledge of hotel operations and
management. The first hotel managed by Tristar was located in Orlando, Florida, and Edwards joined the
company following the acquisition of Tristar’s first hotel in 2000. Thereafter, Edwards and his management
team began managing and acquiring a wide variety of limited-service
anded hotels. He was recognized
for his exceptional managerial competencies and risk-taking entrepreneurial spirit, culminating in his
appointment to the board of directors of the International Hotel Group.
Hotels came in many shapes and forms. For example, hotel classifications could range from economy to
midscale to luxury positioned products.2 The costs associated with constructing hotels ranged from
$200,000 to $500,000 per key. The costs per key were calculated on the basis of the total number of rooms
under construction, including the (1) land acquisition, (2) building envelope, (3) furniture, fixtures, and
equipment, and (4) technology systems. For a 100-room hotel, the construction costs could range from $20
million to $50 million. According to Edwards, the hotel business was highly volatile due to the capital
investment needed to build a hotel. He was intimidated by the fluctuations in the economy, prevailing
market conditions, and increased competition. As a manager, he needed to constantly focus not just on the
hotel construction costs, but also on the operating margins and returns on investment capital.
As he developed his company, Edwards retained several managerial competencies as well as an underlying
focus on technological experimentation, which was at the forefront of Tristar’s value proposition. For
Edwards, exploring technology and linking innovation with the customer experience represented critical
elements of his company’s success. His adoption of prospective technology was a core competency of his
ustling hotel company. Unlike competitors, as technological advancements in artificial intelligence and
augmented reality continued to improve the customer service capabilities within the hotel sector, innovative
owners such as Edwards often chose to explore the capabilities of technology as a means of improving
operational efficiencies and “wowing” customers with unique service experiences.
Tristar grew to operate over 70 hotels across more than 16 states in the United States. In 2017, Tristar
oasted more than 17
anded hotel flags. Over the course of his career, Edwards had transformed the
hospitality sector, setting in motion several critical aspects of hotel ownership: (1) educating the workforce,
(2) taking risks, and (3) em
acing technology. As Edwards acknowledged, “I always knew I would be
successful; never did it occur to me that the risk could be greater than the reward.”
HOTEL SERVICE SYSTEM DESIGN
Edwards understood the impact of service quality and customer satisfaction on the financial sustainability
of his hotel properties, especially in the ever-evolving and expanding US hotel industry. Customer loyalty
programming was a key consideration, with major hotel
ands promising and often developing service
value and rewards for customer loyalty. Edwards knew all too well that the willingness of hotel customers
to recommend a
and to others was heavily dependent on customer satisfaction. He understood that
customer satisfaction and loyalty were highly valued by leisure travellers and business executives who
desired a comfortable, pleasant, and affordable hotel stay.
2 According to Smith Travel Research, “class” is defined as follows: “A categorization of chain-affiliated and independent
hotels. The class for a chain-affiliated hotel is the same as its Chain Scale. An independent hotel is assigned a class based
on its ADR, relative to that of the chain hotels in their geographic proximity. The class segments are: Luxury, Upper Upscale,
Upscale, Upper Midscale, Midscale and Economy.” “Glossary,” Smith Travel Research, accessed January 30, 2020,
https:
str.com/data-insights
esources/glossary/c.
A
ut
ho
iz
ed
fo
us
e
on
ly
y
R
ic
ha
d
B
at
ch
el
o
f
om
1
1
1
20
22
u
nt
il
9
11
2
02
2.
U
se
o
ut
si
de
th
es
e
pa
a
m
et
e
s
is
a
c
op
y
ig
ht
v
io
la
tio
n.
Page 3 9B20D023
In the hotel industry, both the front- and back-of-house operational elements were planned and
synchronized to generate customer satisfaction. Typically, the back-of-house processes were designed to
support front-facing customer interactions. Conversely, the front-of-house customer interactions were
designed to respond to customer needs by creating seamless a
ival, in-stay, and departure experiences.
The typical organizational structure of a hotel reflected a top-down hierarchy designed to ensure
coordinated decision-making protocols and standardized operating procedures. The Tristar operating
structure was based on the division of work in three main areas: (1) the rooms department, (2) the food and
everage department, and (3) the kitchen department. The organizational structure was designed to execute
the daily service requirements associated with hotel-driven customer experiences (see Exhibit 2).
Edwards felt that his organizational structure was adequate; however, customers’ expectations with regard
to service were growing and the integration of technology was rapidly evolving. The value proposition for
hotel operators was based on personalized service and customer satisfaction, and Edwards recognized the
need to experiment with technology in order to keep pace with the explosion of data and its relationship
with consumer activities on social media. He knew that he had to address the challenges stemming from a
tightening labour market that was making it increasingly difficult to staff his hotels.
The value proposition for Tristar’s guests was based on seamless customer service and value for the price
they paid for their hotel experience. The benefits associated with a solid price–value relationship, including
(1) accruing loyalty reward points, (2) quick and efficient a
ival and check-in, (3) integrating mobile device
technology for in-room services, and (4) enhancing customer experiences in various realms, provided
differentiation from Tristar’s competitors.3
For Tristar, the price–value relationship was benchmarked against its competitors’ customer satisfaction
scores and market share data using analytics such as that provided by Smith Travel Research (STR). STR’s
key performance indicators included (1) the occupancy percentage, (2) the average daily room rate, and (3)
the revenue per available room indexes, which pitted local hotel competitors against one another to
determine their share of the market hotel room demand.4 Edwards also knew that a service blueprinting tool
depicting front- and back-of-house employee actions would play an important role in the design of more
technologically engaging customer experiences (see Exhibit 3).
Edwards was particularly intrigued by the notion of introducing robots into the service sequence at Tristar’s
Silicon Valley-Gilroy, California, managed Hilton property. In a typical hotel service system design,
employee and customer activities were delineated into front- and back-of-house activities, which were
divided into (1) physical evidence and those things customers saw; (2) customer actions, which represented
activities customers performed during the room service ordering process; (3) onstage contact, which
described what kitchen- and restaurant-based guest-facing employees did; and (4) backstage contact, which
described what employees did behind the scenes to prepare and maintain the delivery robot (see Exhibit 3).
ROBOTIC AUTOMATION
Edwards had studied emerging technological trends in the hotel sector and beyond, and he realized that
automation, artificial intelligence, and robotic adoption in service delivery programming were gaining
3 B. Joseph Pine II and James H. Gilmore, “Welcome to the Experience Economy,” Harvard Business Review, July–August
1998. Available from Ivey Publishing, product no. 8147BC.
4 See the definitions of “occupancy,” “average daily rate,” and “revenue per available room” provided by Smith Travel
Research. “Glossary