Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

An audit is being undertaken for Atlantic Ltd for the year ended 30 June 2013. While assessing the risk of material misstatement you identify that a large number of debtors are exceeding 60 days where...

1 answer below »

An audit is being undertaken for Atlantic Ltd for the year ended 30 June 2013. While assessing the risk of material misstatement you identify that a large number of debtors are exceeding 60 days where credit terms are 30 days.
During your analysis the following figures were extracted:
Year end 30/6/2012 – Provision for Doubtful Debts $35,000, Sales $3,500,000
Year end 30/6/2013 - Provision for Doubtful Debts $570,000, Sales $5,700,000
The profit for the year ended 30/6/2013 is $1,500,000.
Questions:

  1. The doubtful debts policy in Atlantic’s accounting policy manual is that 1% of sales should be deemed to be doubtful debts. Discuss the relevance of the company policy to the firms’ treatment of doubtful debts for the year ended 30/6/2013? How would the auditor determine whether the 30/6/2013 doubtful debts calculation for 2013 is reasonable?

(7 Marks)
  1. Materiality is an important part of audit considerations. Discuss the nature of materiality and the basis for its calculation. With reference to the audit of Atlantic Ltd, if the calculation of doubtful debts is found to be overstated, explain at what level (or at what amount) you would expect the variance to be material and therefore request the company to alter their estimate in the accounts.

(8 marks)
(Total 15 Marks)

Document Preview:

Case Study An audit is being undertaken for Atlantic Ltd for the year ended 30 June 2013. While assessing the risk of material misstatement you identify that a large number of debtors are exceeding 60 days where credit terms are 30 days. During your analysis the following figures were extracted: Year end 30/6/2012 – Provision for Doubtful Debts $35,000, Sales $3,500,000 Year end 30/6/2013 - Provision for Doubtful Debts $570,000, Sales $5,700,000 The profit for the year ended 30/6/2013 is $1,500,000. Questions: The doubtful debts policy in Atlantic’s accounting policy manual is that 1% of sales should be deemed to be doubtful debts. Discuss the relevance of the company policy to the firms’ treatment of doubtful debts for the year ended 30/6/2013? How would the auditor determine whether the 30/6/2013 doubtful debts calculation for 2013 is reasonable? XXXXXXXXXXMarks) Materiality is an important part of audit considerations. Discuss the nature of materiality and the basis for its calculation. With reference to the audit of Atlantic Ltd, if the calculation of doubtful debts is found to be overstated, explain at what level (or at what amount) you would expect the variance to be material and therefore request the company to alter their estimate in the accounts. (8 marks) XXXXXXXXXXTotal 15 Marks)

Answered Same Day Dec 23, 2021

Solution

Robert answered on Dec 23 2021
119 Votes
The policy to take 1% of total sales as doubtful debt by Atlantic Ltd is very conservative in nature. It
is taking 1% as doubtful debt every year but this is not right as most of the creditors extended their
credit period time which shows the quality of credit is risky. According to me, management is
using these rules for the purpose of intentionally embellishing their financial statement or
elated financial statements by showing higher profit through the wrong treatment of
doubtful debt. (Frigo,Mark,2002,pp-215-240) As per the Audit Standards AU 520, the audit
eport should reflect the true and fair view of the financial statements; here true and fair
view is dependent on the financial statements and not for embellishing the financial
statements. If the management does so, than they are violating the true and fair view
statement. Moreover the auditor should in that case issue an Qualified report and state the
facts that they are using some approved exceptions to accounting rules. If the reporting
entities are making approved exceptions to accounting rules for the purpose of intentionally
embellishing the report through wrong treatment of doubtful debt, then it is wrong and
must be co
ect. In this case the provision to take 1% is very low and not up to the marks
looking after the quality of credit. No doubt the auditor has to obtain sufficient and
easonable evidence...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here