Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Accounting for Decision MakingTrimester 3, 2012-13Page 2NOTE the following general submission pointscontinued:3.Only ONE HARDCOPYof assignment planner and final assignment per groupis to...

1 answer below »
Accounting for Decision MakingTrimester 3, 2012-13Page 2NOTE the following general submission pointscontinued:3.Only ONE HARDCOPYof assignment planner and final assignment per groupis to besubmitted.You MUSTinclude an ASSIGNMENT COVERSHEETonly for your hard copyversion of your final assignment with all names included.Each student must submit aseparate Assignment CoverSheetwith the HARDCOPYof theirfinal assignment. If an assignment coversheet is not attached NO MARKSwill be given. Additionally,ONEcopyof the Assignment Mark Sheet(attached on page 9of thisassignment) must also be submitted with your assignment. Do NOTsubmit assignment in a plastic folder or plastic pocket.4.This assignment consists of TWO components -an assignmentplannerANDfinal assignment: both components must be completed. Submission of your Assignment Planner will carry two (2)marks which will be awardedwith the final assignment submission(see page 4for requirements)5. THEASSIGNMENT PLANNER ANDFINAL ASSIGNMENTMUSTBETYPED. The finalassignment must beSINGLE SIDED, using Arial 12 fontsize, properly referencedand ideally 1.5 line spacing (refer to µ*XLGHtoassignmentwriting and referencing booklet) andinclude a REFERENCE LIST(minimum of 6 references should be used)inalphabetical orderoutlining the textbook(s) and any articles, electronicsources etc. used. The Harvard styleshould be used for referencing and citations. Marks will bedeductedif yourwork is not properlyreferenced or a reference list notattached. Read andadhere to the Assignment Submissionand Plagiarism Notice on page 6 ofyour unit outlinecarefully.If students are found copying from other students or using a previousWULPHVWHU¶Vassignment to complete this assignment then a ZERO result will be awarded.6.Hardcopy of assignments VKRXOGEHSODFHGLQ\RXUOHFWXUHU¶VSLJHRQKROHORcated in building la on level 4 MIBT (next to room la4.111) by the due date.7. Word limit for report is 2000 words minimum to2500 wordsmaximum (word limit excludes referencelistand appendices). NOTE:Assignments submitted late and without prior approval will be penalised. A penalty of 10% of the available marks will be deducted for every day the assignment is late. Assignments received after a week, and without approved extension, will not be marked. These will be held until final grading and may be taken into consideration in a pass/fail situation. Please note that, an extension will only be given by the Unit Coordinator/lecturer and must be requested at least 48 hours prior to submission date.Please read checklist guidelines on page 8of this document.
MAA103 ±Accounting for Decision MakingTrimester 3, 2012-13Page 3Final Assignment requirements:2000 words minimum to 2500 words maximum(excluding appendicesand reference list) for final assignment. A deduction of 2marks will apply if the number of words is 10% under2000 words or overby more than 10%of 2500 words. Assignment Objective:The objective for this assignment is for you to perform and interpret financial ratios, that is, provide ratio analysis of financial statements over a two year period (2011 through 2012)and together with all other relevant information, advise on these organisations as investment opportunities. The companies to be analysed are:1.Myer Holdings Ltd.2.Harvey Norman Holdings Ltd.MyerHoldings Ltd.Harvey NormanHoldingsLtd.KEY RATIOS2011201220112012Gross Profit Margin44.07%46.80%27.43%27.14%Net Profit Margin9.65%8.80%15.05%14.07%Return on Equity19.05%16.04%10.68%8.85%Asset Turnover(Times)1.35 times1.360.387times0.3561 timesReturn on Assets9.59%8.55%6.66%5.93%Inventory Turnover (Days)52.5 days53.9 days4.62 times5.34 timesDebtors Turnover (Days)0.67 days0.64 days257 days240 daysCreditors Turnover (Days)50 days47.9 days212 days212 daysCurrent Ratio XXXXXXXXXX63Quick Ratio XXXXXXXXXX35Debt Asset Ratio (Total Debt)56.36%54.29%42.63%44.34%Debt Equity Ratio(Total Debt XXXXXXXXXX7967Times Interest Earned (Times)7.25 times7.73 times9.69 times5.59 timesPlease note all ratios provided have been taken fromthe database Finanalysisand some have been calculated manually. Please accept these ratios as a given. You are not required to show calculations for the ratios providedabove.
Answered Same Day Dec 21, 2021

Solution

David answered on Dec 21 2021
121 Votes
Introduction:
Introduction:
Myer Holdings Ltd (ASX: MYR) is a Melbourne; Australia based company, and is Australia’s largest departmental stores chain. Its offerings include womenswear, cosmetics, fragrance & personal care, fashion accessories, electrical, homewares, toys, stationaries, food & confectionaries, travel goods, miss shop (youth). It has network of about 68 retail stores in vintage locations across Australia. Its
and composition consists three segments: Myer Exclusive
anch, National and International Brand, Concessions.
Harvey Norman Holdings Ltd (ASX: HVN) is a New South Wales, Australia based company, leading retail chain store. It offers electrical, furniture, computerized communication, computer, bedding goods and home improvements. It has unique organization structure of franchise for each of its offering. So, typically its super store consist 3-4 franchise operator offering different goods, with common warehouse, but different staff and administration. Its leading
and names include Harvey Norman, Domayne and Joyce Mayne. It has its franchises in Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, Singapore, Malaysia, Slovenia and Crotia.
The below report give the comparative overview of various financial aspects of above-mentioned two companies. The evaluation is relative to each other and aims at analyzing the financial detail of both in order to provide assistance in making judgments about potential investment opportunity.
Ratio:
A) Profitability: The profitability ratios measure the performance of an entity in terms of profit generated relative to revenues, equity, assets and/or capital.
a. Gross profit margin indicates the sales minus direct cost incu
ed for sale. Higher the gross profit margin, better the company’s profitable ability. Myer holding has quite higher gross profit margins than that of Harvey. Further, the gross profit margins of Myer have improved from 2011 to 2012, while the ratio has declined in case of Harvey. That means the Myer has been able to control or reduce its direct cost of selling goods, while Harvey could not keep the cost control.
. Net profit margin considers deduction of all operating and non-operating expenses from revenues and hence, indicates the net profiting ability of an entity. The net profit margins of both companies declined from 2011 to 2012, which may be caused due to higher costs or reduction in selling price. However, it is unclear that the increase in operational cost or non-operational cost (like interest) caused net profits to decline.
Despite having higher gross profit margins, the net profit margins of Myer are significantly lower than Harvey. One reason can be the higher interest expenses, as the debt to assets ratio of Myer is quite higher than that of Harvey.
c. Return on equity and return on assets:
In case of return on assets, the Myer definitely has edge over Harvey with higher return on assets in both 2011 and 2012. The possible reason for higher return is lower asset base. The return on assets = Assets turnover X Net profit margins
Despite of having lower net profit margins, the Myer could achieve higher return on assets due to high asset turnover, which indicate its superior operational efficiency.
Return on equity of Myer is quite higher (largely double) than that of Harvey, thanks to its (Myer’s) lower equity base and financial leverage.
Return on equity = Return on assets X financial leverage
Both the return on assets and financial leverage are higher Myer, and contributing to higher return on equity.
Due to net profits decline from 2011 to 2012, the return on assets and return on equity decreased for both the companies in 2012 from 2011. In nutshell, from profitability point of view, the Myer is superior to Harvey due to higher return on assets and equity, mainly on account of operational efficiency and resort of financial leverage. The concern is lower net profitability of Myer, which if decline further; the return on equity would decrease faster than that of Harvey.
B) Efficiency: The efficiency of an entity can be measure by analyzing the activity ratios, also known as asset utilization ratios. These ratios indicate the efficiency of an entity in managing its assets.
a. Assets turnover ratio: The ratio shows the times of revenues generated from given total asset base over a reporting period. If it is 1 time, then implies revenue equal to total assets used in a reporting period.
The...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here