Answer two questions (100 points)
Your answers should show your ability to: (1) integrate topics, materials and readings (required and recommended) covered in the course, (2) apply theories and/or concepts to empirical information, (3) express ideas clearly, and (4) reason logically and critically, with arguments and conclusions supported by evidence
Question 1 (compulsory question: 60 points, 4-5 pages double-spaced, 12 font)
Campbell and Ratner argued in their Foreign Affairs article (July/August 2018) that U.S. diplomatic and political engagement with Beijing has not
ought long expected political and economic openness to China. They also contend that neither military power nor regional balancing has stopped Beijing from seeking to displace the U.S. as the regional hegemon. Identify the economic, diplomatic and security policies pursued by the Clinton, Bush and Obama Administrations that sought to liberalise China’s internal development and external behaviour in support of the U.S.-led neoliberal global order. Refer to one of the following critiques of the Campbell and Ratner reading made by Wang Jisi, Stapleton Roy, Aaron Friedberg, Christensen & Kim, Nye or Li. In your opinion, which of these authors makes the most persuasive critique for or against Campbell and Ratner’s argument? Back up your point of view with supporting evidence.
Answer one question (40 points, 3-4 pages double-spaced, 12 font)
2. Examine the evolution of United State-Japan security relations from the end of World War Two to the present, paying attention to differences between the Cold War and the post-Cold War security environment in East Asia. Identify significant developments, key issues and major problems in that aspect of the relationship. What have been the most significant recent developments? Do you think the cu
ent Abe government will
ing significant changes to the security relationship? Is so, or if not, why? Illustrate your arguments with supporting evidence.