Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

While the implementation plan prepares students to apply their research to the problem or issue they have identified for their capstone project change proposal, the literature review enables students...

1 answer below »

While the implementation plan prepares students to apply their research to the problem or issue they have identified for their capstone project change proposal, the literature review enables students to map out and move into the active planning and development stages of the project.

A literature review analyzes how current research supports the PICOT, as well as identifies what is known and what is not known in the evidence. Students will use the information from the earlier PICOT Question Paper and Literature Evaluation Table assignments to develop a 750-1,000 word review that includes the following sections:

  1. Title page
  2. Introduction section
  3. A comparison of research questions
  4. A comparison of sample populations
  5. A comparison of the limitations of the study
  6. A conclusion section, incorporating recommendations for further research

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is not required. I will attach rubric, PICOT, and Literature Evaluation table.

Answered Same Day Nov 17, 2021

Solution

Abhishek answered on Nov 20 2021
146 Votes
Running Head: NURSING        1
NURSING         7
NURSING
AN INTERVENTION TO IMPROVE THE CATHETER ASSOCIATED URINARY TRACT INFECTION
Table of Contents
Introduction    3
A Comparison to Research Questions    3
A Comparison to Sample Populations    4
A Comparison of the Limitations of the Study    5
Conclusion and Recommendations    5
References    7
Introduction
The paper presents a wide range of knowledge regarding Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) and its cause by presenting a ling elaboration of CAUTI that is Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection. The presentation of a new dimension and way of catheter insertion in different ways to avoid any kind of issue and infection is the purpose of this paper. Further, the paper evaluates the causes of CAUTI and attempts to find if the only insertion of a catheter is responsible for CAUTI (Ca
, 2017).
With identification and analysis of the causes and reasons of CAUTI, the reasons for urinary tract infection and different symptoms and implications associated with the single cause of interaction have been presented to demonstrate the process and its evaluation. The importance of the catheter insertion and the impact of this have been presented over the paper to highlight the effect it consisted with.
In equal measure, it presents the beneficial impact that has often been received in medication and health support systems to recover the health status of people. However, alternative dimensions to the use of catheters have also been presented to the context of this piece by showing the necessity of training and learning in cooperation of the physicians to the nurses to make alternative use of the catheters.
A Comparison to Research Questions
The research questions of Patel et al. (2017) provoke thought regarding the alternative use of a catheter and a different prospect of using a catheter to stop the
eeding of infections. A consideration is made after evaluation that, during the intervention as well as the pre-intervention phase there is a chance of decreasing infection rate. In the paper by Meddings et al. (2019), the questions of the research reveal that roper practices and training associated with the insertion technique of the nurses can
ing improvisation to this issue and reduce the chances of CAUTI.
Hence, the question differs from the first question in a different mode of usage and induction of training to modify the use of catheters by nurses so that risk...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here