Task Description
Students are required to create a na
ated PowerPoint presentation on Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) that is 8-10 minutes in duration.
Your presentation will need to address the following points:
· Introduction to the disease and significance in Australia
· Risk Factors
· Pathophysiology of disease
· Clinical manifestations with pathophysiological rationale
· Treatment options
· Implications for clinical practice
The na
ated PowerPoint must be uploaded to the canvas site prior to the due date.
Important Information
The na
ated PowerPoint must be:
· A total of 8 slides, including a title and reference slide.
· Within the allocated duration (8-10 minutes).
· After 10min the assessment will not be marked.
· No additional academic penalty will be applied for an assessment that is under 8 min in duration.
· N.B. Students are strongly encouraged to avoid presentations that do not meet the minimum duration of 8 minutes, it is unlikely that the assessment will address the requirements of the assessment as setout in the marking ru
ic.
· Supported by peer-reviewed, academic literature published within the past 5 years.
· Including the use of textbooks published in the Australian and New Zealand context.
· References must be in line with APA 7 guidelines.
Any images used (including flowcharts or concept maps) must be the student’s own work, with the relevant source/s cited in line with APA 7 guidelines.
This is an individual assignment - each student is required to submit a PowerPoint presentation in line with the assessment instructions and marking ru
ic.
Ru
ic
10201 PowerPoint Presentation
10201 PowerPoint Presentation
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeOverview of the disease state
Provides an overview of the assigned disease state including risk factors, clinical manifestations, treatment options and implications for practice.
Information presented is accurate and demonstrates depth of understanding of key principles of the disease state.
25 to >21.0 Pts
85- 100% (HD)
Excellent overview of the assigned disease state including risk factors, clinical manifestations, treatment options and implications for practice. Information presented is accurate and demonstrates excellent depth of understanding of key principles of the disease state. No or minor e
ors or inconsistencies noted in presentation.
21 to >18.5 Pts
75-84% (D)
Very good overview of the assigned disease state including risk factors, clinical manifestations, treatment options and implications for practice. Information presented is accurate and demonstrates very good depth of understanding of key principles of the disease state, with minor omissions, e
ors or inconsistencies.
18.5 to >16.0 Pts
65-74% (C)
Good overview of the assigned disease state including risk factors, clinical manifestations, treatment options and implications for practice. Information presented is mostly accurate and demonstrates good depth of understanding of key principles of the disease state, with several omissions, e
ors or inconsistencies.
16 to >12.25 Pts
50-64% (P)
Some overview of the assigned disease state including risk factors, clinical manifestations, treatment options and implications for practice. Information presented is mostly accurate and demonstrates some depth of understanding of key principles of the disease state, with consistent omissions, e
ors or inconsistencies.
12.25 to >0 Pts
0-49%
Minimal or absent overview of the assigned disease state including risk factors, clinical manifestations, treatment options and implications for practice. Information presented is inaccurate and demonstrates minimal or absent depth of understanding of key principles of the disease state with significant omissions, e
ors or inconsistencies
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeOverview of variation from homeostasis.
Provides an overview of the pathophysiology related to the assigned disease state, including variation from homeostasis.
Information presented is accurate and demonstrates depth of understanding of pathophysiology related to the disease state.
25 to >21.0 Pts
85- 100% (HD)
Excellent overview of the pathophysiology related to the assigned disease state, including variation from homeostasis. Information presented is accurate and demonstrates excellent depth of understanding of pathophysiology related to the disease state. No or minor e
ors or inconsistencies noted in presentation.
21 to >18.5 Pts
75-84% (D)
Very good overview of the pathophysiology related to the assigned disease state, including variation from homeostasis. Information presented is accurate and demonstrates very good depth of understanding of pathophysiology related to the disease state, with minor omissions, e
ors or inconsistencies.
18.5 to >16.0 Pts
65-74% (C)
Good an overview of the pathophysiology related to the assigned disease state, including variation from homeostasis. Information presented is mostly accurate and demonstrates good depth of understanding pathophysiology related to the disease state, with several omissions, e
ors or inconsistencies.
16 to >12.25 Pts
50-64% (P)
Some overview of the pathophysiology related to the assigned disease state, including variation from homeostasis. Information presented is mostly accurate and demonstrates some depth of understanding of pathophysiology related to the disease state, with consistent omissions, e
ors or inconsistencies
12.25 to >0 Pts
0-49%
Minimal or absent overview of the pathophysiology related to the assigned disease state, including variation from homeostasis. Information presented is inaccurate and demonstrates minimal or absent depth of understanding pathophysiology related to the disease state, with significant omissions, e
ors or inconsistencies
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDesign and presentation
Use of PowerPoint platform to present a short oral presentation.
Na
ation is clear and is delivered in 8-10 minutes.
Clear presentation of information on each PowerPoint slide, with consideration given to graphic design including use of colour, fonts and imagery.
Follows conventional academic approach including – academic language, grammar, spelling, punctuation and syntax in both the written and na
ated components.
20 to >16.8 Pts
85- 100% (HD)
Excellent standard of academic writing with co
ect grammar, writing, spelling and syntax. Excellent structure and articulation of ideas within the assessment that reflects assessment instructions.
16.8 to >14.8 Pts
75-84% (D)
Very good standard of academic writing with co
ect grammar, writing, spelling and syntax. Very good structure and articulation of ideas within the assessment that reflects assessment instructions.
14.8 to >12.8 Pts
65-74% (C)
Good standard of academic writing with mostly co
ect grammar, writing, spelling and syntax. Good structure and articulation of ideas within the assessment that mostly reflects assessment instructions.
12.8 to >9.9 Pts
50-64% (P)
Adequate standard of academic writing with a number of e
ors in grammar, writing, spelling and syntax. Adequate structure and articulation of ideas within the assessment that somewhat reflects assessment instructions.
9.9 to >0 Pts
0-49%
Minimal or absent standard of academic writing with a number of e
ors in grammar, writing, spelling and syntax. Minimal or absent structure or articulation of ideas within the assessment that does not reflect assessment instructions.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeReferences
Utilised and appropriately referenced at least five (5) sources using the APA 7th edition referencing style.
Key elements identified in the PowerPoint poster and na
ated content are supported by evidence from high-quality sources
10 to >8.4 Pts
85- 100% (HD)
Excellent use of literature to support this assessment. This includes high-quality peer-reviewed sources. References and reference list adheres to APA 7th edition referencing with no e
ors or unsupported claims in the assessment
8.4 to >7.4 Pts
75-84% (D)
Very good use of literature to support this assessment. This includes good-quality peer-reviewed sources. References and reference list adheres to APA 7th edition referencing with minimal e
ors or some unsupported claims in the assessment
7.4 to >6.4 Pts
65-74% (C)
Good use of literature to support this assessment. This includes good-quality peer-reviewed sources. References and reference list mostly adheres to APA 7th edition referencing with some e
ors or unsupported claims in the assessment
6.4 to >4.9 Pts
50-64% (P)
Adequate use of literature to support this assessment. This includes some use of quality peer-reviewed sources. References and reference list somewhat adheres to APA 7th edition referencing with e
ors or unsupported claims evident in the assessment
4.9 to >0 Pts
0-49%
Minimal or absent use of literature to support this assessment. There are minimal or absent sources used to support the assessment. References and reference list minimally adheres to APA 7th edition referencing with a number of e
ors or unsupported claims in the assessment
10 pts
Total points: 80