9/27/22, 7:40 PM Assessment task 2
https:
mit.instructure.com/courses/91258/assignments/ XXXXXXXXXX/4
Criteria Ratings
style
Adheres to
style
equirements;
including use
of assignment
guidelines;
such as word
limit, double-
spacing, use of
header &
footer, page
numbers, and
size-12 font
1 Pts
HD
All style
equirements
and
assignment
guidelines
adhered to.
0.7 Pts
D
The majority of
style requirements
have been
adhered to,
although there are
still some mino
formatting e
ors.
0.6 Pts
C
You have met the
assignment
guidelines
satisfactorily,
although you have
not followed two o
more of the required
criteria.
0.5 Pts
P
You have adhered to the style requirements at a
asic level although you have not followed the
guidelines fully. Word limit not adhered to. Some
asic formatting requirements not included; such
as page numbers, headings, double spacing,
font size readable.
0 Pts
F
You have not adhered to the style
equirements in accordance with the
assignment guidelines. No double spacing.
Font size inco
ect, making it difficult to read.
Word limit not adhered to. No page numbers.
No use of headings to guide the reader.
academic
writing
Spelling,
grammar and
paragraph
structure
meets
academic
standards
3 Pts
HD
Excellent
paragraph
structure.
Professional
language
used
throughout,
with well-
defined
terms.
2.5 Pts
D
You have
generally met the
academic
standards fo
writing, with few
spelling and
punctuation
e
ors evident.
Your paragraph
structure is good,
with good use of
professional
language. You
still need to
consistently
define terms
2 Pts
C
Your submission reads
well, though some
sentences are a bit
confusing and/o
ambling. You use
professional language
well, but still need to
define some terms.
Your paragraphs need
to each have a key
idea or focus, which
then links to the next
logically, enabling a
flow of information.
1.5 Pts
P
There are a number of spelling
and grammatical e
ors
throughout, which detract from
your content and flow of ideas.
Terms are inadequately defined
throughout, with your use of
professional language limited.
Paragraphs are not structured
co
ectly, with too much use of
point form in your responses.
You need to review co
ect
paragraph structure and its use
in academic writing.
1 Pts
F
Many spelling and
punctuation e
ors. Sentence
structure is often unclear. No
use of meaningful paragraphs
to allow logical flow of
content. Poor use of
professional language. No
definition of terms. You need
to consult with the Study and
Learning Centre fo
assistance with writing skills;
efore completing any furthe
academic writing
assessments.
0 Pts
F
Many spelling and
punctuation e
ors. Sentence
structure is often unclear. No
use of meaningful paragraphs
to allow logical flow of
content. Poor use of
professional language. No
definition of terms. You need
to consult with the Study and
Learning Centre fo
assistance with writing skills;
efore completing any furthe
academic writing
assessments.
esponses to
the questions
Provides a
comprehensive
esponse to
the criteria and
analysis of the
topic
25 Pts
HD
You have
comprehensively
answered the
question to a
high standard of
detail.
22.5 Pts
HD
You have
comprehensively
answered the
question to a
high standard of
detail.
21.25 Pts
D
You have
answered
the
question
well, and in
appropriate
detail. You
could have
provided
more detail
in some
areas.
18.75 Pts
D
You have
answered
the
question
well, and in
appropriate
detail. You
could have
provided
more detail
in some
areas.
16.88 Pts
C
You
answer is
satisfactorily
esearched,
and
addresses
the key
criteria.
When you
focus on
only one o
two key
points, you
need to
justify this
and also
iefly list
the othe
points not
covered in
detail.
15 Pts
C
You
answer is
satisfactorily
esearched,
and
addresses
the key
criteria.
When you
focus on
only one o
two key
points, you
need to
justify this
and also
iefly list
the othe
points not
covered in
detail.
13.75 Pts
P
You
esponse
to the
question is
answered
to an
adequate
level only,
and
equire
more
detail and
also to be
applied
more
specifically
to the
questions
12.5 Pts
P
You
esponse
to the
question is
answered
to an
adequate
level only,
and
equire
more
detail and
also to be
applied
more
specifically
to the
questions
6.25 Pts
F
The question
is
inadequately
answered.
Poo
understanding
of the
question. You
have not
provided
ationales fo
the points that
you identify.
You
esponse is
too general
and not
focused on
the question.
2.5 Pts
F
The question
is
inadequately
answered.
Poo
understanding
of the
question. You
have not
provided
ationales fo
the points that
you identify.
You
esponse is
too general
and not
focused on
the question.
Noo
Noo
Noo
9/27/22, 7:40 PM Assessment task 2
https:
mit.instructure.com/courses/91258/assignments/ XXXXXXXXXX/4
Criteria Ratings
evidence
ased
esponses
Effectively links
evidence-
ased
information to
the analysis
10 Pts
HD
You
effectively
linked
quality
esearch
ased
evidence
to justify
each of
you
ationales.
8.67 Pts
HD
You
effectively
linked
quality
esearch
ased
evidence
to justify
each of
you
ationales.
8 Pts
D
You
provide
good
evidence
for most
of you
ationales;
although
you need
to be
more
consistent
with you
level of
esearch.
7.33 Pts
D
You
provide
good
evidence
for most
of you
ationales;
although
you need
to be
more
consistent
with you
level of
esearch.
6.67 Pts
C
The
eferences
used
provide
adequate
evidence
for you
esponse,
ut you
have not
searched
widely
enough in
some
areas.
6 Pts
C
The
eferences
used
provide
adequate
evidence
for you
esponse,
ut you
have not
searched
widely
enough in
some
areas.
5.67 Pts
P
Your use of
evidence-
ased
information
is limited to
the course
textbooks,
and reflects
inadequate
esearch.
You have
met the
eference
equirements
at a basic
level only.
5 Pts
P
Your use of
evidence-
ased
information
is limited to
the course
textbooks,
and reflects
inadequate
esearch.
You have
met the
eference
equirements
at a basic
level only.
3.33 Pts
F
Poor use of evidence
to support you
esponse. Your lack
of supporting
evidence indicates
inadequate research
into the topic
question. No o
inadequate
eferences cited
throughout you
paper. References
used are not
contemporary o
eflective of cu
ent
practice.
1.33 Pts
F
Poor use of evidence
to support you
esponse. Your lack
of supporting
evidence indicates
inadequate research
into the topic
question. No o
inadequate
eferences cited
throughout you
paper. References
used are not
contemporary o
eflective of cu
ent
practice.
eference
ecency
Utilises
elevant and
contemporary
eferences in
esponse
2 Pts
HD
You have
provided an
excellent list of
eferences;
with the
majority of
eferences
1.4 Pts
D
You have provided a relevant
list of references; though you
still need to ensure that the
majority of references used are
contemporary and pee
eviewed.
1.2 Pts
C
References used reflect adequate research
into the topic, although your use of web-
ased information does not adhere to the
case study guidelines. You need to use
more evidence-based peer reviewed
journals.
1 Pts
P
Some references used are olde
than 10 years. You have overused
non peer-reviewed and web-
ased information, which does not
lend credibility to your responses.
0 Pts
F
Many of you
eferences are olde
than 10 years. Many of
your references are
web-based and are not
peer reviewed.
intext
eferencing
Intext
eferencing
used
throughout.
Referencing
formatted in
accordance
with APA
equirements
5 Pts
HD
Your intext
eferencing
and final
eference list
demonstrate
a high level
of
consistency
and are
formatted
co
ectly and
according to
APA
guidelines.
4.16 Pts
D
Your use of intext
eferencing is good,
and generally
consistent. Reference
list indicates good use
of APA guidelines fo
most reference
citations. Please read
comments made
throughout which
indicate where
improvements can be
made.
3.34 Pts
C
Intext referencing is
used throughout, but
is inconsistent. You
need to review the
use of quotes and
paraphrasing intext.
Your use of et al. is
inco
ect. You
eference list is not in
alphabetical order.
You must review the
APA guidelines.
2.5 Pts
P
You have not been
consistent in your citation of
eferences throughout this
paper. You have not
formatted your intext
eferencing according to
APA. Your reference list is
not formatted co
ectly. You
eference list is missing
some information, and does
not adhere completely to
APA requirements.
1.66 Pts
F
Formatting of intext
eferences inco
ect and not
according to APA
equirements. Reference list
is incomplete and is not
formatted according to APA
equirements. Your reference
list does not meet the
eferencing requirements of
the Discipline of Nursing &
Midwifery, as outlined in the
Style Guide.
0 Pts
F
Formatting of intext
eferences inco
ect and not
according to APA
equirements. Reference list
is incomplete and is not
formatted according to APA
equirements. Your reference
list does not meet the
eferencing requirements of
the Discipline of Nursing &
Midwifery, as outlined in the
Style Guide.
introduction
Topic is
introduced
clearly and
succinctly
2 Pts
HD
You provide an excellent
introduction to you
submission, and clearly
explain how you intend
to answer the case study
question.
1.5 Pts
D
Your general
introduction is
good, with a
clear summary
of the key
points to be
covered.
1.2 Pts
C
You introduce the case study
well, making clear links to the
topic question. You have not
stated clearly enough how
you intend to set out you
esponse.
1 Pts
P
Your introduction is only a
estatement of what the case
study is about, and doesn’t
adequately state how you are
going to set out your response
to the question.
0.5 Pts
F
Your introduction is
either absent or too
ief, and doesn’t
state what you
intend to cover in
your submission.
0 Pts
F
Your introduction is
either absent or too
ief, and doesn’t
state what you
intend to cover in
your submission.
Noo
Noo
9/27/22, 7:40 PM Assessment task 2
https:
mit.instructure.com/courses/91258/assignments/ XXXXXXXXXX/4
Total p
Criteria Ratings
Conclusion
Conclusion
provides a
concise
summary of
main points
covered
2 Pts
HD
Your conclusion provides a
high quality summary of the
major points covered in you
esponses, all linked well to
the case study.
1.5 Pts
D
You summarise the main
components of you
esponses, but need to
link them more
consistently to the case
study.
1.2 Pts
C
You sum up the major focus of
the case study satisfactorily,
ut need to also contextualise
the key points of you
esponses to the case study.
1 Pts
P
Concluding comments
are too
ief, and do
not summarise the
main components of
your paper adequately.
0.5 Pts
F
No conclusion is
evident. You have
not summarised
the main
components of
your paper.
0 Pts
F
No conclusion is
evident. You have
not summarised
the main
components of
your paper.
Noo
Noor