Visual Infographics present information, data, or knowledge intended to quickly and clearly communicate information to an audience. You are to research a chronic and/or complex health issue that...

Visual Infographics present information, data, or knowledge intended to quickly and clearly communicate information to an audience.
You are to research a chronic and/or complex health issue that interests you and develop an infographic, suitable for social media, that uses best available evidence to communicate information about health promotion or primary care and self-management for people and their families living with the chronic and/or complex health issue.
You will be required to submit ONE PDF document via URKUND and Canvas containing:
· Infographic suitable for social media as a PDF (1 page)
· Summary of information (1000 words, +/- 10%) used to inform the details in your Infographic in relation to health promotion or primary care and self-management, including early detection and secondary management strategies.
· Reference list containing high quality, peer reviewed, cu
ent (less than 10 years) literature and credible professional websites.
Infographic:
You first step is to research and collate information about a chronic and/or complex health issue that interests you. Ensure you are using up to date, reliable and relevant sources. From that information identify the key points you would like to make in the infographic.
The next step is to create the Infographic using Canva (Links to an external site.). The free version is sufficient for this assessment. 
Once you have accessed the online program, search for Infographic. You can choose one of many templates available or create your own. Have fun and get creative.
Review the relevant areas of the ru
ic to ensure you are meeting the assessment requirements. Sources of information do not need to be cited on the Infographic as you will be providing them in your Summary.
Summary of Information:
The Summary of information (1000 words, +/- 10%) includes intext citations and must demonstrate a fluent professional/academic writing style within the word count.
The Summary of information provides the supporting evidence for details and expands on the
ief information within your Infographic.
The reference list is accurate using APA 7th Ed referencing system and contains high quality, peer reviewed, cu
ent (less than 10 years) literature. Use of credible professional websites is acceptable, but please ensure their quality, relevance, and cu
ency of information.
As with all academic assessments, students are required to comply with the University's policy and procedure for assessment items, inclusive of ensuring academic integrity of their work. All work must be the students own original work. Any suspicions of academic misconduct will be refe
ed to the ADE as per university policy.
The Assessment will be addressing learning outcomes:
1. Articulate health promotion or primary care in the context of chronic and complex care;
2. Identify key self-management principles and strategies
3. Demonstrate understanding of intensive (focused) care coordination for people with complex, unstable and como
id conditions during hospitalisation, including early detection and secondary prevention strategies.
Ru
ic
Assessment 2: Visual Infographic & Written Summary
    Assessment 2: Visual Infographic & Written Summary
    Criteria
    Ratings
    Pts
    This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeInfographic articulates health promotion or primary care for the chosen chronic and/or complex health issue
        10 to >8.5 Pts
HD
Provides a sophisticated, thoroughly considered, and comprehensive synthesis of research data and other reliable evidence within the Infographic which articulates health promotion or primary care for the chosen chronic and/or complex health issue into a clearly coherent visual na
ative
    8.5 to >7.5 Pts
D
Provides a comprehensive synthesis of research data and other reliable evidence within the Infographic which articulates health promotion or primary care for the chosen chronic and/or complex health issue into a mostly coherent visual na
ative
    7.5 to >6.5 Pts
CR
Provides a reasonable synthesis of research data and other reliable evidence within the Infographic which articulates health promotion or primary care for the chosen chronic and/or complex health issue into a visual na
ative that is overall clea
    6.5 to >5.0 Pts
P
Provides an adequate synthesis of research data and other reliable evidence within the Infographic which articulates health promotion or primary care for the chosen chronic and/or complex health issue into a visual na
ative that is mostly clea
    5 to >0 Pts
NX
Provides an unsatisfactory response with minimal or no synthesis of research data and other reliable evidence within the Infographic which articulates health promotion or primary care for the chosen chronic and/or complex health issue into a visual na
ative that lacks coherence
    10 pts
    This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeIdentify key self-management principles and strategies, early detection and secondary prevention strategies for people and their families living with the chronic and/or complex health issue.
        10 to >8.5 Pts
HD
Provides a sophisticated, thoroughly considered, and comprehensive response that clearly identifies and includes key self-management principles and strategies, early detection and secondary prevention strategies within the Infographic relating to the chosen health issue.
    8.5 to >7.5 Pts
D
Provides a comprehensive response that identifies and includes key self-management principles and strategies, early detection and secondary prevention strategies within the Infographic relating to the chosen health issue.
    7.5 to >6.5 Pts
CR
Provides a reasonable response that identifies and includes most of the key self-management principles and strategies, early detection and secondary prevention strategies within the Infographic relating to the chosen health issue.
    6.5 to >5.0 Pts
P
Provides an adequate response that identifies and includes some of the key self-management principles and strategies, early detection and secondary prevention strategies within the Infographic relating to the chosen health issue.
    5 to >0 Pts
NX
Provides an unsatisfactory response with minimal to no identification and inclusion of key self-management principles and strategies, early detection and secondary prevention strategies within the Infographic relating to the chosen health issue.
    10 pts
    This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeThe flow of ideas is structured visually to ensure the Infographic is organised and logical for readability and engagement
        5 to >4.2 Pts
HD
Exceptional flow of ideas which is well structured, organised, and logical. This enables clear readability due to the compelling layout.
    4.2 to >4.0 Pts
D
Excellent flow of ideas which are organised and logical, enabling readability due to the organised layout.
    4 to >3.2 Pts
CR
Good flow of ideas that are overall organised and logical, enabling readability through a reasonable layout which demonstrates some areas for improvement.
    3.2 to >2.5 Pts
P
Reasonable flow of ideas which are somewhat organised. Consideration of the layout required further attention to readability.
    2.5 to >0 Pts
NX
Poor flow of ideas which are not well organised or logical. Readability is compromised due to a confused and/or illogical layout.
    5 pts
    This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeWritten summary of information goes beyond generalisations to indicate deeper knowledge of the topic area.
        10 to >8.5 Pts
HD
Exceptional content that goes well beyond generalisations to indicate significant knowledge of the topic area.
    8.5 to >7.5 Pts
D
Excellent content that goes beyond generalisations to indicate good knowledge of the topic area.
    7.5 to >6.5 Pts
CR
Good content that overall goes beyond generalisations to indicate reasonable knowledge of the topic area.
    6.5 to >5.0 Pts
P
Adequate content which includes several generalisations which indicate more basic knowledge of the topic area.
    5 to >0 Pts
NX
Poor content defined by generalisations indicating limited knowledge of the topic area.
    10 pts
    This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeScholarly approach to the written summary of information and reference list. Demonstrates attention to detail appropriate for academic writing, references, and in-text citations – consistent with APA 7th Style.
        5 to >4.2 Pts
HD
Excellent scholarly approach to the presentation using appropriate methods and skills in line with APA 7th Ed style. Consistent and accurate use of grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling with no e
ors, demonstrating a fluent professional/ academic writing style within the word limit. In-text citations and references are accurate, with no e
ors or unsupported claims, using the APA 7th Ed referencing system.
    4.2 to >4.0 Pts
D
A very good scholarly approach to the presentation using appropriate methods and skills in line with APA 7th Ed style with minimal e
ors or omissions. Grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling are consistent with minimal e
ors and minor revision required, demonstrating a professional/ academic writing style within the word limit. Minor e
ors in in-text citations and references with some unsupported claims, using the APA 7th Ed referencing system.
    4 to >3.2 Pts
CR
A good scholarly approach to the presentation that mostly reflects the use of appropriate methods and skills in line with APA 7th Ed style with multiple e
ors or omissions. Multiple e
ors in grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling with limited editing and revision required. Adheres to the word limit. Multiple e
ors in APA 7th Ed in-text citation and referencing style and unsupported claims evident.
    3.2 to >2.5 Pts
P
Adequate scholarly approach to the presentation that somewhat reflects the use of appropriate methods and skills in line with APA 7th Ed style, with significant e
ors or omissions. Significant e
ors in grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling with some editing and significant revision required. Meaning apparent, but language not always fluent. Below or above set word count limit. Significant e
ors in APA 7th Ed in-text citation and referencing style and unsupported claims.
    2.5 to >0 Pts
NX
Unsatisfactory presentation with minimal to no scholarly approach that does not reflect the use of appropriate methods and skills in line with APA 7th Ed style, with significant e
ors or omissions. Minimal to no demonstration of consistent and accurate use of grammar, syntax, punctuation, that detracts significantly from the clarity of the writing so that ideas and understanding cannot be communicated clearly to the reader. Thorough editing and revision are required. Well below or above the word count limit. Inco
ect application of APA 7th Ed referencing style resulting in inadequate acknowledgement of sources and risk of
eaching academic integrity/plagiarism.
    5 pts
    Total points: 40