Thus far, you have learned how historical contexts, perspectives, and biases influence the interpretation and "telling" of historical na
atives. For this discussion, reflect on what you have learned about your research question and the historical event and cu
ent event you chose. To ensure an interesting discussion, you are encouraged to think creatively about your initial posts and extend the points made by your peers. It is also important to review the module resources and read the prompts in their entirety before participating in the discussion. You should include examples and other supporting evidence from the module resources in your posts.
Discussing challenges that face our world often means investigating opinions and ideas different from your own. Remember to remain thoughtful and respectful towards your peers and instructor in your discussion post and replies.
Create one initial post and follow up with at least two response posts.
For your initial post, address the following:
1. Discuss the
ainstorming process you used to identify bias in your primary and secondary sources. How did you do it? Describe the strategies that were successful for you.
2. Consider the challenges you encountered identifying the na
atives about your historical event. What methods did you use to identify the absent voices in the historical na
atives?
3. What perspectives do you think are missing from the na
ative about your historical event?
Be sure to cite evidence from your sources to justify your points.
For your response posts, address the following:
1. How might you use your peers' strategies to uncover another absent perspective related to your historical event or expose a historical na
ative bias? If you think you cannot apply your peers' strategies to your own event or na
ative, explain why.
Remember, this assignment is graded on the quality of your initial post and at least two response posts to your classmates. If you refer to any module resources, be sure to include an attribution (or citation) for the resource.