In this essay, you will reflect on the causes and consequences of prejudice, and apply the theories and strategies of conflict resolution to a fictional situation.
· Respond to the following statement:
“All those women on welfare have it made. All they do is stay home and make babies while the rest of us have to work and pay taxes to support them.”
· Reflect on this statement in the context of what we have learned about prejudice. This should not just be writing down your first reaction or what you already know. Reflection involves critical thinking, which means rethinking your existing knowledge and previously held opinions in light of what we have learned about prejudice.
· Propose strategies that could resolve this particular prejudice.
· Your essay should be 1-2 pages in length, and Times New Roman font 12.
· Remember to use appropriate formatting as per APA (6th ed.): https:
owl.english.purdue.edu/owl
esource/560/01
Ru
ic Detail
A ru
ic lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a ru
ic to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the ru
ic's layout.
Content
Top of Form
Name: PHIL 350 Week 1 Assignment Ru
ic
· Grid View
· List View
Accomplished
Satisfactory
Approaches Expectations
Does Not Meet Expectations
Topic/Content
Points Range:31.5 (31.50%) - 35 (35.00%)
The paper includes all of the required content components: outlining how you would respond to Mr. Dawson, identifying the ethical issues in the Dr. Jolly/Mr. Dawson situation, addressing how you would hypothetically advise Dr. Jolly, and deciding what decision-making approach you would utilize.
Points Range:25.55 (25.55%) - 31.15 (31.15%)
The paper includes all of the required content components, but it may be missing a few details, or it does not fully explain each required component.
Points Range:21 (21.00%) - 25.2 (25.20%)
The paper includes most of the required content components, but it is missing many key details and examples to show a full understanding of each.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 20.65 (20.65%)
The paper is lacking most of the required components.
Supporting Evidence
Points Range:31.5 (31.50%) - 35 (35.00%)
Two or more appropriate sources are integrated throughout the paper. Sources are highly relevant to the topic and add greatly to the development of the research. Detailed, meaningful quotations and/or paraphrases aptly and accurately support the topic.
Points Range:25.55 (25.55%) - 31.15 (31.15%)
Two or more appropriate sources are used. Sources are mostly relevant to the topic, but some may be slightly less relevant to the development of the research.
Points Range:21 (21.00%) - 25.2 (25.20%)
The paper severely lacks supporting evidence. One or no appropriate sources are used. Sources are not relevant to the topic. Sources may not be credible.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 20.65 (20.65%)
The paper lacks research and credible support. No references are used, or they are highly i
elevant.
APA Style
Points Range:13.5 (13.50%) - 15 (15.00%)
Uses APA Style accurately and consistently to cite sources with only 1–2 e
ors. Sources are expertly cited and are peer-reviewed, relevant sources. Meets all formatting requirements (length and style) of the assignment.
Points Range:10.95 (10.95%) - 13.35 (13.35%)
Uses APA Style with minor citation violations with 3–4 e
ors. Sources are somewhat relevant, but may be limited in scholarly nature. Meets most formatting requirements (length and style) of the assignment.
Points Range:9 (9.00%) - 10.8 (10.80%)
Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA Style with 5–6 e
ors. Sources are not cited, or there are many e
ors. Sources are not scholarly in nature. Meets most formatting requirements (length and style) of the assignment.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 8.85 (8.85%)
Does not use APA Style, or there are pervasive e
ors throughout the paper. Does not meet the formatting requirements (length and style) of the assignment.
Mechanics
Points Range:13.5 (13.50%) - 15 (15.00%)
The writing demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and co
ectness; includes thorough details and information; and is extremely well organized. Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are all co
ect. There are minimal to no e
ors.
Points Range:10.95 (10.95%) - 13.35 (13.35%)
The writing is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness, sufficient details are included, and it is well organized, but it may contain a few e
ors. Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are generally co
ect with not many e
ors.
Points Range:9 (9.00%) - 10.8 (10.80%)
The writing lacks clarity or conciseness, contains numerous e
ors, and lacks organization. E
ors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the paper.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 8.85 (8.85%)
The writing is unfocused, rambling, or contains serious e
ors; lacks detail, relevant data, and information; and is poorly organized. There are many distracting e
ors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization.
Name:PHIL 350 Week 1 Assignment Ru
ic
Exit