The objective of this assignment is to enable
you to demonstrate your understanding of factors that...

Question

The objective of this assignment is to enable
you to demonstrate your understanding of factors that should be considered in policy
development to ensure that legal requirements are met and that best practices
in management are applied to court management, specifically. Write an essay of
5 pages in which you consider the following questions: 
·
How does a court system cope with a “changing of the guard” when a
new administration is elected and key executives and managers are replaced,
and/or when policy changes direction as a new political party assumes power? 
·
How does a new legal interpretation resulting from a court’s
decision on an existing law related to court procedures, and how does the
passage of a new law affect court administration? 
·
What kinds of management best practices would you, as a court
administrator, implement to ensure appropriate levels of continuity,
efficiency, effectiveness, and fairness when significant changes occur that
impact the court system? 
Your response to these questions should focus on
either the federal courts or a state court system of your choosing to limit the
scope of your essay.
YOUR ASSIGNMENT MUST BE IN APA FORMAT YOU MUST HAVE 6
REFERENCES YOU MUST HAVE CONCLUSION

David · Accepted Answer

Question: How does a court system cope with a “changing of the guard” when a new 
administration is elected and key executives and managers are replaced, and/or when 
policy changes direction as a new political party assumes power? 
 The court system has to cope up with the change of guard with the change in 
administration of the state or the country. This includes replacing of key executive and 
administrative positions which could certainly lead to the mismatch in the policies, 
rules, distribution of power and the way justice is delivered. This could also lead to 
mounting up of extra amount of pressure on the judges. However, the country system is 
based on laws and these needs to be enacted in a similar way despite of “changing of 
the guard” whenever a new government or administration is selected.  
The supporters of the strong federal government had thought that the judicial 
branch should have been comprised of the Supreme Court along with the lower end 
courts that are established over the time period. The issue with this kind of thinking 
had been that the Article III of the nation’s Constitution was very unclear on what 
exactly the judicial authority needs to consist of. The methodology in which this was 
fixed had to combine on the laws as well as the justice into one of the court system 
which had provided a more effective, efficient as well as highly organized way of 
acquitting out justice (Patriot, 2005). 
The dispute and issues in the parliament had highly focused on how the 
authority and power of the United States Constitution had moved from the states 
towards the federal government of the nation. The States' rights champions had always 
fought this since they had felt that the new courts should have a immense and great 
deal of power. The supporters of the federal government had highly disagreed that only 
the powerful federal court system would be liable to conquer all the flaws that had be 
clear throughout the Confederation era (Perkel, 2008). The champions had then claimed 
that each of the states would have an entitlement towards abolishing any of the national 
law.  
Question2: How does a new legal interpretation resulting from a court’s decision on 
an existing law related to court procedures, and how does the passage of a new law 
affect court administration?  
Looking back to the era,

The objective of this assignment is to enable you to demonstrate your understanding of factors that should be considered in policy development to ensure that legal requirements are met and that best...

Solution

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

Submit New Assignment