Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

The goal of this paper is to construct a fair-minded, unbiased, analytical analysis of a topic in a comprehensive essay. This is not an opinion piece or a persuasive essay that simply aims to prove or...

1 answer below »
  • The goal of this paper is to construct a fair-minded, unbiased, analytical analysis of a topic in a comprehensive essay.
  • This is not an opinion piece or a persuasive essaythat simply aims to prove or reinforce what you already believe. This would be confirmation bias, and bias must be avoided in this project.
  • You must identify and define rhetorical devices and logical fallacies on both sides of the argument. Be sure you indicate which specific rhetorical device and fallacy you have found, and there is evidence in your sources of these course concepts in practice that is cited in your paper.
  • You will present statements and claims for analyzingbothsides of the topic. Only then should you state you own conclusion as an objective, critical thinker given the information presented.
    • Topic: Climate change is the greatest threat facing humanity today.
    • Essay Format:Your essay must be 7 pages, 7–9 paragraphs(1600–1900 words) in length. The abstract, title page, and reference list donotcount in the page or word count.
    • Times New Roman
    • 12-point
    • Double-spaced
    • 1-inch margins
    • Proper Level I and Level II APA section headings for all major sections of the essay
    • All other applicable APA formatting

    • Required Elements:

      • A properly formatted APA abstract
      • Body of the paper
    • A properly formatted APA title page

    • Introduction: Identify the issue. Provide the necessary background and/or important recent developments. Define key terms and concepts. Engage the reader and explain the broader significance of the issue.
    • Arguments and Counterarguments: Summarize the best arguments on both sides of the issue. Include relevant research from credible sources used to support each conclusion. Devote at least one paragraph to each side.
    • Evaluation of Critical Thinking: Assess the strength of the arguments and the quality of thinking surrounding this issue.
      • Identify weaknesses in critical thinking such asfallacies, rhetorical devices, vague language, and cognitive biases. Provide specific examples of how these weaknesses appear in arguments you encountered, using terminology and definitions from the course. Be specific! Present evidence from your sources that show these fallacies/biases being used.
      • Evaluate the quality of scientific and anecdotal evidence using the standards ofinductive and deductive reasoningdescribed in the course. Consider the quality of causal relationship, analogies, generalizations, and/or moral reasoning.
    • Conclusion: Analyze the totality of research and offer a critical thinker’s response to the issue. Identify your own position and experience with the issue and explain how your thinking of the subject has evolved as a result of your analysis. Your conclusion does not have to be absolute, but it should not be equivocal. If both sides have good arguments, which is better, even if only slightly better, and what is the argument that tips the scales in the sides’ favor? Why does that point tip the scales?
  • A properly formatted APA reference list
    • Sources should appear in alphabetical order according to the last name of the first author listed on the source.
    • If there is no author(s), then the source should be cited by title or organization.

Sources and Research Sources:You must use five scholarly or academic sources and all research should be published within the last five years. Sources not scholarly or academic in nature may affect your grade.

Answered Same Day Nov 30, 2021

Solution

Dr. Vidhya answered on Dec 04 2021
154 Votes
Running Head: CLIMATE CHANGE        1
CLIMATE CHANGE         2
CLIMATE CHANGE IS THE GREATEST THREAT FACING HUMANITY TODAY
Table of Contents
Abstract    3
Introduction    4
Climate Change: The Onset of Issue    4
The Transitional Crossroad    7
Nuclear War and Holocaust: Close Confronts to Climate Change    8
Rebuttal of the Counterargument    9
Conclusion    9
References    11
Abstract
Climate change is seen as the biggest threat to human kind because the health of the planet earth is changing at a rapid pace. The following is an argumentative analysis of seeing how the climate change is working as the biggest threat to human kind in the light of the history of its origin and how it expanded over the past few decades.
Introduction
The idealized state of human living has been challenged by many aspects in the modern context; some of them are driven from the nature itself, however, a majority of ba
iers, which hinders the achievement of progressive society, is relatable to the human actions. Changes in climate and the way, the behavior of the planet earth, are deviating, has become one of the most prominent concerns among the environmentalists (Bongaarts & O'Neill, 2018).
The growth of human beings and changes in climate are inte
elated factors; in the name of progressing, human has begun playing with nature, distu
ing the ecological structure, violating the boundaries set for the public domain of progress and so on. There can be as many reasons as possible that can justify that the climate change is the greatest threat to the humanity.
Climate Change: The Onset of Issue
At first, it is important to note here that the climate change is not subjected to the issue of change only; it is in the perception of people about the problems that they have increased for themselves in the form of climate change. In fact, the global warming at mean rate of 1.2 degree Celsius every year is one of the alarming points that people should understand (Briggs, Kennel & Victor, 2015). Contrary to this concern shown by the scientists and the lovers of environments, people do not tend to focus on the changes they are likely to view in the atmosphere. They are more as if ‘adjusting’ to the so-called ‘new normal’ conditions of living, which is ironical and subject of criticism.
The above can be understood by the fact of rising temperature of earth. Due to this increase, several unexpected things have already begun to happen; the glaciers are melting, causing the sea level rising every year, the earth overshoot day is getting closer than the previous one, which implies that that the changes will be more affecting to the international population. There will be global shortage of purified water one day or other, which people need to understand, but actually, they do not. They simply tend to divert their attention from the problem and begin seeing the larger picture of growth, which the humans have achieved over the course of years.
In the light of this fact, which is bitter and somehow indigestible, it is not exaggerated statement that the climate change is a small term to be used to project the catastrophic changes to the planet earth and its natural resources. The term climate
eakdown somehow defines it well because, now, the climate is simply
eaking down and in one way or other. It will be soon shutting down with all its services closed to human beings (Griscom et al., 2017). Moreover, to all people in the world, this
eakdown is one of the most significant things to think and act upon.
A handful of scientists during the nineteenth century found out how the earth was warmed by fossil fuel pollution. In the future, these early climate scientists were not alarmed by anything so comfortable; some even thought it would be a positive thing to have a warmer Planet. Fossil fuel has become more closely connected to the economy and everyday life over the past decade, from transportation to building to development to food. Spectacular rises in income, mobility, usage, technology and medicine have been powered by fossil fuel infusion.
The Green Revolution in agriculture was driven by it and exponential growth in food eventually led to exponential population growth. Literally, human society today operates on fossil fuels. People are addicted to things and they cannot even try to imagine a world without them (Shindell et al., 2017). Specifically, one should try to imagine an army willingly losing the battle that could have been won easily by following the rules of living in harmony with nature. The devil, though, will have its due....
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here