Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

The BusinessSchool TAXATION Law & Practice Assignment Assignment Part 1 Schubert, Mahler and Tull are resident Australian seamen employed on the fishing trawler MV St Cecilia. Whilst on a routine...

1 answer below »
The BusinessSchool TAXATION Law & Practice Assignment Assignment Part 1 Schubert, Mahler and Tull are resident Australian seamen employed on the fishing trawler MV St Cecilia. Whilst on a routine fishing operation the captain of St Ceciliaheard a radio message thatSS Titan, an abandoned oil tankerabout 20 nautical miles to the south was drifting towards the Australian coast. The vessel was badly holed, leaking oil and with present currents and tidal situations it was drifting towards a coral reef a short distance from a stretch of environmentally sensitive coastline. If the tanker wrecked on the reef the environmental and economic consequences would be enormous. The captain sailed to the reported position of the stricken tanker. In the rough sea, the crew were unsuccessful in their attempt to attach a tow line. The captain then called for volunteers prepared to risk their lives in boarding the vessel and securing a tow line manually. Schubert and Mahler had previously worked on a salvage vessel and had some experience in operations of this type and they volunteered immediately. They displayed considerable bravery in swimming through rough seas, boarded the tanker and fixed a line. The heroic feat was recorded on video by Tull. Once the line was secure, St Ceciliatowed the tankeraway from the coastline and it was subsequently salvaged by the tug, Resurrection. Both Schubert and Mahler were awarded an Order of Australia medal by the Australian Government and $100,000 each from Lloyds of London, the insurer of SS Titan,who had been saved a billion dollar payout. In addition, Mahler entered into a contract to write an article for a magazine. He was paid $20,000 and an additional $10,000 for signing an agreement not to give interviews on television or to journalists. Schubert was offered $10,000 for his OA medal. He was in poor health at the time and required medical treatment so accepted the payment. Tull sold the video to Channel 9 for $8,000 and it was shown exclusively on that station throughout Australia. Later that year he was paid $50,000 to travel to the USA to provide technical advice on a proposed telemovie of the event tentatively entitled ‘Aqualung’. He plans to stay in the US indefinitely and pursue other filmmaking opportunities. Required 1 [Approximately 40% of marks] (a) Explain what is meant by ‘income by ordinary concepts’. (b) Advise what tax consequences arise in respect of the payments to Mahler, Schubert and Tull. You must refer to appropriate case law and applicable sections of the Income Tax Acts. Part 2 Ruby Engineering Pty Ltd [Ruby] was incorporated in 1990 and produced engine components used in the Australian car industry. In 2008 the business and company assets were sold to Diamond Ltd. Under the terms of the agreement, Ruby remained liable for any claims arising before 2008. The company used the funds to invest in real estate and shares. During the year ended 30 June 2013 Ruby incurred the following expenses: (a) Ruby has owned and rented a residential property since 2008. Rental income for the current year is $15,000. During the year the company replaced the old kitchen fittings, including cupboards that had deteriorated through water damage and wear and tear. The new cupboards were of the same type as the old ones and the kitchen layout was not altered substantially. The cost was $6, XXXXXXXXXXb) In another of the rental properties a visitor to the tenants slipped on the steps and sustained injuries requiring medical attention. She claims one of the steps was loose and commenced legal proceedings against Ruby alleging her injuries were caused by the poor condition of the building. Ruby incurred legal expenses of $4,000 and the action has not been settled at 30 June. (c) In 2006 Ruby sold a batch of parts that were subsequently found to be defective. The buyer, an Australian car manufacturer lodged a claim for damages in the Federal Court. The claim was settled in November 2012 and Ruby paid $750,000 to the manufacturer. (d) The directors of Ruby were concerned about the claim in (c) and the effect it had on the year’s reported profit. They resolved to set aside a small amount of funds annually to meet any future claims. Accordingly, an amount of $100,000 was set aside in a provision in the accounts for the year ended 30 June. (e) In August 2012 Ruby decided to investigate the possibility of re-entering the car parts manufacturing industry using a new type of alloy. An amount of $120,000 was paid to consultants investigating the proposal but the directors decided not to proceed at this time because the project did not appear commercially viable. Required 2. [Approximately 60% of marks] Advise the directors of Ruby Pty Ltd of the tax deductibility of the above amounts. You must make reference to appropriate authorities and legislation XXXXXXXXXXCHECKLIST TO BE ATTACHED TO ASSIGNMENT Submitted an assignment that is your own work. (You may discuss the essay topics with others but you cannot copy another’s work, give your work to someone else to copy, or work closely with another student on how to structure or write the essay.) ? The assignment is no more than 2000 words long (excluding abstract, references, bibliography). ? Read and tried to address the criteria in the Course Description. ? Read and addressed the issues raised in the University’s Presentation of Academic Work ? Read Regulation 6.1.1, Plagiarism and asked questions if you are unsure about what it means. ? Referenced direct quotes (use quotation marks or indent) AND summarising from another person’s work in the body of the essay. (This includes internet sources). ? Indicated what referencing style you have chosen Harvard/APA and USED IT. ? Answered all parts to the question. ? Used headings (even though this is not a report, headings are encouraged to assist structure and flow). ? Proof read the assignment for spelling, punctuation and grammar errors. ? Where required, used relevant sections of legislation, legal rules/principles ? Where required, used cases to support your points or arguments. These cases can be obtained from textbooks, or the CCH online libraries, articles found via AGIS PLUS TEXT database etc. ? Put case citations in the body of the work as well as listing the case in the List of References. ? Discussed the issues as required and put arguments and gave your view. ? Used a range of resources. ? Included a title page with your name, student number, course code and name and lecturer’s name. ? Have a margin so comments can be added; put page numbers and your name and student number on each page. INSTRUCTIONS 1. See the Instructions and Assessment Criteria in theCourse Description and make sure you follow them! 2. Please answer all parts of the question 3. Attached to this document is a Checklist to be filled in by you and attached to your essay/assignment. Read this now before you start your research. If you have followed this checklist, there is a good chance you will do well XXXXXXXXXXAll work presented for assessment in this course must comply with the format outlined in the University's Presentation of Academic Work publication, available from the bookshop or on-line at 5. All essays must be accompanied by a signed official cover sheet ('Plagiarism Declaration Form'), available at www.ballarat.edu.au/ard/business/student_info_webct.shtml and lodged as appropriate for your campus XXXXXXXXXXYou MUST reference in the body of the essay every time you use information from other people. This requires you to keep a track of where you are taking information from and then writing the reference up. You should use the APA style; and use the University’s new Presentation of Academic Work. The Library’s website also has a citation style guide site. If you plagiarise (intentionally OR unintentionally) you will be given zero: see Regulation 6.1.1 for more details XXXXXXXXXXDUE DATE: … Please check with the Course Description for details of where and when to submit your assignment. If you need an extension you must ask for one BEFORE the due date (unless this is impossible XXXXXXXXXXThe assignment should not exceed approximately 2000 words XXXXXXXXXXThe assignment is worth 25%.
Answered Same Day Dec 23, 2021

Solution

Robert answered on Dec 23 2021
129 Votes
Australian Income tax
2013

Name of the Institute

Name of the Student

AUSTRALIAN INCOME TAX
The present paper is on the Australian Tax Regime and covers individual cases explaining
important terms and defining the taxation impact on certain transactions.
Australian Laws
In this assignment we will be keeping in mind the laws and tax of Australia.
Let us have an understanding of the Australian Laws and the income tax system in
Australia before defining the cases.
Income Tax in Australia –
Like in any country income tax in Australia is the most important form of
evenue in the Australian Tax System. Income tax is levied upon mainly on three
sources:
1. Individual tax payer (salary and wages)
2. Business incomes (incomes form any business) and
3. Capital Gains (profits from assets etc.)
It is about more than 66% of the revenue for the federal government and 57%
of the revenue for other three tiers of government.
Tax system is such that the incomes which are derived by an individual is
taxed according to a progressive slap which tends to change every year, the incomes
from business are taxed at flat 30%. Talking about capital gain which we will be
discussing more about in the case also are the gains which are taxed as and when
ealised. Income tax officers collect the taxes in behalf of the Government of
Australia.
A financial year in Australia is considered from 1
st
July to 30
th
June, taxable
incomes is calculated after deductions, and claims and capital gains and everything
then a taxable income is determined.
Discussing the cases:
Case 1 – Case of the Vessel
Part-A
This case talks about three people namely Schubert, Tull and Mahler who put
there life‟s and boarded a vessel which was about to sink and saved it from drowning.
Tull recorded the entire thing on his camera and the other to swim across to do so.
The vessel was of the company Titan, on this act the company and the government of
Australia awarded the two heroes‟ and there were agreements with Tull about the
videos to be showcased. We shall discuss about these awards as how are they to be
dealt in the eyes of Income tax of the government of Australia.
The government of Australia gave a medal to Schubert and Mahler and the insurer
company of Titan gave them $100,000 each. Tull sold the video for $8000 and Mahler
was given $30000 for not giving interviews anywhere on television.
Part A – Income by ordinary concepts
There are is no specific definition of any explanation to the concept of income
from ordinary sources. It‟s a vague concept in the eyes of law or income tax. It has
een discussed in many cases and arguments but there have always been different in
different ways and different situations. An assembled income of any individual or
usiness or entity is described as income from ordinary concept. These incomes could
e derived directly or indirectly from any of the sources. It may also include the
incomes within the country or incomes received from other countries except
Australia. Sections 10-5 give the provisions which talk about controlling or general
treatment of the ordinary income.
Income tax assessment act of 1997 is the act which talks about and covers all
possible means of ordinary or assembled income in section 6-5(1), but none other than
this the concept of ordinary income is defined.
Components of Ordinary income are –
Personal exertion income (Salary)
Property Income (rent, dividends)
Business income (Sales, farming)
There are amendments which are done on regular basis in the ITAA act which
judges or confines the assembled income through provisions in regards to every case
of judgment that is passed on a particular case just as to explain the receipt of money
and how it to be dealt in the eyes of law?
The case of Scott v commissioner of taxation in the year 1935 was a dispute
which had different arguments and
ought to judgement which never exists in the
ooks of law. The case stated the word „ordinary income‟ follows a judicial definition
in regards to income. There is not science or art or any principles that are to be
applied in order to certain the receipts as income. It is determined as upon the usage of
the receipt by the owner of the money. Section 6.1 of the taxation states that
“assembled income” includes ordinary income and could also include other statutory
incomes.
A periodic, regular or recu
ing receipt are characterised as incomes in the
normal terms and dictionary. Courts draw a totally different aspect regarding the same
etween income receipt and capital receipt, income receipt is something that does not
include capital receipt.
Principles of incomes and receipts in regards to the amendments and High
court judgments:
 An income is ordinary or not depends on the hands of recipient. The amount of
income in the hands...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here