The Aged Care Royal Commission XXXXXXXXXXfound evidence of substandard care. Students are required to read The Aged Care Royal Commission report summary...

The Aged Care Royal Commission XXXXXXXXXXfound evidence of substandard care. Students are required to read The Aged Care Royal Commission report summary (https:
agedcare.royalcommission.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-03/final-report-executive-summary.pdf (Links to an external site.)), discuss a patient safety issue identified, suggest risk frameworks that could promote better outcomes in relation to the clinical issue identified and reflect on their learning.
 
Part 1
Students are required to identify a patient safety issue raised in the Aged Care Royal Commission XXXXXXXXXXin relation to substandard care and explore the issue in a discussion board post on the 10193 Clinical Governance Canvas site. Students are required to define the safety issue and discuss the negative impacts for the affected person/family, health care workers and health care facility, providing evidence and statistics. Students will also make recommendations about evidence informed risk management frameworks that could be used to promote improved outcomes in relation to the patient safety issue identified. The post will include a APA7th edition formatted reference list, and be 500 words (including intext references, not including reference list).
 
Part 2
Students are required to respond to a peer’s Aged Care Royal Commission substandard care discussion  post with a written reflection on what you have learned and how this insight connects with your experience (Word count: Maximum 500 words).
 
Other requirements:
Any resources utilised should be referenced with a Reference list provided at the end of the discussion post.
As with all academic assessments, students are required to comply with the University's policy and procedure for assessment items, inclusive of ensuring academic integrity of their work. All work must be the students original work. Any suspicions of academic misconduct will be refe
ed to the ADE as per university policy.
 
This Assessment addresses the following Unit Learning Outcomes: 
1.Examine the critical role of nursing in clinical governance; 
4.Discuss and describe the use of risk frameworks to aid identification and amelioration of clinical risk; 
6.Critically analyse the role of nurses in advocating for improved patient outcomes. 
 
and related graduate attributes include: 
1. UC graduates are professional. UC graduates can: 
1.1 employ up-to-date and relevant knowledge and skills; 
1.2 communicate effectively; 
1.3 use creativity, critical thinking, analysis and research skills to solve theoretical and real-world problems;
1.5 display initiative and drive, and use their organisation skills to plan and manage their workload;
1.6 take pride in their professional and personal integrity;
 
2. UC graduates are global citizens. UC graduates can: 
2.1 think globally about issues in their profession; 
2.5 make creative use of technology in their learning and professional lives; 
 
3. UC graduates are lifelong learners. UC graduates can: 
3.1 reflect on their own practice, updating and adapting their knowledge and skills for continual professional and academic development; and 
3.4 evaluate and adopt new technology. 
Ru
ic
Clinical Governance Assignment 2: Discussion Board Post and Reflection
    Clinical Governance Assignment 2: Discussion Board Post and Reflection
    Criteria
    Ratings
    Pts
    This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeIdentification of a patient safety issue
Identification of a patient safety issue raised in the Aged Care Royal Commission XXXXXXXXXXin relation to substandard care
        5 Pts
Excellent
Excellent articulation of identified patient safety issue raised in the Aged Care Royal Commission XXXXXXXXXXin relation to substandard care
    3.75 Pts
Very good
Very good articulation of identified patient safety issue raised in the Aged Care Royal Commission XXXXXXXXXXin relation to substandard care
    3.25 Pts
Good
Good articulation of identified patient safety issue raised in the Aged Care Royal Commission XXXXXXXXXXin relation to substandard care
    2.5 Pts
Satisfactory
Satisfactory articulation of identified patient safety issue raised in the Aged Care Royal Commission XXXXXXXXXXin relation to substandard care
    0 Pts
Unsatisfactory:
Does not adequately articulate a patient safety issue raised in the Aged Care Royal Commission XXXXXXXXXXin relation to substandard care
    5 pts
    This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeSafety issue discussed
Safety issue discussed including the negative impacts for the client, health care workers and health care facility; providing evidence and statistics.
        10 Pts
Excellent
Excellent discussion in relation to the safety issue identified including the negative impacts for the client, health care workers and health care facility with evidence and statistics provided
    7.5 Pts
Very good
Very good discussion in relation to the safety issue identified including the negative impacts for the client, health care workers and health care facility with evidence and statistics provided
    6.5 Pts
Good
Good discussion in relation to the safety issue identified including the negative impacts for the client, health care workers and health care facility with evidence and statistics provided
    5 Pts
Adequate
Adequate discussion in relation to the safety issue identified including the negative impacts for the client, health care workers and health care facility with evidence and statistics provided
    0 Pts
Unsatisfactory
Does not adequately discuss the safety issue identified and / or the negative impacts for the client, health care workers and health care facility, and / or no evidence / statistics provided
    10 pts
    This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeIdentification of risk frameworks
Identification of risk frameworks that can be used to promote better outcomes in relation to the clinical issue identified
        10 Pts
Excellent
Excellent identification of risk frameworks that can be used to promote better outcomes in relation to the clinical issue identified
    7.5 Pts
Very good
Very good identification of risk frameworks that can be used to promote better outcomes in relation to the clinical issue identified
    6.5 Pts
Good
Good identification of risk frameworks that can be used to promote better outcomes in relation to the clinical issue identified
    5 Pts
Adequate
Adequate identification of risk frameworks that can be used to promote better outcomes in relation to the clinical issue identified
    0 Pts
Unsatisfactory
Does not identify risk frameworks that could be used to promote better outcomes in relation to the clinical issue identified
    10 pts
    This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeWritten reflection
Written reflection response to a peer’s Aged Care Royal Commission substandard care discussion post
        10 Pts
Excellent
Excellent written reflection response to a peer’s Aged Care Royal Commission substandard care discussion post
    7.5 Pts
Very good
Very good written reflection response to a peer’s Aged Care Royal Commission substandard care discussion post
    6.5 Pts
Good
Good written reflection response to a peer’s Aged Care Royal Commission substandard care discussion post
    5 Pts
Adequate
Adequate written reflection response to a peer’s Aged Care Royal Commission substandard care discussion post
    0 Pts
Unsatisfactory
Does not provide a written reflection response to a peer’s Aged Care Royal Commission substandard care discussion post or not well articulated / developed.
    10 pts
    This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeWriting / Word count and referencing:
Resources cited and referenced with co
ect APA referencing style. Word limit adhered to; Co
ect grammar, spelling, punctuation and syntax
        10 Pts
Excellent
Relevant, contemporary and appropriate literature resourced and utilised with no e
ors in referencing, word limit adhered to, no writing e
ors
    7.5 Pts
Very good
Very good: Appropriate literature resourced and utilised with minor e
ors in referencing, word limit adhered to, minor writing e
ors
    6.5 Pts
Good
Appropriate literature resourced and utilised with some e
ors in referencing, word limit adhered to; some writing e
ors
    5 Pts
Adequate
Literature resourced and utilised but many e
ors e
ors in referencing, word limit adhered to; many writing e
ors
    0 Pts
Unsatisfactory
Little or no literature resourced and / Inco
ect referencing style. / word count no adhered to / inappropriate language used.
    10 pts
    Total points: 45