Question 1 | High Distinction | Distinction | Credit | Pass |
|
Ability to find and describe an accounting issue. Inclusion of item of accounting news. (SLO4) | Copy of item included (1 mark) | A link to article is provided (0.5 marks) | 1 |
Description of major issues in article. (SLO4) | Description with in depth discussion and identification of all the key issues. | Clear identification and discussion of all key issues. | Clear coverage of most of the key issues in the article. | Summary provided, with one or two issues identified, but there may be other issues that could have been addressed that have been overlooked. | 2 |
Linkage of major issues in article to one or more topics presented in the subject. (SLO4) | Response identifies a range of relevant topics and theories and is able to deconstruct and evaluate the issues through the use of theories and arrive at a logical position, for example by synthesizing the insights of different theories. | Response identifies a range of relevant topics and theories and is able to evaluate the issue with a discussion of theory containing relevant examples. | Response uses theory to provide a clear explanation and analysis of most of the relevant issues in the article. | Response provides a linkage to the most obvious topic as well as a brief description of the linkage to some of the related accounting theories. | 3 |
Critical Capacity and use of source material:Has the student analysed the underlying assumptions and implications of the accounting theories or topics they have identified? Are the arguments supported? (SLO4) | Response critically evaluates the underlying assumptions and implications of the applied theories or topics. Exemplary use of relevant sources from within prescribed materials and attempts to include sources beyond prescribed material. | Response critically evaluates most of the assumptions in the applied theories or topics. Some may be evaluated with greater depth than others. Correctly refers to an extensive variety of sources to support arguments, including prescribed texts and a broad range of additional readings. | Response provides some critical evaluation of the theories or topics as a whole. Demonstrates use of multiple appropriate sources. | Response provides some summaries of the theories or topics and the underlying assumptions and implications. Limited but appropriate source consultation and background reading. | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Question 2 | High Distinction | Distinction | Credit | Pass |
|
Ability to find comment letters, Inclusion of copies of comment letters. (SLO4) | Copy of comment letters included (1 mark) | Links to comment letters is provided (0.5 marks) | 1 |
Outline of major issues covered in the exposure draft. (SLO4) | Thorough identification and elaboration of all the key issues. | Indepth identification and elaboration of key issues in the exposure draft. | Clear identification and some elaboration on most of the key issues | One or two issues identified, but with various other issues overlooked with only basic elaboration. | 1 |
Description of issues where there is agreement/disagreement between the parties who have written comment letters. (SLO4) | All of the key areas of conjecture are described in depth and this is supported by evidence from comment letters. | All of the key areas of conjecture are described in depth | Most of the areas of conjecture are described. | The most obvious area of conjecture is briefly described. | 1 |
Assessment as to whether the authors of the comments letters are utilising the arguments 'for' or 'against' regulation in their views. (SLO4) | Response identifies a range of appropriate examples of comments letters are thoroughly justified as being for or against the existence of accounting regulation. | Response identifies several examples of comments letters which are appropriately justified as being for or against the existence of accounting regulation. | Response identifies some appropriate examples of comments letters which are adequately justified as being for or against the existence of accounting regulation. | Response identifies one or two examples of comments letters with limited justification as to whether they are for or against the existence of regulation. | 1.5 |
Application of each of the theories of regulation (public interest, private interest and capture) to the comments letters and a justification as to which theory best explains the comments. (SLO4). | Response clearly applies all of the theories to the various issues in the comment letters and provides a well developed justification that critically evaluates the relevance of the theories to the issue. | Response applies all of the theories to the various issues, and provides a clear justification for the chosen theories. | Response applies most of the theories to various issues in the comment letters and provides a clear justification for the chosen theory/theories. | Response briefly applies some of the theories to one issue in the comment letters and provides a basic justification for the most obvious theory. | 2.5 |
Critical Capacity: Has the student deeply analysed the underlying assumptions of the accounting theories and perspectives utilised in their response? (SLO4) | Response critically evaluates all the underlying assumptions of the theories and perspectives of regulation. Exemplary use of relevant sources from within prescribed materials and attempts to include sources beyond prescribed material. | Response critically evaluates most of the underlying assumptions of the theories and perspectives of regulation. Correctly refers to an extensive variety of sources to support arguments, including prescribed texts and additional readings. | Response provides some critical evaluation of the theories and perspectives of regulation as a whole. Demonstrates use of multiple appropriate sources. | Response provides some summaries of the theories and perspectives of regulation and the underlying assumptions. Limited but appropriate source consultation and background reading. | 3 |
Academic Writing: Is the answer well written, easy to follow and understand? | Accurate use of syntax, spelling and punctuation. A sophisticated vocabulary is appropriately used. Answer is logically structured with arguments coherently developed and supported. | Accurate use of syntax, spelling and punctuation; succinct and effective use of vocabulary.Clear expression and structure. | Accurate use of syntax, vocabulary,spellingand punctuation. Writing is easy to follow and understand. | Mostly accurate syntax, spelling and punctuation, language is simplistic but appropriate. | 4 |
Adherence to referencing guidelines | Reference list included with correct adherence to referencing guidelines. Correct in-text referencing is provided. | Reference list and in-text referencing performed in accordance with APA guidelines. | Reference list and in-text referencing performed largely in accordance with the APA guidelines. | Reference list provided, formatted in APA style with minor errors. Some in-text referencing provided with minor errors | 2 |
|
|
|
|
| 25 |