Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT: The student will undertake a systematic critique of one research paper from a choice provided by the module leader. The student will discuss how this paper fits with current...

1 answer below »

SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT:

The student will undertake a systematic critique of one research paper from a choice provided

by the module leader. The student will discuss how this paper fits with current evidence.

The learning outcomes of this module will be assessed by the submission of an essay based on an appraisal of a published research article relevant to the Adult Nursing practice, using an appropriate critiquing tool to include a discussion of the relevance of the research to practice.

(3,000 words +/- 10%)

(Pass Mark 40%- see Module Site for Marking Criteria)

COURSEWORK SUBMISSION

Submission Route:

One electronic copy to be submitted via Moodle according to the guidance below:

Instruction to students on submitting assignments electronically

1. All assignments will be submitted electronically through Moodle.

3. The submitted assignment must have a footer which includes page numbers.

Please note your name must not be printed anywhere on the submission document.

When you submit your paper electronically you will have the opportunity to save a receipt.

Document Layout

· 2.0 line spacing

· Size 12 font Arial

· Page number as footer on all pages

You should not place your name on any part of the paper

Assignment Guidelines

Clear Introduction

o Provide a clear statement of intent and signpost the essay.

o Tell the reader what will be included in this essay and in what order.

o State why the topic is important to your field of nursing.

o Outline the importance of research in nursing, critiquing research and link to evidence based practice.

o Define key terms which are relevant to your essay – ensure the definitions are relevant to your essay content (e.g. if using quantitative research, ensure your definition relates to the type of studies and methodology you are discussing).

Body

o Critique the research paper using the framework issued by the module leader (see below) identifying strengths and limitations of the study in relation to believability and robustness:

Believability

o Writing style, author credentials, title, abstract

Robustness

o Research problem/purpose significance of study

o Literature review

o Study design/methods/philosophical underpinnings/theoretical framework/

aim/hypothesis

o Sampling

o Ethical considerations

o Data collection

o Data analysis

o Findings

In doing this you will be showing an understanding of the research process. Make sure that you support your discussion with relevant references, identifying any implications of the issues identified.

· Demonstrate that you have conducted an appropriate inspection of the literature related to this topic

· Summarise the significant findings, showing where this study fits in to the wider

evidence base on the topic. This will help you to demonstrate wider reading and should show that you have undertaken an inspection of the relevant literature.

Conclusion

· Conclude your essay by summarising what you have discussed throughout this essay in a logical order. Do not just repeat your introduction. Start this by giving an overall summary – what have you done – what have you shown, how is this relevant to current practice, where does this need to go from here?

Throughout, you need to demonstrate

· Evidence of original thought

· Succinct writing: keeping within the word limit (3000 words)

· Good presentation (see guidance below) with correct grammar and spelling

· Correct referencing –this should follow university guidelines:

https://my.lsbu.ac.uk/my/wcm/myconnect/c6be7b33-cfab-445e-a87c34aab23d4d0e/harvard-referencing-helpsheet.pdf?MOD=AJPERES

Critiquing framework

The use of one of the critiquing frameworks below is compulsory:

For quantitative research:

How to appraise quantitative research

Xabi Cathala Calvin Moorley

OR

Coughlan, M., Cronin, P., Ryan, F XXXXXXXXXXStep-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 1:

quantitative research. British Journal of Nursing, 16, 11, pp XXXXXXXXXX.

For qualitative research:

How to appraise qualitative research

Calvin Moorley Xabi Cathala

OR

Ryan, F., Coughlan, M., Cronin, P XXXXXXXXXXStep-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 2:qualitative research. British Journal of Nursing, 16, 12, pp XXXXXXXXXX.

You are reminded that London South Bank University has a policy on the late submission of work and on claiming extenuating circumstances. Specific details of these policies and others relating to assessment regulations can also be found in the Student Handbook.

Answered Same Day Jul 02, 2021

Solution

Tanaya answered on Jul 09 2021
177 Votes
SYSTEMATIC CRITIQUE OF RESEARCH PAPER
Table of Contents
Introduction    3
Critique of the Research Paper    3
Believability    3
Robustness    5
Research Problem and Significance    5
Literature Review    5
Study Design    7
Sampling    8
Ethical Considerations    9
Data Collection    10
Data Analysis    10
Findings    11
Conclusion    12
References    14
Introduction
There had been an increase in the number of falls that were observed among the elderly population that resulted in the maximum number of hospitalisation. The intent of the research articles is to identify the extensive presence of frailty syndrome among the older population and the extent the ba
iers can be overcome so that falls can be prevented.
The main goal of the study helps in the identification of opportunities and challenges that involves caring for the elderly population. The study identifies the various challenges that interfere with the integration in the care under the hospital settings with the increase in the awareness of services—the subject of research been a great concern according to the Public Health England 2018.
Around 30% of the elderly population beyond the age of 65 years experienced home fall, which by 2015 have increased to 50%. The study will have foremost relevance in improving the primary care of the older generation at their home and even within the hospital settings. The study has explored the various risk stratification and priorities related to the fall that contributed to the health improvement of the older population. The study will be ca
ying out qualitative research analysis while addressing different aspects related to the accident prevention of the older people in the nursing homes and care homes so that a person-centred co-ordinated approach can be created in the management of the healthcare.
Critique of the Research Pape
Believability
For any critical review of a journal, there are certain aspects that are concentrated to establish the authenticity and believability of the work. The process assists the readers in identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the research process that has been adopted by the researcher in achieving his objectives. To ca
y out this critical review Moorley and Cathala (2019) framework, have been adopted. The study has been ca
ied out and assembled by Suhail Amin Tarafdar, who is a general practitioner in West midland supported by other authors Alison Doyle, Nichola Pugh, De
ie Brown, Kathy lee and Julie Law who had been closely working with the Birmingham City Council Public Health, England. The authors have closely observed that there was a close relationship between frailty and occasional falls among the older population. As stated by the authors that there had been several investigations, which existed on identifying the ba
iers related to the falls, however, there were not but the research that was available in determining the perception of the primary healthcare for this older generation that has facilitated an increased number of falls.
The authors rather expressed the interest in exploring the possibility of the decrease in the incidence of fall among this frail population with adequate person-centred care with a place-based approach so that the health can be improved. The writing style that has been adopted by the authors is adequately supported by state evidence of the number of accidental falls that were met by the elderly population in U.K. (Carneiro et al. 2017). Further, the study has also been adequately supported by literature related to the concepts and approaches that were previously adopted by the healthcare professionals in identifying the ba
iers related to the falls. The author appropriately constructs the title of research that covers each of the aspects that have been covered in the study (Wang et al. 2016). The reader acquires a fair idea of the aspects that will be discussed in the study and the context on fall and the method of study that has been adopted in the study is even portrayed with clarity. The abstract of the study also provides an adequate
ief of the aspects that have been elaborated in the research.
Robustness
Research Problem and Significance
In the study, there had been three aspects, which have been covered as a part of the research objective. These three-research questions, which have been portrayed in the study, were based on which the qualitative research has been constructed. The main idea of the research questions was on the grounds of the research objective that included whether the fall and fracture prevention about the elderly population were priority within the same population (Wang et al. 2016). In addition, the objective of the research also includes evaluation of process the health care practitioner utilises in evaluation of the older people suffering from falls.
Further, the study also emphasises on the ba
iers against the fall services in protecting the elderly population. The significance of the study has been efficiently established by the researcher with the cu
ent availability of the fall records by WHO and even by the quality standards in U.K. 2017. Moreover, other evidences like the different multifactorial approaches and the frailty syndromes have been discussed as a part of the Significance of the research. Lastly, the evidences from the British Geriatric society, the General Medical Services and the N.H.S. England 2017 add in strengthening the necessity of the study that has been ca
ied by Tarafdar et al. (2018).
Literature Review
The literature review helps in creating a foundation on any topic of discussion. It helps the readers in the identification of the gaps in the research, inconstancies and conflicts related to the study. However, literature review helps in placing ones’ research with the help of the context of the previously established studies (Adom, Hussein & Agyem, 2018). The literature review that has been presented in the study is inadequate.
Even though, the author discusses about the incidence fall in older population and evidences of the investigations that has been ca
ied out by the previous researchers in the investigation of the perceptions of healthcare professionals. The gap in the previous studies with the lack of adequate assessment in terms of the discussion on frailty were although mentioned in the last 12 months, however adequate literature has not been presented in the study.
Further, the study lacks adequate discussion of the conceptual framework, based on which the study and the selection of the methodologies were established. The author simply provides a
ief overview with the use of the popular sources however there is a lack in adequate academic literature support (Evans et al. 2017). The literature support helps in maintaining...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here