© MIT July, XXXXXXXXXXT2 2020
Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines
School School of Business
Course Name Master of Professional Accounting
Unit Code MA618
Unit Title Industry-based Capstone Project
Trimester 2, 2020
Assessment
Author
Monica Jurin
Assessment Type Individual
Assessment Title Formative Assessment
Unit Learning
Outcomes
Addressed:
. Work with a high level of personal autonomy and accountability to efficiently and
effectively to complete project-based work integrated learning.
Weighting 5%
Total Marks 100 marks
Word Limit 600 words
Release Date Week 1
Due Date Week 3
Submission
Guidelines
All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date (as above) along with a
completed Assignment Cover Page.
The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Cali
i (Body) font
and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings.
Reference sources must be cited in the text of the Assessment Task, and listed
appropriately at the end in a Reference List using APA 6th edition for the School of
Business. https:
li
ary.mit.edu.au
eferencing/APA
Extension /
Special
Consideration
If an extension of time to submit work is required, an Application for Special
Consideration and supporting documentation must be submitted online via your
Academic Management System (AMS) login: https:
online.mit.edu.au/ams.
The Application for Special consideration must be submitted no later than three (3)
working days after the due date of the specific piece of assessment or the examination
for which you are seeking Special Consideration. In the case of serious illness, loss or
ereavement, hardship or trauma students may be granted special consideration.
Academic
Misconduct
Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the case,
penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course
or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy
and procedure available at: https:
www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-
publications/policies-procedures-and-
guidelines/AcademicIntegrityPolicyAndProcedure. For further information, please
efer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description.
https:
li
ary.mit.edu.au
eferencing/APA
https:
online.mit.edu.au/ams
https:
www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/AcademicIntegrityPolicyAndProcedure
https:
www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/AcademicIntegrityPolicyAndProcedure
https:
www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/AcademicIntegrityPolicyAndProcedure
MA618 Industry-Based Capstone Project
Lasted Updated: July, 2020
Assessment Cover Sheet
Student ID Numbe
s: Student Last name/s: Student First name/s:
Course: School:
Unit code: Unit title:
Due date: Date submitted: Campus:
Lecturer’s Name: Tutor:
Student Declaration
I/We declare and certify that:
1. the work contained in this assessment is my/our own work/group work, except where acknowledgement
of sources is made;
2. this assessment has not been submitted previously for academic credit in this or any other course;
3. I/we have read MIT’s Plagiarism and Academic Misconduct Policy and Procedure, and I/we understand
the consequences of engaging in plagiarism, collusion and contract cheating;
4. a copy of the original assignment is retained by me/us and that I/we may be required to submit the
original assignment to the Lecturer and/or Unit Co-ordinator upon request;
I/we have not plagiarised the work of others or participated in unauthorised collaboration or contract cheating
when preparing this assessment.
MIT ID Signature Date
For Assessor Use Only (if not marked on Moodle)
Name:
Position
Date:
Signature:
Marks/Grades:
MA618 Industry-Based Capstone Project
Lasted Updated: July, 2020
Assessment Task Description
You are required to complete the following assessment.
Based on the first two weeks of workshop you have attended, answer the following questions:
1. What challenge you may face when managing a client? Describe the scenario and
propose a strategy to overcome the challenge XXXXXXXXXXwords)
2. What issues you may face when working in a group? Propose a strategy how you can
overcome or manage the issues XXXXXXXXXXwords)
Use business writing style with relevant vocabulary. Conduct your independent research and use APA
eferencing style.
The marks allocated to each of the question above is equally weighted according to the
eakdown
marks in the marking criteria table below.
Marking criteria:
Assessment criteria are shown in the following table. Marks are allocated as follows:
Assessment
criteria to be met
and assessed
Detailed Description of the Assessment Criteria Breakdown
Marks
Criteria 1 Independent thinking skill 25
Criteria 2 Autonomous skill 25
Criteria 3 English writing skill 25
Criteria 4 Referencing 25
Total 100
Using Technology for Assessment
Rationale Activities Technological tools selected
reflection on learning
feedback on
performance
practice of critical
thinking, independent
thinking, autonomous
skill
Reflective writing
check for plagiarism
problem-based learning
scenario testing
Turnitin
© MIT July, XXXXXXXXXXT2 2020
Marking Ru
ic for Individual Assessment:
Marking
Ru
ic
Criteria/
Grades
High Distinction (HD)
[Excellent]
80-100%
Distinction (D) [Very Good]
70%-79%
Credit (C) [Good]
60%-69%
Pass (P) [Satisfactory]
50%-59%
Fail (N) [Unsatisfactory]
50%
Criteria 1:
Independent
thinking skills
An excellent demonstration
to observe, understand and
analyse what was discussed
in the workshops, relate to
the cu
ent environment
and formulate original
ideas and opinions.
A good demonstration to
observe, understand and
analyse what was
discussed in the
workshops, relate to the
cu
ent environment and
formulate some ideas and
opinions.
A general understanding
and analysis of the topics
discussed and formulate
some ideas and opinions.
An attempt to discuss
topics some general
ideas and opinions, but
not well articulated.
Did not attempt to
discuss the topics nor
present any ideas and
opinions.
Criteria 2:
Autonomous
skills
An excellent demonstration
to conduct independent
esearch, consider diverse
viewpoints and articulate
strong arguments.
A good demonstration to
conduct independent
esearch, present a
viewpoint and articulate an
argument clearly.
A general discussion of a
viewpoint and an
argument.
An attempt to consider
other viewpoints or
opinions, but non-
specific.
Did not consider any
viewpoints or opinions.
Criteria 3:
English
writing skills
An excellent demonstration
of expression using proper
and relevant vocabulary,
free of spelling and
grammatical e
ors.
A good demonstration of
expression using proper
and relevant vocabulary,
with minor spelling and
grammatical e
ors.
A general command of
usiness writing skills
with some spelling and
grammatical e
ors.
An attempt to write in
usiness format but
with extensive spelling
and grammatical e
ors.
Illegible with extensive
spelling and grammatical
e
ors.
Criteria 4:
Referencing
Free of any types of
plagiarism or academic
misconduct*.
Free of any types of
plagiarism or academic
misconduct*.
Free of any types of
plagiarism or academic
misconduct*.
Free of any types of
plagiarism or academic
misconduct*.
Commit one or more
types of plagiarism or
academic misconduct*.
MA618 Industry-Based Capstone Project
Lasted Updated: July, 2020
*Types of plagiarism or academic misconduct:
Sham Paraphrasing Material has been copied exactly from the source and has been acknowledged with an in-text citation but has not been quoted;
There is a reference list.
Illicit Paraphrasing Material has been paraphrased from the source without any in-text citation; There is a reference list.
Exact Copying Material has been copied exactly from the source without any in-text citation; There is a reference list.
No Referencing There is no in-text citations nor a reference list.
Collusion Material has been copied from another student’s work;
Recycling The same assignment submitted in more than one unit;
Contract Cheating The assignment has been written by a third party and the students is claiming it as their own work.
Mark:
Overall Feedback
© MIT July, XXXXXXXXXXT2 2020
Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines
School School of Business
Course Name Master of Professional Accounting
Unit Code MA618
Unit Title Industry-based Capstone Project
Trimester 2, 2020
Assessment
Author
Monica Jurin
Assessment Type Individual
Assessment Title Formative Assessment
Unit Learning
Outcomes
Addressed:
. Work with a high level of personal autonomy and accountability to efficiently and
effectively to complete project-based work integrated learning.
Weighting 5%
Total Marks 100 marks
Word Limit 600 words
Release Date Week 1
Due Date Week 3
Submission
Guidelines
All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date (as above) along with a
completed Assignment Cover Page.
The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Cali
i (Body) font
and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings.
Reference sources must be cited in the text of the Assessment Task, and listed
appropriately at the end in a Reference List using APA 6th edition for the School of
Business. https:
li
ary.mit.edu.au
eferencing/APA
Extension /
Special
Consideration
If an extension of time to submit work is required, an Application for Special
Consideration and supporting documentation must be submitted online via your
Academic Management System (AMS) login: https:
online.mit.edu.au/ams.
The Application for Special consideration must be submitted no later than three (3)
working days after the due date of the specific piece of assessment or the examination
for which you are seeking Special Consideration. In the case of serious illness,