ssignment Content

1. Assessment task 3: Written report - annotated bibliography

   Weight: 50%

   Length: 2500 words

   Due date: Week 12, Sunday 7th of November 2021, 23:59 hrs

   Learning outcomes: 1., 2., 3., 4.

   
   

   Format:

   • Word limit: 2500 words.
   • Font: Plain font, for example Calibri 12, Times New Roman 12, Ariel 12
   • Line Spacing: 1.5
   • Reference system: APA7th
   • Submission: SafeAssign via Ultrafileformat.doc or .docx

   
   

   
   

   Assessment instructions

   Using what you have learned from modules 1-6 create a report on an annotated bibliography based on the topic selected in assignment 2. The report needs to contain:

   
   

   1. Introduction/background
   2. Annotated bibliography (4 x relevant and current research articles)
   3. literature evaluation (based on the four articles)
   4. Conclusion

   
   

   In your annotated bibliography you will need to address the following elements:

   • APA 7threference
   • Was the article qualitative or quantitative?
   • What was the aim of the research?
   • How was the study conducted?
   • What were the results of the study and do they answer the study question/aim?
   • What are the strengths and limitations of the study?
   • Overall statement on applicability of research to clinical practice

   
   

   
   

   
   

   Criteria

   • Knowledge of the underpinning principles and theories of research
   • Demonstrate an ability to locate and select appropriate literature to answer a healthcare question
   • Show critical thinking concerning the selected articles and develop a coherent argument for how they address the specified research question
   • Apply academic convention to develop a clear and logical argument within the word limit (+/-10%)

I have to do it on my 500 words subject which was child obesity I will include it on here, above is the instructions, using the PICO framework.

INTERVENTION STRATEGIES FOR CHILD OBESITY

Healthcare Solutions

Research question: What effect does a one-year long, school-based physical activity program have on the reduction of incidences of childhood obesity in school-aged children, compared to those children who do not participate in any physical activity program?

Childhood obesity is a global health problem and the risk of obesity is a widespread issue among many children because it can lead to various cardiovascular diseases, arthritis complications and in serious cases, cardiac arrest.To control childhood obesity, it is necessary to provide children with consistent monitoring of their diet, exercise regime and to ensure they live a healthy and active lifestyle.

Childhoodobesity is an increasing concern and around 10% to 35% of children are suffering from the disease.This is a concerning factor because in the majority of the developing countries, the rate of childhood obesity is much higher (Weihrauch-Blüher, Schwarz & Klusmann, 2019).Children who are considered overweight or obese are at risk of developing health issues such asinsulin resistance, cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes.Other health risks that may develop include the progression of atherosclerosis and, in extreme cases; this may result in premature death.

It is important to identify intervention strategies that have effective qualitative outcomes that can be implemented in a way that they reduce or eliminate adverse health issues, as they relate to childhood obesity.Schools can be utilised as one of the main mechanisms in which health interventions for children can be implemented and executed.It is imperative that the relevant intervention strategy is achieved in accordance with the guidelines approved by the health care department of the government (Weihrauch-Blüher & Wiegand, 2018).

Some schools have conducted studies that have measured the effectiveness of their obesity prevention strategies (physical activity programs).This data was studied to identify whether the relevant intervention strategies have been effective with respect to reducing the number of cases of childhood obesity.

The data revealed that the intervention strategies (physical activity programs) that were implemented by some schools had almost no effect on the prevalence of childhood obesity.It was found that the programs did not reduce cases of obesity as in many situations; the programs did not promote healthcare plans that were designed to manage specific childhood obesity cases.

The intervention strategies incorporated the use of teacher training materials, educational materials, workshops, and classroom lessons as they relate to the execution of physical activities.It was identified that a lack of proper information being taught to students could create other problems that could be detrimental to the students developing an appreciation for the importance of healthy living (Fang et al., 2019).

Some schools adopted several intervention programs, some encouraged physical workouts like aerobic dances, and general physical training programs that accompanied regular education.Health checks including an assessment of a child’s body mass index (BMI) and other studies were completed in order to record the rates of obesity among students.

This process may assist with encouraging students to adopt healthy lifestyle practices and have the potential to assist in preventing health issues associated with childhood obesity. Someschools were reported to discourage their students from purchasing carbonated soft drinks however, it was noted that after one year, this initiative failed to reduce the number of cases of childhood obesity. Studies reveal that the currentrate of childhood is about 17% (Dugas et al., 2017).

The studies as they relate to the effectiveness of physical activity intervention programs in schools, has found that childhood obesity cannot be effectively reduced through the implementation and execution of these strategies. However, these programs can raise awareness for the betterment of lifestyle and educate children on the risks associated with poor lifestyle and childhood obesity.In conclusion, there is benefit to schools implementing these types of intervention strategies because at a minimum, it provides for a mechanism that teaches young people how best to control obesity and live healthy lifestyles.

References

Dugas, C., Perron, J., Kearney, M., Mercier, R., Tchernof, A., Marc, I., & Robitaille, J XXXXXXXXXXPostnatal prevention of childhood obesity in offspring prenatally exposed to gestational diabetes mellitus: where are we now.Obesity facts,10(4), XXXXXXXXXX.

Fang, X., Zuo, J., Zhou, J., Cai, J., Chen, C., Xiang, E., & Chen, P XXXXXXXXXXChildhood obesity leads to adult type 2 diabetes and coronary artery diseases: A 2-sample mendelian randomization study.Medicine,98(32).

Weihrauch-Blüher, S., & Wiegand, S XXXXXXXXXXRisk factors and implications of childhood obesity.Current obesity reports,7(4), XXXXXXXXXX.

Weihrauch-Blüher, S., Schwarz, P., & Klusmann, J. H XXXXXXXXXXChildhood obesity: increased risk for cardio metabolic disease and cancer in adulthood.Metabolism,92, XXXXXXXXXX.