Section 1: You should summarize the ethical issues presented in the four presentations. Use this section of your paper to compare and contrast the nature of the ethical dilemmas presented in the four presentations.
Section 2: You must address how your thinking about public health ethics has been influenced by the presentations and discussions. Discuss the ways in which at least two of the ethical skills listed below have changed through this process.
· Evaluating the impact of actions taken by individuals and organizations that have made or attempted to bring about change for social good.
- Applying moral reasoning to concrete ethical problems in their social context, showing an awareness of the competing values at stake and the implications of the moral decision.
- Identifying the various types of ethical theories and the methods of moral reasoning associated with them.
- Identifying the diversity and commonality of moral values across cultures.
Answer:
Introduction
The purpose of the research paper is to compare and contrast the nature of four other presentations. The paper includes thorough and insightful discussion, ensuring that relevant skills of ethical issues were presented in the presentation.
Section 1
Group B presentation discusses the issue of mandatory childhood vaccinations entering public schools. Group presentation study population target is all American school kids. Group E presentation study population target is all American sex workers. the group's presentation discusses on the issue of the soda tax, where government increases the tax on products with high levels of sugar so as to discourage the public from taking them and this is due to the healthcare issues associated with high levels of sugar. Vaping/E-cigarette this group's presentation targets abusers of Electronic nicotine cigarettes mostly youth, peers, and family.
While comparing all this presentation they have covered ethical principles of nonmaleficence are involved.
Section 2:
The impact of actions taken by individuals and organizations that have made or attempted to bring about changes for social good. Consumers are trying to quit smoking cigarettes, espeically for under-age children and young adults. United States have made their policy to solely sell for those who are above age 21, if one under age 18 found smoking will get penalized. Culture influence have made lot of changes for their own seek in end of life care. Example, African, Asian, Hispanic families may request providers not to disclose a terminal diagnosis. Taiwanese may believe that bad luck occurs if you discuss impending death out loud. Hinduism, Muslim consider it contrary to the churches teaching to use drugs to quicken death. soda consumers could choose healthier alternatives, community projects, health promotion, and educational programs are one who they collect taxes from. some states doesn’t sell sugary beverages, which is pushback for those communities. Soda purchase requires EBT and SNAP programs which is a large pushback for the company itself. Prostitutes have a greater number of sexual partners which increase the spread of any potential STIs, which can affect the community. Little to no protection because it is illegal.
Applying moral reasoning to concrete ethical problems in their social context, showing an awareness of the competing values at stake and the implications of the moral decision.
My presentation Vs. Group B
My presentation discusses the issue of undocumented immigrants and how it connects to medical healthcare access while on the other hand, the group B presentation discusses the issue of mandatory childhood vaccinations entering public schools. Group presentation study population target is all American school kids while my presentation targets all undocumented immigrants in the country.
Both the issue of undocumented immigrants and mandatory childhood vaccinations are aspects that extend to significantly impact public health and in a way put the United States healthcare sector in the spotlight. These topics have such significant ties to public health because the health of a given surrounding population can essentially be determined by a small population of those who aren't vaccinated and illegal immigrants who fail to receive adequate medical care. the group's presentation discusses on the issue of the soda tax, where government increases the tax on products with high levels of sugar so as to discourage the public from taking them and this is due to the healthcare issues associated with high levels of sugar.A lot of controversies mostly ethical ones are involved in both issues of undocumented immigrants and mandatory childhood vaccinations. On both issues of undocumented immigrants and mandatory childhood vaccinations, ethical principles of non-maleficent are involved, wherein the case of immigrants, they ought to receive adequate ethical care without any discrimination with a goal of helping the recovery, on the other hand, children ought to receive immunization vaccines to prevent diseases that could come up such as measles, polio, etc.
My presentation Vs. Group E
My presentation discusses on the issue of undocumented immigrants and how it connects to medical healthcare access while on the other hand, the group E presentation discusses on the issue of legalization of sex work in the United States. Group E presentation study population target is all American sex workers while my presentation targets all undocumented immigrants in the country. My presentation focuses on how government and involved stakeholders can improve medical access a coverage so that even undocumented immigrants can have access to healthcare services while on the other hand, group E presentations address on the issue of legalizing sex work.
Both the issue of undocumented immigrants and sex work are aspects that extend to significantly impact public health and in a way put the United States healthcare sector in the spotlight. These topics have such significant ties to public health because the health of a given surrounding population can essentially be determined by small population sex workers not adopting protection measures or even illegal immigrants who fail to receive adequate medical care. The key similarity is also evidenced that most illegal immigrants in the country don't have papers and seeking formal employment becomes hard forcing some to engage in some form of prostitution just to earn a living. Non-maleficent is a significant ethical principle shared by the two presentations, whereby stakeholders in healthcare are encouraged to provide medical services to both parties without any form of discrimination. In both presentations, public health and other government stakeholders are called to advocate and work for the empowerment of these groups in the community, aiming to ensure that the basic resources and conditions necessary for health are accessible to all and can live healthy lives.
My presentation and Vs. Soda Tax
My presentation discusses the issue of undocumented immigrants and how it connects to medical healthcare access while on the other hand, the group's presentation discusses the issue of the soda tax. Undocumented immigrants involve foreign persons who have entered the country illegally or even entered legally but now have overstayed beyond permitted duration. On the other hand, the group's presentation discusses on the issue of the soda tax, where government increases the tax on products with high levels of sugar so as to discourage the public from taking them and this is due to the healthcare issues associated with high levels of sugar. My presentation targets undocumented immigrants while this group's presentation targets industries that manufacture drinks especially those developing sugar-added drinks.
Both my presentation and the group's presentation touch on very important topics that have got a significant impact on the healthcare sector in the United States. The reason is that as already mentioned, in the case of undocumented immigrants, most of them don't have access to medical healthcare reason being that they are not in the systems, most don't have insurance covers and fear to be caught and deported. This results in most of them have poor health, which negatively impacts respective states and the federal government as well. On the other hand, sugary drinks have got a negative impact on the health of individuals as they lead to increased cases of overweight and obesity, diabetes, all which have got additional implications related to cardiovascular complications. Another notable similarity between the documents is that individuals of Hispanic and African race have got a high prevalence of overweight and obesity while they are the same personas leading with the highest number of undocumented immigrants.
My presentation Vs. Vaping/E-Cigarette Regulations
My presentation discusses the issue of undocumented immigrants, its impact on health, ethical issues involved and measures that can be adopted to bring about correctness measures. On the other, this group's presentation discusses the regulation of e-cigarettes. My presentation targets undocumented immigrants irrespective of age or sex while this group's presentation targets abusers of Electronic nicotine cigarettes mostly youth, peers, and family. Both of the presentations cover delicate topics which both affect public health. This is because a high number of undocumented immigrants results to poor public health since the majority of the individuals cannot access Medicare care, on the other hand, Electronic nicotine cigarettes are harmful to the health of abusers.