This assessment comprises of two parts. Part A and Part B are to be uploaded separately to the “Recorded Interview and Reflection” assessment drop box.
You will be required to submit:
· ONE audio file (MP3 or MP4) via Canvas – maximum 7 minutes (+/- 10% in time). Please ensure to start the recording by stating your student number. Information provided past the 7 minute, 42 seconds point will not be considered in the awarding of the assessment grade.
· ONE written reflection with references XXXXXXXXXXwords, +/- 10%) including intext citations via URKUND and Canvas. Reference list is not included in the word count.
Part A: Recorded interview (maximum 7 minutes)
Students are to identify a family/friend/community member and have a recorded conversation with them regarding chronic or complex conditions that this person experiences. This person cannot be someone you care in a professional capacity.
The format will be in a motivational interview style, utilising communication techniques that focus on health promotion, primary care, self-management principles and strategies, care coordination and decreasing risk of hospitalisation. The interviewee may remain anonymous.
The outcome is that the conversation provides a motivating, person-focused atmosphere conducive to a conversation about the individual's condition and what it means to live well with this/these condition/s, the risks of complications and prevention of hospitalisation.
The recorded interview can be in person, with appropriate public health precautions as required, or in the virtual space.
Part B: Written reflection report XXXXXXXXXXwords)
You are to review your recorded interview and write a reflective report which addresses the following:
1. Utilising peer reviewed, high quality evidence critically reflect on your experience of motivational interviewing as a tool for clinicians to gather clinical information and outline the benefits of motivational interviewing using examples from your interview.
2. Critique your motivational interviewing style. Consider what went well, what might be changed or developed for future interviews and the implications of this experience on your future practice.
3. Through critical reflection of the learning activities of the unit, discuss the impact of these on your understanding of effective care coordination in light of the context or themes of the interview.
As with all academic assessments, students are required to comply with the University's policy and procedure for assessment items, inclusive of ensuring academic integrity of their work. All work must be the students own original work. Any suspicions of academic misconduct will be refe
ed to the ADE as per university policy.
The Assessment will be addressing learning outcomes:
3. Discuss and practice motivational interviewing skills.
4. Critically analyse care coordination and self-management in the context of the risk of acute hospitalisation.
6. Critically reflect on practice in the context of person and care centred care that is evidence informed and framed by communication, integration, resources and collaboration within a multi-disciplinary team.
Ru
ic
Assessment 3: Recorded Interview and Written Reflection
Assessment 3: Recorded Interview and Written Reflection
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome1. Articulate health promotion and primary care in the context of chronic and complex care
10 to >8.5 Pts
HD
Conversation excellently focused on living well with the condition. Excellent application to promote wellness discussion in chronic and/or complex conditions in primary care.
8.5 to >7.5 Pts
D
Conversation very well focused on living well with condition. Very good application to promote wellness discussion in chronic and/or complex conditions in primary care.
7.5 to >6.0 Pts
C
Conversation has a good focus on living well with a condition. Good application to promote wellness discussion in chronic and/or complex conditions in primary care.
6 to >5.0 Pts
P
Conversation adequately focused on living well with a condition. Adequate application to promote wellness discussion in chronic and/or complex conditions in primary care.
5 to >0 Pts
NX
Minimal to no demonstration of health promotion, primary care or wellness in conversation.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome2. Identify key self-management principles and strategies.
10 to >8.5 Pts
HD
Conversation provided an excellent opportunity for the interviewee to identify/discuss self-management strategies to live well with the chronic/complex condition. Clear self-management strategies are outlined.
8.5 to >7.5 Pts
D
Conversation provided a very good opportunity for the interviewee to identify/discuss self-management strategies to live well with the chronic/complex condition. Clear self-management strategies are outlined.
7.5 to >6.5 Pts
C
Conversation provided a good opportunity for the interviewee to identify/discuss self-management strategies to live well with the chronic/complex condition. Clear self-management strategies are outlined.
6.5 to >5.0 Pts
P
Conversation provided an adequate opportunity for the interviewee to identify/discuss self-management strategies to live well with the chronic/complex condition. Some self-management strategies are outlined.
5 to >0 Pts
NX
Minimal to no self-management strategies discussed or identified, no focus on living well with the condition for the person. Self-management strategies identified did not include the interviewee.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome3. Discuss and practice motivational interviewing skills.
5 to >4.75 Pts
HD
Excellent conversation that is positive for the interviewee. Excellent articulation and formulation with the use of open-ended questions. Excellent demonstration of motivation techniques.
4.75 to >4.25 Pts
D
Very good conversation that is positive for the interviewee. Very good articulation and formulation with the use of open-ended questions. Very good demonstration of motivation techniques.
4.25 to >3.25 Pts
C
Good conversation that is positive for the interviewee. Good articulation and formulation with the use of open-ended questions. Good demonstration of motivation techniques.
3.25 to >2.5 Pts
P
Adequate conversation that is positive for the interviewee. Adequate articulation and formulation with some open-ended questions. Adequate demonstration of motivation techniques.
2.5 to >0 Pts
NX
Minimal to no conversation that is positive for the interviewee. Minimal to no open ended questions. Minimal to no demonstration of motivation techniques. Does not use allocated time efficiently.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome4. Critically analyse care coordination and self- management in the context of the risk of acute hospitalisation.
10 to >8.5 Pts
HD
Excellent discussion of hospitalisation , excellent discussion of prevention of hospitalisation, excellent discussion of coordinating care.
8.5 to >7.5 Pts
D
Very good discussion of hospitalisation, very good discussion of prevention of hospitalisation, very good discussion of coordinating care.
7.5 to >6.5 Pts
C
Good discussion of hospitalisation, good discussion of prevention of hospitalisation, good discussion of coordinating care.
6.5 to >5.0 Pts
P
Adequate discussion of hospitalisation, adequate discussion of prevention of hospitalisation, adequate discussion of coordinating care.
5 to >0 Pts
NX
Minimal to no discussion of hospitalisation, minimal to no discussion of prevention of hospitalisation, minimal to no discussion of coordinating care.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome5. Written reflection on conversation informed by Borton's XXXXXXXXXXreflective model
10 to >8.5 Pts
HD
Excellent insightful reflection of themselves. Excellent identification of improvements articulated.
8.5 to >7.5 Pts
D
Very good insightful reflection of themselves. Very good identification of improvements articulated.
7.5 to >6.5 Pts
C
Good insightful reflection of themselves. Good identification of improvements articulated.
6.5 to >5.0 Pts
P
Adequate insightful reflection of themselves. Reflective content is generic rather than a specific self -review.
5 to >0 Pts
NX
Minimal to no insightful reflection. Did not use Borton’s clearly. Minimal to no identification of improvement.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome6. Scholarly approach written reflection
5 to >4.2 Pts
HD
Excellent scholarly approach to the presentation using appropriate methods and skills in line with APA 7th Ed style. Consistent and accurate use of grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling with no e
ors, demonstrating a fluent professional/ academic writing style within the word limit. In-text citations and references are accurate, with no e
ors or unsupported claims, using the APA 7th Ed referencing system.
4.2 to >4.0 Pts
D
A very good scholarly approach to the presentation using appropriate methods and skills in line with APA 7th Ed style with minimal e
ors or omissions. Grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling are consistent with minimal e
ors and minor revision required, demonstrating a professional/ academic writing style within the word limit. Minor e
ors in in-text citations and references with some unsupported claims, using the APA 7th Ed referencing system.
4 to >3.2 Pts
C
A good scholarly approach to the presentation that mostly reflects the use of appropriate methods and skills in line with APA 7th Ed style with multiple e
ors or omissions. Multiple e
ors in grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling with limited editing and revision required. Adheres to the word limit. Multiple e
ors in APA 7th Ed in-text citation and referencing style and unsupported claims evident.
3.2 to >2.5 Pts
P
Adequate scholarly approach to the presentation that somewhat reflects the use of appropriate methods and skills in line with APA 7th Ed style, with significant e
ors or omissions. Significant e
ors in grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling with some editing and significant revision required. Meaning apparent, but language not always fluent. Below or above set word count limit. Significant e
ors in APA 7th Ed in-text citation and referencing style and unsupported claims.
2.5 to >0 Pts
NX
Unsatisfactory presentation with minimal to no scholarly approach that does not reflect the use of appropriate methods and skills in line with APA 7th Ed style, with significant e
ors or omissions. Minimal to no demonstration of consistent and accurate use of grammar, syntax, punctuation, that detracts significantly from the clarity of the writing so that ideas and understanding cannot be communicated clearly to the reader. Thorough editing and revision are required. Well below or above the word count limit. Inco
ect application of APA 7th Ed referencing style resulting in inadequate acknowledgement of sources and risk of
eaching academic integrity/plagiarism.
5 pts
Total points: 50