Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Purpose The purpose of this task is for students to critically analyse a media article. This analysis uses the same article from assessment 1a, building upon the material in the student’s scaffold....

1 answer below »

Purpose

The purpose of this task is for students to critically analyse a media article. This analysis uses the same article from assessment 1a, building upon the material in the student’s scaffold. This task requires students to demonstrate their understanding of the content of the article and the discourses (what is discourse?)within this, analysing these with references to Unit content materials and academic readings.

Process

To complete this task students are expected to incorporate relevant course content and wider authoritative sources from the ACAP library:

1.Students will use the same media article from assessment 1a.

2.Analyse the facts and opinions within the article, considering the background, career, education, or any other relevant aspects of the author/s origins and potential motivations behind them. Elaborate on the research and writing from the students submitted scaffold in assessment 1a, paying attention to the feedback from the tutor.

3.Write an analysis of the potential impact on readers of the article, thinking about the demographic the media is targeted at, and the impact of how the article may be perceived by its readers.

4.Support the writing withat least six relevantacademic references (this means academic articles in addition to any media articles).

Answered 1 days After Jun 07, 2022

Solution

Ayan answered on Jun 08 2022
84 Votes
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT        8
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT
Table of contents
Article analysis – Saving the children' are the three most dangerous words uttered by white people    3
References    9
Article analysis – Saving the children' are the three most dangerous words uttered by white people
Samantha Armytage, the anchor of Channel Seven Sunrise, joined the talking heads from other significant TV slots outside Parliament House upon the a
ival of the A
ott-Turnbull administration spill in 2015. It was the first day of the season of the year's regulative meeting, and they were good to go up near one another, under five meters away, communicating live. In any case, they could never have anticipated the setting. Grandmothers against Removals associations from everywhere over the nation had merged in Canbe
a on that day to fight the nation's soaring paces of Aboriginal youngster evacuation. It had been a
anged out.
Around 100 people gathered behind the cameras, waving Aboriginal banners and shouting for equity, a considerable lot of them grandmothers who had seen their grandparents removed and set in white families. 'Columnists' Armytage and David Koch's response was more awful than calm. They pivoted during one of the business
eaks and chastised people who had gathered behind them. Rather than paying attention to their accounts or finding out about their children, they chastised them for intruding on their show. Koch urged them to check at the associations he provided for before moving toward him, while Armytage 'tsked'. Armytage hoped to have a shift in perspective toward the beginning of today. Out of nowhere, she was extremely stressed over Aboriginal children, whom she felt should have been spared from "assault, viciousness, and disregard," as she put it. She could never have cared less a long time back. They were only a bother, an uproarious crowd blocking her wonderful scenery.
Sunrise
ought two extra white people onto a board close by Armytage Today writer Prue MacSween and radio telecaster Ben Davis to answer a piece in the Daily Telegraph, guaranteeing that the main white person is fit for really focusing on dark children. "Save Our Children" was put over the primary page in three major lines. It included comments from David Gillespie, the Minister for Children, who recommended that this present time was the opportunity to put Aboriginal children in white homes. "Child care isn't great," Dr. Gillespie said in the article, however, there is a hesitance to put them in a more stable situation because of a paranoid fear of creating another Stolen Generation.
McSween, Davis, and Armytage have no involvement with this area. They have no involvement in Aboriginal issues. Their authenticity depends exclusively on the way that they are white. All things considered, it has forever been the most significant basis for a media reporter. It's nothing unexpected that they generally concu
ed with McSween, who pushed for another Stolen Generation and said the conversation was an "easy decision." "You know, we can't have another age of youthful Indigenous children being attacked along these lines," she proceeded, "and this trick of quiet and this misleading PC perspective that leaving them in this risky circumstance." "Maybe we'll need to rehash it, similar to the main Stolen Generation who was kidnapped for their...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here