Promoting Health in Individuals and Populations Assignment 2: Funding proposal
Promoting Health in Individuals and Populations Assignment 2: Marking criteria
Facets of Inquiry Fail
If you were ticked here, this
facet of research needs
work
Pass
If you were ticked here, this
facet of research was OK but
could be improved
Credit
If you were ticked here, this
facet of research is good
Distinction
If you were ticked here, this
facet of research is well
done
High Distinction
If you were ticked here, this
facet of research is excellent
Weighting
A. Clarify
purpose of and
ationale for the
project.
□ The rationale for the
project was poorly
described and not
supported by evidence. The
purpose of the project was
not stated, or not clearly
stated. The abstract did not
summarise the goals,
objectives or strategies of
the project.
□ The rationale for the
project was described, and
some aspects were
supported by evidence. The
purpose of the project was
stated but not clearly
stated. The abstract
summarised the goals,
objectives and strategies of
the project.
□ The rationale for the
project was described, and
supported by evidence. The
purpose of the project was
clearly stated. The abstract
summarised the goals,
objectives and strategies of
the project.
□ The rationale for the
project was well described,
and supported by evidence.
The purpose of the project
was clearly stated. The
abstract summarised the
goals, objectives or
strategies and the project.
□ The rationale for the
project was extremely well
written and described in
detail, and supported by
evidence. The purpose of
the project was clearly
stated. The abstract
summarised the goals,
objectives and strategies of
the project.
20%
B. Outline
informed and
strategies and
activities in your
project plan,
evaluation plan
and funding.
□ The project plan and the
key objectives and
strategies were poorly
described and the
evaluation plan was poorly
outlined.
□ The project plan and the
key objectives and
strategies were described
and there was adequate
detail of the evaluation
plan.
□ The project plan and the
key objectives and
strategies were well
described and evaluation
plan showed a good level of
detail and was appropriately
matched to the program
plan.
□ The project plan and the
key objectives and
strategies were very well
described and evaluation
plan was clear and well
matched to the program
plan.
□ The project plan and the
key objectives and
strategies were extremely
well described and
evaluation plan was
excellent.
30%
C. Evaluate
information/
critical appraisal
□ The project did not appear
to be evidence-based, and
there was very little
indication of critical
appraisal of the literature in
the area.
□ The project did appear to
e evidence-based, and
there was some critical
appraisal of the literature in
the area.
□ It was clear that the
program was evidence-
ased, and there was good
critical appraisal of the
literature in the area.
□ It was very clear that the
program was evidence-
ased, and there was very
good critical appraisal of the
literature in the area.
□ The evidence-base of the
program was extremely well
described and the critical
appraisal of the relevant
literature was clearly
evident.
30%
D. Organise
information and
communicate
knowledge,
demonstrating
ability to adhere
to prescribed
structure.
□ The assignment did not
cover all aspects of the to
the proposal structure. The
assignment was poorly
written, and lacked
coherence between and
within sections.
□ The assignment exceeded
the word count by more
than 10%, and/or a word
count is not provided but it
appears to exceed the word
count by more than 10%.
□ The assignment covered
all aspects of the to the
proposal structure. The
assignment was difficult to
follow in some sections, and
slightly lacked coherence
etween and within
sections.
□ The assignment covered
all aspects of the proposal
structure adequately. The
assignment was written well
and demonstrated
coherence between and
within sections.
□ The assignment was well
written, covering all aspects
of the proposal structure
well. It was coherent within
and between paragraphs.
□ The assignment was
exceptionally well written,
covering all aspects of the
proposal structure
succinctly but with enough
detail.
□ The assignment was
within 10% of the word
count.
10%
E. Analyse &
synthesise and
integrate new
knowledge
throughout
□ The assignment poorly
combined and integrated a
ange of sources of evidence
and poorly or inco
ectly
elated this to the project
plan.
□ The assignment
attempted to combine and
integrate a range of sources
of evidence and attempted
to relate this to the project
plan.
□ The assignment has
combined and integrated a
ange of sources of evidence
and there was a good
attempt to relate to the
project plan.
□ The assignment has
combined and integrated a
ange of sources of evidence
well and this is well
eflected in the project plan.
□ The assignment has
combined and integrated a
ange of sources of evidence
well and this is extremely
well reflected in the project
plan.
5%
F. Apply
discipline
conventions and
“publication”
equirements
□ Sources within the
assignment were not
acknowledged.
□ The assignment did not
include a reference list.
□ Most of the sources
within the assignment were
acknowledged partially
and/or inco
ectly.
□ The reference list is
provided but with many
mistakes or is incomplete.
□ All sources within the
assignment were
acknowledged partially
and/or inco
ectly.
□ The reference list
provided had some
mistakes.
□ The assignment
acknowledged all sources
fully and co
ectly.
□ The assignment included a
eference list, including all
sources and mostly
consistently followed an
established referencing
style.
□ The assignment
acknowledged all sources
fully and co
ectly,
differentiating between
quotations and
paraphrasing.
□ The assignment included a
eference list, including all
sources and consistently
followed an established
eferencing style.
5%
Total out of 100
Slide 1
1/03/2020
1
Promoting Health in Individuals and Populations
Semester 1 2020
Week 1
Dr Clare Hume
Overview of today
• Welcome
• Course coordinato
• Outline of the course
• Assessments
• Topics/schedule
• Principles of Health Promotion
University of Adelaide 2
University of Adelaide community
• COVID-19 and its impact
• Diverse and inclusive
community
• Role of community
during difficult times
• Please respect and take
care of each othe
The University of Adelaide Slide 3
How we can help
• Student Life
• Counselling and support
• XXXXXXXXXX
• Safer Campus Community
• Report harassment or anti-social
ehaviou
• XXXXXXXXXX
• UniCare
• Healthcare on campus
• XXXXXXXXXX
Slide 4
1/03/2020
2
Questions?
www.adelaide.edu.au/newsroom/covid-19
clare.humeαadelaide.edu.au
University of Adelaide 5
Course coordinato
• Dr Clare Hume
– Lecturer, SPH
– BAppSc (Ex & Sp) Hons
• UniSA
– PhD - 2006
• Deakin
– Lecturer, Deakin
– NHFA Post-doc, Deakin
– Honorary fellow, CUHK
University of Adelaide 6
Course outline
• One seminar per week
– Mondays 10am-1pm – Ba
Smith South 1062
• Content
– Recorded lectures
– Online learning activities
– Readings
• + 8 hrs non-contact reading and study
University of Adelaide 7
Schedule
Module 1: Introduction to health promotion
University of Adelaide 8
Week Topic Room Time
Week 1 Introduction to health promotion Ba
Smith
South 1062
10am-
1pm
Week 2 No session (public holiday)
Week 3 Behaviours and health Ba
Smith
South 1062
10am-
1pm
http:
www.adelaide.edu.au/newsroom/covid-19
1/03/2020
3
Schedule
Module 2: Health promotion evidence
University of Adelaide 9
Week Topic Room Time
Week 4 Social determinants of health Ba
Smith
South 1062
10am-
1pm
Week 5 Understanding influences on health behaviours Ba
Smith
South 1062
10am-
1pm
Week 6 Health literacy Ba
Smith
South 1062
10am-
1pm
Schedule
Module 3: Health promotion in action
University of Adelaide 10
Week Topic Room Time
Week 7 Program development and implementation Ba
Smith
South 1062
10am-
1pm
Week 8 Health promotion in practice Ba
Smith
South 1062
10am-
1pm
Week 9 Oral presentation Ba
Smith
South 1062
10am-
1pm
Week 10 Social marketing Ba
Smith
South 1062
10am-
1pm
Schedule
Module 4: Health promotion with vulnerable
populations
University of Adelaide 11
Week Topic Room Time
Week 11 Indigenous health Ba
Smith
South 1062
10am-
1pm
Week 12 Healthy ageing; Refugee and Asylum seeker
health
Ba
Smith
South 1062
10am-
1pm
Week 13 Course summary and review Online
Assessment
Assessment task Due Date Weighting
Online quiz 1 Friday 27th March
(end of week 4)
5%
Assignment 1 Friday 24th April
(mid-semester
eak)
30%
Group presentation Monday 20th May
(week 10)
15%
Online quiz 3 Friday 5th June
(end of week 12)
10%
Assignment 2 Friday 12th June
(end of week 13)
35%
University of Adelaide 12
1/03/2020
4
Questions?
University of Adelaide 13
Today’s material
University of Adelaide