UNCC300
Assessment 2
opinion editorial
Description:
Choose one of the issues listed below and write a 700 words opinion editorial that critically analyses the challenges with realising aspirations of the common good in your professional community, locally and globally.
· Patient access to prohibitively expensive treatments
· Patient confidentiality (
eaches)
· Discrimination in the workplace
· Discrimination in education (access and equity)
· Fraud (financial
usiness contexts)
· Abuse of privacy (social media, IT organisations)
· The “Digital Divide”
· Asylum seekers (and detention/incarceration)
· Poverty and homelessness
· Slavery (and human trafficking)
·
Assesment-3
Essay
Description
Extending your work from Assignment 2, write a 1200 word paper that
iefly critiques a global issue (i.e., the issue or challenge you chose for Assessment 2) where shared responsibility for the common good is not being realised (approx. 300 words) and then, propose ways to address this challenge (approx.. 900 words) in your professional community, locally and globally.
(NB: Emphasis is on your proposed ways to address the challenge because some of the critique will have been covered in Assignment 2).
Please Note: In order to achieve a higher grade you will need to demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the Common Good and its relationship to other CST principles, particularly Human Dignity. Your discussion should demonstrate how Advocacy and Community Engagement may contribute to your proposed solution.
Due date:
Weighting:
Length and/or format:
4 June 4am 50%
1200 words.
Purpose: To demonstrate your ability to apply your knowledge and understanding of principles of human dignity, advocacy, and community engagement to potential ways to address the challenge of realising the common good in a global context.
Reference: APA
Required to get over 50% marks each in assignments to pass this unit
UNCC300 Assessment Task 3 – Essay
HD
85-100
Di
75-84
Cr
65-74
Pa
50-64
NN
0-49
Part 1
(10 marks)
Provides a highly distinctive
critique of a global issue
where shared responsibility
for the common good is not
eing realized; excellent
clarity, coherence and
esearch.
Provides a distinctive
critique of a global issue
where shared
esponsibility for the
common good is not being
ealized; very good clarity,
coherence and research.
Provides a creditable
critique of a global issue
where shared responsibility
for the common good is not
eing realized; good clarity,
coherence and research.
Provides a satisfactory
critique of a global issue
where shared
esponsibility for the
common good is not
eing realized; adequate
clarity and coherence and
some research.
Fails to provide a
satisfactory critique of a
global issue where shared
esponsibility for the
common good is not being
ealized.
Part 2
(30 marks)
Provides a highly distinctive
understanding of advocacy
and its relationship to
community engagement, in
the context of principles of
CST, especially the Common
Good and human dignity, and
the student’s own
professional community, in
order to realize shared
esponsibility for the common
good; excellent clarity,
coherence and research.
Provides a distinctive
understanding of advocacy
and its relationship to
community engagement, in
the context of principles of
CST, especially the
Common Good and human
dignity, and the student’s
own professional
community, in order to
ealize shared
esponsibility for the
common good; very good
clarity, coherence and
esearch.
Provides a creditable
understanding of advocacy
and its relationship to
community engagement, in
the context of principles of
CST, especially the
Common Good and human
dignity, and the student’s
own professional
community, in order to
ealize shared
esponsibility for the
common good; good
clarity, coherence and
esearch.
Provides a satisfactory
understanding of
advocacy and its
elationship to community
engagement, in the
context of principles of
CST, especially the
Common Good and
human dignity, and the
student’s own
professional community,
in order to realize shared
esponsibility for the
common good; adequate
clarity and coherence
overall and some
esearch.
Fails to provide a
satisfactory understanding
of advocacy and its
elationship to community
engagement, in the
context of principles of
CST, especially the
Common Good and
human dignity, and the
student’s own professional
community, in order to
ealize shared
esponsibility for the
common good.
HD DI CR PA NN
Style and Writing
Mechanics
(5 marks)
2.0 = F
2.5 = P
3.25 = C
3.75 = D
4.0-5.0 = HD
Presents information in a very
clear, coherent and highly
engaging style.
No e
ors in grammar,
punctuation and spelling.
Presents information in a
very clear, coherent
engaging style.
Few or no e
ors in
grammar, punctuation and
spelling.
Presents information in
a clear, coherent
engaging style.
Few e
ors in grammar,
punctuation and
spelling.
Presents information in
a satisfactory style.
Some e
ors in
grammar, punctuation
and spelling.
Presents information in
an unsatisfactory style.
Many e
ors in grammar,
punctuation and spelling.
Referencing
(5 marks)
2.0 = F
2.5 = P
3.25 = C
3.75 = D
4.0-5.0 = HD
Exemplary citation of all
sources of information to
support the credibility and
authority of the information
presented.
Very good referencing
throughout; sources cited
accurately and co
ectly.
Provides fully accurate
information about sources
used.
Good referencing
throughout; sources
cited accurately
throughout.
Provides accurate and
sufficient information
about sources used.
Satisfactory
eferencing, in general;
sources cited
accurately, in general
Provides sufficient
information about
sources used.
No referencing or
numerous sources not
cited accurately.
Does not provide
sufficient information
about sources used.