UNCC300
Assessment 2
opinion editorial
Description:
Choose one of the issues listed below and write a 700 words opinion editorial that critically analyses the challenges with realising aspirations of the common good in your professional community, locally and globally.
· Patient access to prohibitively expensive treatments
· Patient confidentiality (
eaches)
· Discrimination in the workplace
· Discrimination in education (access and equity)
· Fraud (financial
usiness contexts)
· Abuse of privacy (social media, IT organisations)
· The “Digital Divide”
· Asylum seekers (and detention/incarceration)
· Poverty and homelessness
· Slavery (and human trafficking)
·
Assesment-3
Essay
Description
Extending your work from Assignment 2, write a 1200 word paper that
iefly critiques a global issue (i.e., the issue or challenge you chose for Assessment 2) where shared responsibility for the common good is not being realised (approx. 300 words) and then, propose ways to address this challenge (approx.. 900 words) in your professional community, locally and globally.
(NB: Emphasis is on your proposed ways to address the challenge because some of the critique will have been covered in Assignment 2).
Please Note: In order to achieve a higher grade you will need to demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the Common Good and its relationship to other CST principles, particularly Human Dignity. Your discussion should demonstrate how Advocacy and Community Engagement may contribute to your proposed solution.
Due date:
Weighting:
Length and/or format:
4 June 4am 50%
1200 words.
Purpose: To demonstrate your ability to apply your knowledge and understanding of principles of human dignity, advocacy, and community engagement to potential ways to address the challenge of realising the common good in a global context.
Reference: APA
Required to get over 50% marks each in assignments to pass this unit
UNCC300 Assessment Task 2 – Op Ed
HD
85-100
Di
75-84
Cr
65-74
Pa
50-64
NN
0-49
Critical Analysis
(26 marks)
Provides a highly distinctive
critical analysis of the chosen
issue and the challenges with
ealising aspirations of the
common good in their
professional community,
locally and globally.
Provides a distinctive
critical analysis of the
chosen issue and the
challenges with realising
aspirations of the common
good in their professional
community, locally and
globally.
Provides a creditable
critical analysis of the
chosen issue and the
challenges with realising
aspirations of the common
good in their professional
community, locally and
globally.
Provides a satisfactory
critical analysis of the
chosen issue and the
challenges with realising
aspirations of the
common good in their
professional community,
locally and globally.
Fails to provide a
satisfactory critical
analysis of the chosen
issue and the challenges
with realising aspirations
of the common good in
their professional
community, locally and
globally.
HD DI CR PA NN
Style and Writing
Mechanics
(2 marks)
F=0
P=1
C=1.3
D= 1.5
HD=2.0
Presents information in a
very clear, coherent and
highly engaging style.
No e
ors in grammar,
punctuation and spelling.
Presents information in a
very clear, coherent
engaging style.
Few or no e
ors in
grammar, punctuation
and spelling.
Presents information in a
clear, coherent engaging
style.
Few e
ors in grammar,
punctuation and spelling.
Presents information
in a satisfactory style.
Some e
ors in
grammar, punctuation
and spelling.
Presents information in an
unsatisfactory style.
Many e
ors in grammar,
punctuation and spelling.
Referencing
(2 marks)
F=0
P=1
C=1.3
D= 1.5
HD=2.0
Exemplary citation of all
sources of information to
support the credibility and
authority of the information
presented.
Very good referencing
throughout; sources cited
accurately and co
ectly.
Provides accurate and
full information about
sources used.
Good referencing
throughout; sources cited
accurately throughout.
Provides accurate and
sufficient information
about sources used.
Satisfactory
eferencing, in
general; sources cited
accurately, in general.
Provides sufficient
information about
sources used.
No referencing or
numerous sources not
cited accurately.
Does not provide sufficient
information about sources
used.