PROJ6002_Assessment_2_Brief_Plans_Module 3 Page 1 of 6
ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF
Subject Code and Title PROJ6002: Project Planning and Budgeting
Assessment Project Scope and Quality Management Plans
Individual/Group Group (2 Students)
Length 2600 words
Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful
completion of the task below include:
(a) Evaluate and apply a range of project management
tools, techniques and practices to diverse global
projects.
(b) Evaluate budgetary and planning outcomes against
project success measures, including stakeholder
expectations.
(c) Develop effective communication methods to
articulate planning outcomes to key stakeholders.
Submission Due by 11:55 pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 3.
Weighting 35%
Total Marks 100 marks
Assessment Task
In a group of 2 students, devise project scope and quality management plans that articulate the scope
and quality approaches for the project in the assigned Case Study provided by your Learning
Facilitator.
Please refer to the Instructions for details on how to complete this task.
Context
The backbone of a project manager’s work is the Project Management Plan. This plan details the
project's execution, monitoring, and control. It combines all of the planning's sub-plans and baselines.
You and your group will create a Project Management Plan for your assigned Case Study in this
assessment. Applying scope and quality tools and techniques to develop the scope statement and
scope and quality management plans of a project is a crucial part of project planning. One of the keys
to project success is effective scope management. Project Scope Management includes processes to
ensure that the project includes all work required to complete it successfully.
PROJ6002_Assessment_2_Brief_Plans_Module 3 Page 2 of 6
A project's quality management plan defines quality requirements, standards for the project and its
deliverables, and how the project will demonstrate compliance. One of the main benefits of this
process is that it provides guidance and direction on how quality will be managed and validated
throughout the project.
Instructions
1. Connect with your assigned group members (provided by your Learning Facilitator).
2. Analyse the project from your own perspectives as up-and-coming project manager
3. Your group will devise subsidiary Project Management plans for Scope and Quality, using
the assigned Case Study provided on Blackboard by your Learning Facilitator.
a) Although all students will receive the same case study, you are expected to
complete this task and create a distinct set of plans in your group.
) These project scope and quality management plans and supporting documentation
must include, but not be limited to, the following components:
● Project Goals and Objectives
● Project Scope Statement
● Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)
● Quality Responsibilities
● Approaches to Quality Assurance, Control and Improvement
● Quality Metrics
4. Write 2600 words and describe the processes, tools, and techniques used in your scope
and quality management plans, as well as your justification for the quality metrics
selected.
5. You can use the template in this subject’s Learning Resources or create your own to devise
the subsidiary project scope and quality management plans.
6. After completing your plans and supporting documentation, each member of your group
should reflect on your respective contributions to the assessment and then (individually)
complete the Group Contribution Survey.
Referencing
It is essential that you use the most recent edition of APA style for citing and referencing research.
Please see more information on referencing in the Academic Skills webpage.
Submission Instructions
Remember that only ONE group member should upload ONE copy of your group’s assessment file(s)
via the Assessment 2 link in the main navigation menu in PROJ6002 – Project Planning and Budgeting.
Submit your answers in an academic style, including both in-text citations and a full reference list
using the co
ect APA style of referencing.
Each member of your group must also individually complete the Group Contribution Survey in the
Assessment 2 link in the main navigation menu in PROJ6002 – Project Planning and Budgeting.
https:
li
ary.to
ens.edu.au/academicskills/apa/tool
PROJ6002_Assessment_2_Brief_Plans_Module 3 Page 3 of 6
Your assessment will be formally graded via the Grade Centre by your Learning Facilitator and
feedback will be provided through My Grades.
Academic Integrity
All students in the group are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is
appropriately referenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing Guide. Students
also need to have read and be aware of To
ens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and
Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. These are viewable online.
Students also must keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts.
Special Consideration
To apply for special consideration for a modification to an assessment or exam due to unexpected or
extenuating circumstances, please consult the Assessment Policy for Higher Education Coursework
and ELICOS and, if applicable to your circumstance, submit a completed Application for Assessment
Special Consideration Form to your Learning Facilitator.
https:
laureate-au.blackboard.com/webapps
lackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_20163_1&content_id=_2498847_1&mode=reset
http:
www.to
ens.edu.au/policies-and-forms
https:
laureate-au.blackboard.com
cswebdav/xid-4650246_1
https:
laureate-au.blackboard.com
cswebdav/xid-4650246_1
https:
laureate-au.blackboard.com
cswebdav/xid-4652143_1
https:
laureate-au.blackboard.com
cswebdav/xid-4652143_1
PROJ6002_Assessment_2_Brief_Plans_Module XXXXXXXXXXPage 4 of 6
Assessment Ru
ic
Assessment Attributes
Fail
(Yet to achieve
minimum standard)
0-49%
Pass
(Functional)
50-64%
Credit
(Proficient)
65-74%
Distinction
(Advanced)
75-84%
High Distinction
(Highly advanced)
85-100%
Knowledge and
understanding of project
scope and quality
management.
Applies project scope and
quality management
tools and techniques.
Percentage for this
criterion = 35 %
Demonstrates a partially
developed understanding
of project scope and
quality management.
Key components of the
assignment are not
addressed, including
elements of scope or
quality management
plans and/or relevant
tools and techniques are
not applied.
Demonstrates a
functional knowledge of
project scope and quality
management.
Demonstrates a limited
application of project
scope and quality tools
and techniques to project
planning.
Demonstrates proficient
knowledge of project
scope and quality
management.
Demonstrates a
proficient application of
project scope and quality
tools and techniques to
project planning.
Demonstrates advanced
knowledge of project
scope and quality
management.
Demonstrates an
advanced application of
project scope and quality
tools and techniques to
project planning.
Demonstrates highly
advanced knowledge of
project scope and quality
management.
Demonstrates a highly
advanced application of
project scope and quality
tools and techniques to
project planning.
Effectively utilises the
case study and presents
the required elements of
project scope and quality
management plans.
Percentage for this
criterion = 35 %
Very limited presentation
of information related to
the assigned case study
Does not adhere to the
format of scope and
quality management
plans.
Very limited range of
specialised language and
terminology; frequent
e
ors
Limited presentation of
information related to
the assigned case study
Largely adheres to the
format of project scope
and quality management
plans.
Limited range of
specialised language and
terminology with some
e
ors
Adequate presentation of
information related to
the assigned case study
Adheres to the format of
project scope and quality
management plans.
Adequate range of
specialised language and
terminology with
occasional e
ors
Skilful presentation of
information related to
the assigned case study
Adheres to the format of
project scope and quality
management plans.
Range of specialised
language and
terminology with very
few e
ors
Very skilful presentation
of information related to
the assigned case study
Adheres to the format of
project scope and quality
management plans.
Wide range of specialised
language and
terminology with no
e
ors
PROJ6002_Assessment_2_Brief_Plans_Module XXXXXXXXXXPage 5 of 6
Assessment Attributes
Fail
(Yet to achieve
minimum standard)
0-49%
Pass
(Functional)
50-64%
Credit
(Proficient)
65-74%
Distinction
(Advanced)
75-84%
High Distinction
(Highly advanced)
85-100%
Effective Communication
(Written)
Percentage for this
criterion = 10 %
Very limited organisation,
text, structure and
coherence
Frequent e
ors in
spelling, grammar and/or
punctuation
Limited organisation,
text, structure and
coherence
Some e
ors in spelling,
grammar and/or
punctuation
Adequate organisation,
text, structure and
coherence
Occasional e
ors in
spelling, grammar and/or
punctuation
Good organisation, text,
structure and coherence
Very few e
ors in
spelling, grammar and/or
punctuation
Very good organisation,
text, structure and
coherence
No e
ors in spelling,
grammar and/or
punctuation
Teamwork
Percentage for this
criterion = 10 %
Does not maintain
awareness of changing
team needs and does not
adjusts own workload to
ensure team
commitments are met.
Submission is
inconsistent in style and
design, and