Page 1 of 2
Assessment Type Report
Assessment
Number
Assessment
Weighting
2
Individual
20%
Alignment with Unit Learning Outcomes Graduate Attributes Assessed
Unit and Course
LO1
LO2
LO3
Communication: The ability to communicate
effectively, both orally and in writing, with a
diverse range of audiences
Critical thinking and problem solving: The
ability to address and solve problems creatively
and in a structured and methodical way
Due Date/Time Session 6
Assessment
Description
Students are required to write a report of 2000 words. The students have to choose one of
the subtopics from the main topic in the table below and develop the Knowledge
Management concepts, including the definitions, types, strategies and business models.
Knowledge Management Topics (Session 1 – 6)
TOPIC 1 - NATURE OF
KNOWLEDGE
TOPIC 2 - LEVERAGING
KNOWLEDGE
TOPIC 3 - CREATING
KNOWLEDGE
Subtopic 1 - Data, information
and knowledge
Subtopic 1 - Intellectual
capital
Subtopic 1 - Organisational
learning
Subtopic 2 - History of
managing knowledge
Subtopic 2 - Strategic
management perspectives
Subtopic 2 - Learning
organisations
Subtopic 3 - Philosophical
perspectives on knowledge
Subtopic 3 - Knowledge
management strategy
Content:
This assessment is to demonstrate that you have learned Knowledge Management
concepts, including the definitions, types, strategies and business models. This assessment
is based on session 1 - session 6.
Structure:
It should be written as a journal and should include the following:
• One of the subtopics in the table above
• What are the concepts, definitions, types, strategies and business models?
• How the knowledge gained will help you in future career as an IT Professional
• Minimum 5 journal articles (Harvard Referencing)
Unit BISY3005/ISY3005/ISY305 – Knowledge Management
Page 2 of 2
Detailed
Submission
Requirements
Submit soft-copy of the reflection to A2 Report Link on BISY3005/ISY3005/ISY305 Moodle
Page.
• Title page
• Introduction/Conclusion/Content Table
• Subtitles
• Heade
Footer details including page number
• 2.5 cm margins
• 1.5 point spacing
• Cali
i or Arial font
• 11-12 size font
Page 3 of 2
• Students should not engage in any form of misconduct such as cheating during
• The AIH misconduct policy and procedure can be read on the AIH website
(https:
aih.nsw.edu.au/about-us/policies-procedures/).
Misconduct
Special
consideration
Marking Criteria
• Students whose ability to submit or attend an assessment item is affected by
sickness, misadventure or other circumstances beyond their control, may be
eligible for special consideration. No consideration is given when the condition or
event is unrelated to the student's performance in a component of the assessment,
or when it is considered not to be serious.
• Students applying for special consideration must submit the form within 3 days of
the due date of the assessment item or exam.
• The form can be obtained from the AIH website (https:
aih.nsw.edu.au/cu
ent-
students/student-forms/) or on-campus at Reception.
• The request form must be submitted to Student Services. Supporting evidence
should be attached. For further information please refer to the Student
Assessment Policy and associated Procedure available on
• (https:
aih.nsw.edu.au/about-us/policies-procedures/).
You will be marked according to the following criteria, with a final mark out of 30. However, it will be scaled down to 10
marks.
Criteria Excellent
(100% – 85%)
Good
(84% – 75%)
Credit
(74% – 65%)
Pass
(64% – 50%)
Incomplete
(49 – 0%)
1. Title page
2. Clear layout
3. Reference /
Appendix
Work done with
exceptional care and
attention to detail.
Work done with
excellent
care and attention to
detail.
Work done with very good
care and attention to
detail.
Work done with
fairly understanding
care
and attention to
detail.
Work done with no
care or attention to
detail.
Topics covered Exceptional description
of topics encountered in
the
course.
Excellent description
of topics encountered
in the
course.
Well done description of
topics encountered in the
course.
Fairly detailed
description of topics
encountered in the
course.
Incoherent / limited
description of topics
encountered in the
course.
Critical thinking
and synthesis of
information
Exceptional analysis of
the assessment
equirements.
Excellent analysis of
the assessment
equirements.
Well done analysis of the
assessment
equirements.
Fairly detailed
analysis of the
assessment
equirements.
Incoherent analysis
of the assessment
equirements.
Applicability
of
knowledge
Exceptional explanation
of the applicability of the
assessment
equirements.
Excellent explanation
of the applicability of
the
assessment
equirements.
Well done explanation of
the applicability of the
assessment
equirements.
Fairly detailed
explanation of the
applicability n of the
assessment
equirements.
Unclear explanation
of the applicability of
the assessment
equirements.
Harvard
Referencing
The report follows a
eferencing style that
complies with the
Harvard style, and the
in-text citations are
made purposefully.
The report follows a
eferencing style that
complies with the
Harvard style, and the
in-text citations are
made purposefully.
The report follows a
eferencing style that
complies with the Harvard
style, and the in-text
citations are made
purposefully.
The report follows a
eferencing style
that does not
comply with the
Harvard style, or
only includes either
the in-text citations
or the reference list.
The report does not
include any citations
and/or a reference
list.
https:
aih.nsw.edu.au/about-us/policies-procedures
https:
aih.nsw.edu.au/cu
ent-students/student-forms
https:
aih.nsw.edu.au/about-us/policies-procedures/