Criteria
N
N
P
C
D
HD
Criterio
Score
(1a)
Transaction
analysis
(25/100
marks).
ULO1 and
GLO1
3.6 points
Demonstrates no
understanding of
concepts and their
application.
(0 – 7.2 marks)
9.9 points
Demonstrates little
understanding of
the concepts.
Transactions either
omitted or partially
or inco
ectly
ecorded. Needs
work on treatment
and understanding
of depreciation and
alance day
adjustments.
XXXXXXXXXXmarks)
13.6 points
Transactions
ecorded co
ectly
to an acceptable
level but needs
further
improvement of
depreciation and
treatment of
alance day
adjustments.
XXXXXXXXXX7marks)
16.1 points
Demonstrated good
understanding of
transaction
analysis. Some
e
ors or
inconsistencies
associated with
depreciation
calculations and
treatment of
alance day
adjustments.
XXXXXXXXXXmarks)
18.6 points
Demonstrated very
good understanding
of transaction
analysis and
accounting equation
with most
calculations and
alance day
adjustments co
ect.
(17.5 – 19.7 marks)
25 points
Demonstrated an
exemplary
understanding of
concepts and their
application.
Exemplary
transaction
analysis and
treatment of both
depreciation and
alance day
adjustments.
(20-25 marks)
25
(1b) Income
statement
(10/100
marks).
ULO1 and
GLO1
1.5 points
Income statement
either not
attempted, or
showed no
understanding of
classification or
presentation.
(0 – 2.9 marks)
4 points
Income statement
attempted but no
clear evidence of
understanding
classification or
presentation.
(3-4.9 marks)
5.5 points
Most entries co
ect
along with
classification and
eport presentation.
XXXXXXXXXXmarks)
6.5 points
Fundamentally
good report
showing good
understanding of
classification and
eport presentation.
(6 – 6.9 marks)
7.5 points
Very well presented
Income Statement.
Very good
classification and
treatment of
depreciation and
alance day
adjustments all
included.
(7 – 7.9 marks)
10 points
Shows an
exemplary
command of
Income Statement
presentation and
classification with
all accounts
included.
(8-10 marks)
10
(1c)
Balance
sheet
(15/100
marks).
ULO1 and
GLO1
2.2 points
Balance sheet
either not
attempted, or
showed no
understanding of
classification or
presentation.
(0. – 4.3 marks)
5.9 points
Balance sheet
attempted but no
clear evidence of
understanding
classification or
presentation.
(4.5 – 7.3
marks)
8.2 points
Most entries co
ect
along with
classification and
eport presentation.
(7.5 – 8.8 marks)
9.7 points
Fundamentally
good report
showing good
understanding of
classification and
eport presentation.
XXXXXXXXXXmarks)
11.2 points
Very well presented
Balance Sheet.
Very good
classification and
treatment of
depreciation and
alance day
adjustments all
15 points
Shows an
exemplary
command of
Balance Sheet
presentation and
classification with
all accounts
included.
15
included.
XXXXXXXXXXmarks)
XXXXXXXXXXmarks)
(2a)
Modern
Slavery Act.
(25/100
marks)
.
ULO1,
ULO2 and
GLO1
3.6 points
Answer omitted or
does not clearly
describe or identify
the issues.
XXXXXXXXXXmarks)
9.9 points
Answer omitted or
ief answer provided
missing key points of
any potential legal
implications.
XXXXXXXXXXmarks)
13.6 points
Showed reasonable
understanding of the
Act implications but
did not address
details of purpose
and to whom it
applied.
(12.5 – 14.7 marks)
16.1 points
Good discussion the
Act together with a
easonable but
ief
discussion of
purpose and to whom
it applies
(15 – 17.2 marks)
18.6 points
Very good discussion
of he Act together
with a reasonable but
ief discussion of
purpose and to whom
it applies. Good
discussion of how the
Act may help in
protecting employee
ights. But lacking in
appropriate sources
to support discussion
XXXXXXXXXXmarks)
25 points
Demonstrated
excellent
understanding of
the Act together with
a discussion of
purpose and to whom
it applies. Excellent
discussion of how the
Act may help in
protecting employee
ights. together with
all appropriate
sources to support
discussion.
XXXXXXXXXXmarks)
25
2(b)
Potential
legal
implications.
(25/100
marks
)
ULO1,
ULO2 and
GLO1
3.6 points
Answer omitted or
does not clearly
describe or identify
the issues.
XXXXXXXXXXmarks)
9.9 points
Brief answer
provided missing
key points and not
supported by
elevant research
into integrated
eporting.
XXXXXXXXXXmarks)
13.6 points
Showed a
udimentary
understanding of
potential legal
implications.
(12.5 – 14.7 marks)
16.1 points
Good discussion of
any potential legal
implications and
sources.
(15 – 17.2 marks)
18.6 points
Very good
discussion of any
potential legal
implications
together with a very
good discussion as
to any relevant
sources.
XXXXXXXXXXmarks)
25 points
Demonstrated
extensive
understanding of
any potential legal
implications
esulting from the
ehaviour.
Addresses any
elevant legislation.
All sources
acknowledged.
XXXXXXXXXXmarks)
25
MPA702 Assignment 1
Name:
Student Id:
Part 1
Transaction Analysis Chart
Assets
Liabilities
Owner’s equity
· Add extra rows (pages) as needed.
MPA702 Financial Interpretation
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT 1 – TRIMESTER 2, 2020
DUE DATE AND TIME: Monday 24th August 2020 by 8.00pm
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL GRADE: 20%
Learning Outcome Details
Unit Learning Outcome (ULO) Graduate Learning Outcome
(GLO)
ULO 1: Assess the financial standing of an entity by
examining relevant financial information and identify
how disclosure techniques can support business
decisions.
DGLO1 Discipline specific
knowledge and capabilities
ULO 2: Evaluate scenarios involving ethical decisions
in financial accounting.
DGLO1 Discipline specific
knowledge and capabilities
Assessment Feedback:
Students who submit their work by the due date will receive their marks and
feedback on CloudDeakin on within 15 days of submission.
Submission Instructions
1. This assignment is to be submitted ONLINE ONLY (You are NOT required to submit
a hard copy).
2. You must type in your answer for each question on the proforma provided. If not submitted
on the proforma it will not be marked.
3. The c omp le te d assignment question must be submitted into the allocated area on
CloudDeakin under the Dropbox folder. Two Word files are required. One for Part 1 and
one for Part 2.
4. This is an individual submission and covers topics 1-4.
5. You are not required to upload an Assignment Cover Sheet. You will complete a
Plagiarism declaration when you access the Dropbox.
6. Once submitted you cannot take your assignment back BUT you CAN SUBMIT
another version. The most recent version submitted will be marked.
7. Please refer to the ru
ic for guidance on the marking structure.
A note on plagiarism and collusion
Plagiarism and collusion are forms of cheating and is considered a serious
academic misconduct, a n d seve re p e n a l t i e s a r e assoc ia te d w i t h them.
Please refer to the MPA702 u n i t g u i d e f or your r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s w i t h
e g a r d t o p l a g ia r i s m a n d o t h e r academic offences.
You must keep a backup copy of every assignment you submit, until the marked
assignment has been returned to you. In the unlikely event that one of your
assignments is misplaced, you will need to submit your backup copy.
Any work you submit may be checked by electronic or other means for the purposes of
detecting collusion and/or plagiarism.
When you are required to submit an assignment through your CloudDeakin unit
site, you will receive an email to your Deakin email address confirming that it has been
submitted. You should check that you can see your assignment in the Submissions
view of the Assignment dropbox folder after upload, and check for, and keep, the email
eceipt for the submission.
Notes
• Penalties for late submission: The following marking penalties will