Based on your chosen topic, you will be expected to compile your findings as a mini systematic review, which includes the following information Include 10-20 articles. · Introduction: The Introduction...

Based on your chosen topic, you will be expected to compile your findings as a mini systematic review, which includes the following information
Include 10-20 articles.
· Introduction: The Introduction summarizes the topic and explains why the scientific literature review was conducted. Why is the topic important? What is known about your chosen topic at the moment? There might have been gaps in the existing knowledge or a disagreement in the literature that necessitated a review. The introduction should also state the purpose and aims of the review.
· Methods: The Methods section is the most crucial part of a scientific literature review. The methodology followed should be explained clearly and logically. The following components should be discussed in detail:
· Inclusion and exclusion criteria
· Identification of studies
· Study selection
· Data extraction
· Quality assessment
· Data analysis
Essentially, discuss your search strategy e.g. how did you select the scientific papers that you have included in this report?
· Results: The Results section should also be explained logically. You can begin by describing the search results, and then move on to the study range and characteristics, study quality, and finally discuss the effect of the intervention on the outcome.
· Discussion: The Discussion should summarize the main findings from the review and then move on to discuss the limitations of the study and the reliability of the results. Finally, the strengths and weaknesses of the review should be discussed, and implications for cu
ent practice suggested.
· References: The References section of a scientific literature review article usually contains an extensive number of references. You have to be very careful and ensure that you do not miss out on a single one. You can consider using reference management software to help you tackle the references effectively.
 
You will be marked on:
· Explanations of dietary patterns/ nutritional habits identified and how it is linked to the prevention of your chosen health priority area
· Your scientific rigour and choice of scientific literature including description of methods, synthesis of your results and referencing
· Critical thinking and appraisal of literature as well as synthesised findings
*Please see Marking Ru
ic on Canvas for further information
Assignment Part B Final Report (40% )
Due Sunday 31/5 11:59pm. 3000 words max (excluding references).
Please include a signed cover sheet with your submission.
 
Ru
ic
NTR30001 Assignment B Scientific Literature Review
    NTR30001 Assignment B Scientific Literature Review
    Criteria
    Ratings
    Pts
    This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDietary pattern identification
Chronic condition from National Health Priority Area identified.
Relevant dietary pattern/ nutritional habit identified
        5.0 to >3.5 Pts
Excellent
Both components have been clearly identified. Excellent description of dietary pattern including detailed and accurate definition.
    3.5 to >2.5 Pts
Above average
Chronic condition not from National Health Priority Area Good description of dietary pattern including accurate definition but some details are missing.
    2.5 to >1.0 Pts
Satisfactory
Chronic condition not from National Health Priority Area Average description of dietary pattern including some inaccuracies in definition and some details are missing.
    1.0 to >0 Pts
Unsatisfactory
It is unclear which National Health Priority area and relevant dietary pattern has been identified. Poor description of dietary pattern including major inaccuracies in definition and details are missing. *Marked zero if definition of dietary pattern is completely inaccurate or missing
    5.0 pts
    This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDietary pattern/nutritional habit linked to prevention of chronic condition
        5.0 to >3.5 Pts
Excellent
Clear links established between chosen health condition and dietary pattern/nutritional habits, prevention of disease explained in detail
    3.5 to >2.5 Pts
Above average
Good description of links between chosen health condition and dietary pattern/nutritional habits, prevention of disease explained in detail
    2.5 to >1.0 Pts
Satisfactory
Average description of links between chosen health condition and dietary pattern/nutritional habits, average explanation of links with prevention of disease.
    1.0 to >0 Pts
Unsatisfactory
Poor description of links between chosen health condition and dietary pattern/nutritional habits, prevention of disease not explained at all.
    5.0 pts
    This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeLiterature search strategy
        10.0 to >7.0 Pts
Excellent
Excellent methodology and clear description of search strategy including choice of search terms, inclusion and exclusion criteria, critical selection of papers.
    7.0 to >6.0 Pts
Above average
Good methodology and clear description of search strategy including choice of search terms, inclusion and exclusion criteria, critical selection of papers. Some minor details missing.
    6.0 to >5.0 Pts
Satisfactory
Average methodology and unclear description of search strategy including choice of search terms, inclusion and exclusion criteria, critical selection of papers. Several details missing
    5.0 to >0 Pts
Unsatisfactory
Poor methodology and/or very unclear description of search strategy including choice of search terms, inclusion and exclusion criteria, critical selection of papers. Mark 0 if section absent.
    10.0 pts
    This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeCritical thinking and Appraisal of literature
        10.0 to >7.0 Pts
Excellent
Demonstrates excellent critical thinking when appraising the cu
ent evidence. Excellent ability in identifying gaps in literature Excellent ability in identifying implication to nutrition practice and/or research.
    7.0 to >6.0 Pts
Above average
Demonstrates some critical thinking when appraising the cu
ent evidence. Shows good ability in identifying gaps in literature Shows good ability in identifying implication to nutrition practice and/or research.
    6.0 to >5.0 Pts
Satisfactory
Demonstrates little critical thinking when appraising the cu
ent evidence. Shows little ability in identifying gaps in literature Limited identification and explanation of implication to nutrition practice and/or research.
    5.0 to >0 Pts
Unsatisfactory
Demonstrates no critical thinking when appraising the cu
ent evidence. No appraisal of literature (includes unsupported arguments based on opinions rather than scientific evidence) No identification or explanation of implications to nutrition practice and/or research
    10.0 pts
    This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeScientific rigour and referencing (Harvard style or other)
        10.0 to >7.0 Pts
Excellent
Excellent and clear presentation and layout of assignment, including titles/headings. The assignment is easy to follow and read, points made are clearly articulated. Excellent referencing using appropriate style. All statements made have been supported by relevant literature citations
    7.0 to >6.0 Pts
Above average
Good and clear presentation and layout of assignment, including titles/headings. The assignment is reasonably easy to follow and read, points made are mostly clearly articulated. Good referencing with some minor inadequacies/e
ors. Most statements supported by relevant literature.
    6.0 to >5.0 Pts
Satisfactory
Average presentation and layout of assignment, including titles/headings. The assignment is somewhat difficult to read and follow, not all points are clearly articulated. Poor referencing with some major inadequacies/e
ors. Few statements supported by relevant literature.
    5.0 to >0 Pts
Unsatisfactory
Poo
unclear presentation and layout of assignment, including titles/headings. The assignment was difficult to read and follow, points were very unclear Inconsistent referencing (different style used within the document). Only a minority of statements supported by relevant literature.
    10.0 pts
    Total points: 40.0

How A Low-Fat Diet with Garlic Prevent the Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in Both Males and Females of age 25 Years and Ove
1. Introduction
Article example
https:
link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s XXXXXXXXXX
2. Method
3. Results
4. Discussion
https:
www.healthdirect.gov.au/coronary-heart-disease-and-atherosclerosis
https:
www.aihw.gov.au
eports/heart-stroke-vascular-disease/cardiovascular-health-compendium/contents/how-many-australians-have-cardiovascular-disease
https:
www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/Lookup
y%20Subject/ XXXXXXXXXX~2017-18~Main%20Features~Heart,%20stroke%20and%20vascular%20disease~55
XXXXXXXXXX    Irushi Umanda    NTR30001

PowerPoint Presentation
CORONARY HEART DISEASE & LOW-FAT DIET
Student Name: Irushi Umanda
Student ID: XXXXXXXXXX
Unit Code: NTR30001
Unit Convenor: Jeremy Drake
WHAT IS CORONARY HEART DISEASE (CHD)?
It is the damage in the major blood vessels of the heart (WHO, 2020).
Categorized under the group of heart disorders in Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD) (WHO,2020).

Also known as Ischaemic heart disease
The blood flow is reduced due to CHD
Results in weakened heart with abnormal heartbeat
(Healthline, 2018)
LIFE STAGE
Risk of CHD increases with the age
Middle aged adults XXXXXXXXXXyears)
Adults over 55 years are more at risk
(Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2019)
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
Abnormal functional changes associated with injury or disease
Elevated plasma cholesterol levels increase the risk of CHD
High levels of Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) is the major cause
Plaque is formed leading to atherosclerosis (hardening of arteries) and slows down blood flow to heart
Reduced blood flow results in Angina (chest pain)
Complete blockage of arteries (blood clots) result in Myocardial infraction (heart attack)
(Heart Research Institute, 2020)
AETIOLOGY (RISK FACTORS)
Modifiable
(Controllable)     
High blood pressure
High cholesterol level
Smoking
Obesity
Lack of physical exercise
Poo
unhealthy diet
Non-modifiable
(Uncontrollable)
Age
Gender (Men at higher risk)
Genetics
Race & ethnicity
Intellectual disabilities
(Hajar, 2017)
PREVENTION OF CHD
Primary Treatment
Diet (Low fat diet intake)
Avoid smoking and tobacco consumption
Engage in regular physical activities
Secondary Treatment
Surgical vascularization
Medication
(Hall & Lorenc,2014)
FOCUSED DIETARY PATTERN
Low fat diet reduce the risk of CHD
Controls levels of blood cholesterol
Increase intake of food rich in unsaturated fat (avocado, nuts and seeds, vegetable oils etc)
Increase consumption of fibe
WHY LOW-FAT DIET?
Controls blood cholesterol levels
Low fat diet which is rich in unsaturated fats
Reduces risk factors such as obesity, high blood pressure and uncontrolled diabetes
Best dietary patterns to follow;
-choose whole grains
-choose low fat diary products
-Garlic
-choose plenty of green vegetables and fruits
MAIN FUNTIONAL FOOD IN LOW-FAT DIET
Main functional food Garlic and is highly nutritious
Contains antioxidant properties of Acillin
Contains antiviral properties
Lowers LDL level in blood
Lowers blood pressure and blood clotting
Benefits on modulating heart rate, rhythm and force of contraction
Varshney & Budoff, 2016
RESEARCH QUESTION AND PICO
How low-fat diet can reduce the risk of coronary heart disease in both male and female of age 25 years and above
Population – Males and females of age 25 and over
Intervention – Low-fat diet
Comparison - Low-fat diet along with exercise
Outcome XXXXXXXXXXReduced risk of CHD
REFERNCES
Betterhealth XXXXXXXXXXRetrieved 18 October 2019, from     https:
www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/health/conditionsandtreatments/cholesterol#targetText=Cholesterol%20is%20importan    t,-Cholesterol%20is%20produced&targetText=We%20need%20a%20small%20amount,body%20to%20produce%20vitamin%20D
Cardiovascular disease, How many Australians have cardiovascular disease? - Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2019).     Retrieved 21 October 2019, from https:
www.aihw.gov.au
eports/heart-stroke-vascular-disease/cardiovascular-health-    compendium/contents/how-many-australians-have-cardiovascular-disease
Gaziano, T., Bitton, A., Anand, S., A
ahams-Gessel, S., & Murphy, A XXXXXXXXXXGrowing Epidemic of Coronary Heart Disease in Low-     and Middle-Income Countries. Cu
ent Problems In Cardiology, 35(2), XXXXXXXXXXdoi: XXXXXXXXXX/j.cpcardiol XXXXXXXXXX
Hajar, R XXXXXXXXXXRisk factors for coronary artery disease: Historical perspectives. Heart Views, 18(3), XXXXXXXXXXdoi
Hall, S., & Lorenc, T XXXXXXXXXXSecondary Prevention of Coronary Artery Disease. American Family Physician, 81(3), XXXXXXXXXX.     Retrieved from https:
www.aafp.org/afp/2010/0201/p289.html
Healthdirect XXXXXXXXXXRetrieved 18 October 2019, from https:
www.healthdirect.gov.au/what-is-cholesterol
Healthline XXXXXXXXXXCoronary Artery Disease Symptoms. Retrieved from     https:
www.healthline.com/health/coronary-artery-    disease/symptoms
Heart Research Institute XXXXXXXXXXRetrieved 16 October 2019 , from https:
www.hri.org.au/health/learn/cardiovascular-    disease/atherosclerosis
Mayoclinic XXXXXXXXXXRetrieved 19 October 2019 from https:
www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/high-blood-    cholesterol/symptoms-causes/syc XXXXXXXXXX#targetText=These%20deposits%20(plaques)%20can%20reduce,Heart%20attack.